Jun Zhang1, Michael K Yancey, Cassandra E Henderson. 1. Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, NIH Building 6100, Room 7B03, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. jim_zhang@nih.gov
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the epidemiology of labor induction in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: We used U.S. natality data from 1989 to 1998 and examined the rate of labor induction by year, geographic region, maternal characteristics and pregnancy complications. RESULTS: Between 1990 and 1998, the rate of labor induction increased from 9.5% to 19.4% of all births nationwide. However, the induction rate varied widely by state. White race, higher education and early initiation of prenatal care were associated with a higher rate of induction. For all gestational ages, a significantly increased induction rate occurred during the study period. The increase for clinically indicated induction was significantly slower than the overall increase, suggesting that elective induction has risen much more rapidly. CONCLUSION: The rate of induction of labor more than doubled in the U.S. nationwide in the decade from 1989 to 1998. The increased use of labor induction may be attributable to both clinically indicated and elective induction.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the epidemiology of labor induction in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: We used U.S. natality data from 1989 to 1998 and examined the rate of labor induction by year, geographic region, maternal characteristics and pregnancy complications. RESULTS: Between 1990 and 1998, the rate of labor induction increased from 9.5% to 19.4% of all births nationwide. However, the induction rate varied widely by state. White race, higher education and early initiation of prenatal care were associated with a higher rate of induction. For all gestational ages, a significantly increased induction rate occurred during the study period. The increase for clinically indicated induction was significantly slower than the overall increase, suggesting that elective induction has risen much more rapidly. CONCLUSION: The rate of induction of labor more than doubled in the U.S. nationwide in the decade from 1989 to 1998. The increased use of labor induction may be attributable to both clinically indicated and elective induction.
Authors: Gláucia Virgínia Guerra; José Guilherme Cecatti; João Paulo Souza; Aníbal Faúndes; Sirlei Siani Morais; Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu; Renato Passini; Mary Angela Parpinelli; Guillermo Carroli Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2011-07-05 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Sascha Dublin; Karin E Johnson; Rod L Walker; Lyndsay A Avalos; Susan E Andrade; Sarah J Beaton; Robert L Davis; Lisa J Herrinton; Pamala A Pawloski; Marsha A Raebel; David H Smith; Sengwee Toh; Aaron B Caughey Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2014-10-20 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: S Katherine Laughon; Jun Zhang; Jagteshwar Grewal; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Julie Beaver; Uma M Reddy Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2012-03-23 Impact factor: 8.661