Literature DB >> 24610868

Dexterous manipulation is poorer at older ages and is dissociated from decline of hand strength.

Sudarshan Dayanidhi1, Francisco J Valero-Cuevas2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ability to dynamically control fingertip force vector magnitude and direction is critical for dexterous manipulation. We quantified the dynamic control of fingertip forces to examine how dexterous manipulation declines with age.
METHODS: The strength-dexterity (SD) test measures fingertip forces during compression of a slender spring prone to instability and buckling. The greatest sustained compression (designed to be under 3 N), and force dynamics therein, have been shown to be simple and quick measures of dynamic dexterous manipulation ability. We measured pinch strength and strength-dexterity test in a cross-sectional population of 98 people from 18 to 89 years of age.
RESULTS: Dexterous manipulation ability is poorer at older ages, beginning in middle age (p < .001), with greater decline past 65 years of age. Fingertip force dynamics during spring compression and stabilization show a deterioration of neuromuscular control with age. Importantly, this novel detection of decline in dynamic manipulation ability is not correlated with, and thus cannot be entirely explained by, the known decline in pinch strength. We also measured standardized tests of dexterity in participants older than 45, and discuss how the strength-dexterity test uniquely captures features of sensorimotor capabilities for dexterous manipulation in this adult population.
CONCLUSIONS: Starting in middle age, changes in the functional interactions among sensory, motor, and neural capabilities result in measurably poorer dynamic dexterous manipulation. This deterioration of neuromuscular control motivates and enables future studies to understand the physiological bases for this functional decline so critical to activities of daily living and quality of life.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Dexterous manipulation; Dynamical analysis.; Middle age; Pinch strength

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24610868      PMCID: PMC4202259          DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glu025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci        ISSN: 1079-5006            Impact factor:   6.053


  35 in total

1.  Dissociation of brain areas associated with force production and stabilization during manipulation of unstable objects.

Authors:  Linda Holmström; Orjan de Manzano; Brigitte Vollmer; Lea Forsman; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas; Fredrik Ullén; Hans Forssberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Handling objects in old age: forces and moments acting on the object.

Authors:  Pranav J Parikh; Kelly J Cole
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2012-01-12

Review 3.  Mechanical properties and neural control of human hand motor units.

Authors:  Andrew J Fuglevand
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Associations among strength, steadiness, and hand function across the adult life span.

Authors:  Adam R Marmon; Michael A Pascoe; Robert S Schwartz; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 5.  The potential of virtual reality and gaming to assist successful aging with disability.

Authors:  B S Lange; P Requejo; S M Flynn; A A Rizzo; F J Valero-Cuevas; L Baker; C Winstein
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.784

Review 6.  Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks.

Authors:  Roland S Johansson; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Developmental improvements in dynamic control of fingertip forces last throughout childhood and into adolescence.

Authors:  Sudarshan Dayanidhi; Asa Hedberg; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas; Hans Forssberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Controlling instabilities in manipulation requires specific cortical-striatal-cerebellar networks.

Authors:  Kristine Mosier; Chad Lau; Yang Wang; Madhusudhan Venkadesan; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Evidence of validity in a new method for measurement of dexterity in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Brigitte Vollmer; Linda Holmström; Lea Forsman; Lena Krumlinde-Sundholm; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas; Hans Forssberg; Fredrik Ullén
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 5.449

10.  Decrease in muscle contraction time complements neural maturation in the development of dynamic manipulation.

Authors:  Sudarshan Dayanidhi; Jason J Kutch; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Innovative evaluation of dexterity in pediatrics.

Authors:  Susan V Duff; Dorit H Aaron; Gloria R Gogola; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 1.950

2.  Long term functional outcomes after early childhood pollicization.

Authors:  Nina Lightdale-Miric; Nicole M Mueske; Emily L Lawrence; Jennifer Loiselle; Jamie Berggren; Sudarshan Dayanidhi; Milan Stevanovic; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas; Tishya A L Wren
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 1.950

3.  Quantitative assessment of dynamic control of fingertip forces after pollicization.

Authors:  Nina Lightdale-Miric; Nicole M Mueske; Sudarshan Dayanidhi; Jennifer Loiselle; Jamie Berggren; Emily L Lawrence; Milan Stevanovic; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas; Tishya A L Wren
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Expectation of movement generates contrasting changes in multifinger synergies in young and older adults.

Authors:  Mitchell Tillman; Satyajit Ambike
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Sex differences in leg dexterity are not present in elite athletes.

Authors:  Emily L Lawrence; Lorenzo Peppoloni; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Decrease in force steadiness with aging is associated with increased power of the common but not independent input to motor neurons.

Authors:  Anna Margherita Castronovo; Natalie Mrachacz-Kersting; Andrew James Thomas Stevenson; Ales Holobar; Roger Maro Enoka; Dario Farina
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Sleep-dependent motor memory consolidation in older adults depends on task demands.

Authors:  Christel Gudberg; Katharina Wulff; Heidi Johansen-Berg
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 4.673

8.  Outcome measures for hand function naturally reveal three latent domains in older adults: strength, coordinated upper extremity function, and sensorimotor processing.

Authors:  Emily L Lawrence; Sudarshan Dayanidhi; Isabella Fassola; Philip Requejo; Caroline Leclercq; Carolee J Winstein; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 5.750

9.  Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the control of finger force during dexterous manipulation in healthy older adults.

Authors:  Pranav J Parikh; Kelly J Cole
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Relationship between visuo-perceptual function and manual dexterity in community-dwelling older adults.

Authors:  Chiang-Soon Song
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.