Literature DB >> 12678616

A linear cue combination framework for understanding selective attention.

Richard F Murray1, Allison B Sekuler, Patrick J Bennett.   

Abstract

Using a linear cue combination framework, we develop a measure of selective attention that describes the relative weight that an observer assigns to attended and unattended parts of a stimulus when making perceptual judgments. We call this measure attentional weight. We present two methods for measuring attentional weight by calculating the trial-by-trial correlation between the strength of attended and unattended parts of a stimulus and the observer's responses. We illustrate these methods in three experiments that investigate whether observers can direct selective attention according to contrast polarity when judging global direction of motion or global orientation. We find that when observers try to judge the global direction or orientation of the parts of a stimulus with a given contrast polarity (white or black), their responses are nevertheless strongly influenced by parts of the stimulus that have the opposite contrast polarity. Our measure of selective attention indicates that the influence of the opposite-polarity distractors on observers' responses is typically 65% as strong as the influence of the targets in the motion task, and typically 25% as strong as the targets in the orientation task, demonstrating that observers have only a limited ability to direct attention according to contrast polarity. We discuss some of the advantages of using a linear cue combination framework to study selective attention.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12678616     DOI: 10.1167/3.2.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  5 in total

1.  Surround motion silences signals from same-direction motion.

Authors:  Peter Neri; Dennis Levi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Visual attention: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  High perceptual load leads to both reduced gain and broader orientation tuning.

Authors:  Moritz Stolte; Bahador Bahrami; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Attentional control of sensory tuning in human visual perception.

Authors:  Aspasia E Paltoglou; Peter Neri
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Noisy decision thresholds can account for suboptimal detection of low coherence motion.

Authors:  Nicholas S C Price; John B VanCuylenberg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.