| Literature DB >> 24616823 |
Joana R Sousa1, Lénio Ribeiro2, Aura Silva3, David A Ferreira1.
Abstract
The performance of the cerebral state index (CSI) in reflecting different levels of isoflurane anaesthesia was evaluated in ten cats subjected to four end-tidal isoflurane concentrations (EtIso), each maintained for 15 minutes (0.8%, 1.2%, 1.6%, or 2.0% EtIso). The CSI, hemodynamic data, ocular reflexes, and eye position were recorded for each EtIso concentration. Pharmacodynamic analysis of CSI with EtIso was performed, as well as prediction probability analysis with a clinical scale based on the eye reflexes. The CSI values showed great variability. Between all parameters, burst suppression ratio showed the better fitting with the sigmoidal concentration-effect model (R (2) = 0.93) followed by CSI (R (2) = 0.82) and electromyographic activity (R (2) = 0.79). EtIso was the variable with better prediction of the clinical scale of anaesthesia (prediction probability value of 0.94). Although the CSI values decrease with increasing isoflurane concentrations, the huge variability in CSI values may be a strong limitation for its use in cats and it seems to be no better than EtIso as a predictor of clinical signs.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24616823 PMCID: PMC3925586 DOI: 10.1155/2014/481460
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Med Int ISSN: 2042-0048
Electroencephalographic parameters derived by the CSM and other physiologic data recorded at each end-tidal isoflurane concentration (EtIso—%) studied. The number of animals (N) at each EtIso step is shown. Mean ± standard deviation is shown.
| EtIso |
| CSI | BS (%) | EMG (%) | SQI (%) | MAP (mmHg) | HR (bpm) | SpO2 (%) | EtCO2 (%) | RR (rpm) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.8 | 10 | 51.6 ± 23.9 | 14.3 ± 23.8 | 25.6 ± 28.5 | 79.5 ± 15.8 | 88.6 ± 30.6 | 163.0 ± 28.8 | 98.3 ± 1.3 | 36.7 ± 6.5 | 32.3 ± 12.7 | 37.4 ± 0.4 |
| 1.2 | 4 | 36.1 ± 28.3 | 36.2 ± 42.0 | 16.6 ± 14.1 | 81.2 ± 12.8 | 66.3 ± 14.4 | 138.3 ± 24.8 | 97.0 ± 1.2 | 36.5 ± 6.6 | 20.0 ± 2.9 | 37.1 ± 0.3 |
| 1.6 | 10 | 29.4 ± 13.5 | 25.7 ± 25.9 | 3.0 ± 8.5 | 84.3 ± 20.4 | 68.0 ± 24.3 | 140.2 ± 31.3 | 98.2 ± 1.0 | 39.1 ± 5.8 | 19.6 ± 6.6 | 37.2 ± 0.3 |
| 2.0 | 7 | 17.0 ± 17.7 | 60.9 ± 32.8 | 0.2 ± 0.6 | 91.0 ± 11.6 | 65.4 ± 13.1 | 144.3 ± 24.8 | 98.1 ± 1.3 | 42.6 ± 6.1 | 19.1 ± 6.3 | 37.2 ± 0.6 |
EtIso: end-tidal isoflurane concentration; CSI: cerebral state index; BS: burst suppression (%); EMG: electromyographic activity (%); SQI: signal quality index (%); MAP: mean arterial pressure (mmHg); HR: heart rate (bpm); SpO2: oxygen saturation of haemoglobin (%); EtCO2: end-tidal carbon dioxide (%); RR: respiratory rate (rpm); T: temperature (°C).
Figure 1Representation of the observed effect (horizontal axis) versus the predicted effect (vertical axis) for the cerebral state index (CSI), the electromyographic activity (EMG), and the burst suppression ratio (BS). The coefficients of determination R 2 between the predicted and observed effects are also shown. Dots represent pooled data from all animals (n = 10) and the black line represents the regression line for the effects observed versus effects predicted by the inhibitory sigmoid E max model.
Results from the pharmacodynamic modeling for the parameters studied.
|
| EC50 |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSI | 6.11 | 1.53% | 54.4 | 7.3 |
| BS | 9.4% | 1.75% | 0% | 9.95 |
| EMG | 0.38% | 1.04% | 26.1% | 8.61 |
Data are estimate ± standard deviation. CSI: cerebral state index; BS: burst suppression ratio; EMG: electromyographic activity; E max: maximum effect; EC50: concentration at 50% maximum effect; E 0: baseline effect; γ: hill exponent.
Number of cats that achieved each anaesthetic plane for each end-tidal isoflurane (EtIso—%) concentration studied.
| EtIso—% | Ocular reflexes | Attributed numerical scale | Number of cats that achieved the plane/total number of cats |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.8 | PR+/CR+/EC | 1 | 10/10 |
| 1.2 | PR+/CR+/EC | 1 | 7/10 |
| PR+/CR+/EV | 2 | 1/10 | |
| PR−/CR−/EV or EC | 3 | 2/10 | |
| 1.6 | PR+/CR+/EC | 1 | 1/10 |
| PR+/CR+/EV | 2 | 1/10 | |
| PR−/CR−/EV or EC | 3 | 8/10 | |
| 2.0 | PR−/CR−/EV or EC | 3 | 10/10 |
A numerical scale was attributed from 1 to 3 according to the anaesthetic depth based on the presence (+) or absence (−) of ocular reflexes and the position of the eye: PR: palpebral reflex; CR: corneal reflex; EC: eyeball centred in the eye; EV: eyeball rotated ventrally.
EtIso: end-tidal isoflurane concentration; numerical scale attributed according to the ocular reflexes observed.
Results from prediction probability (Pk) analysis calculated between the clinical scale of anaesthesia (Table 3) and the different parameters studied, from pooled data of the 10 cats. The Pk value and the Jackknife standard deviation (SE) are shown.
| Parameter | Pk (SE) |
|---|---|
| EtIso | 0.94 (0.03) |
| CSI | 0.79 (0.07) |
| EMG (%) | 0.83 (0.08) |
| BS (%) | 0.75 (0.08) |
EtIso: end-tidal concentration of isoflurane; CSI: cerebral state index; EMG: electromyographic activity (%); BS: burst suppression (%).