Literature DB >> 25262333

Quantitative assessment of dynamic control of fingertip forces after pollicization.

Nina Lightdale-Miric1, Nicole M Mueske2, Sudarshan Dayanidhi3, Jennifer Loiselle4, Jamie Berggren4, Emily L Lawrence5, Milan Stevanovic2, Francisco J Valero-Cuevas6, Tishya A L Wren7.   

Abstract

Dexterity after finger pollicization (reconstruction to thumb) is critical to functional outcomes. While most tests of hand function evaluate a combination of strength, coordination, and motor control, the Strength-Dexterity (S-D) paradigm focuses on the dynamic control of fingertip forces. We evaluated 10 pollicized and 5 non-pollicized hands from 8 participants ages 4-17 years (2 female, 6 male; 10.6 ± 4.5 years). Participants partially compressed and held an instrumented spring prone to buckling between the thumb and first finger to quantify dynamic control over the direction and magnitude of fingertip forces. They also completed traditional functional tests including grip, lateral pinch, and tripod pinch strength, Box and Blocks, and 9-hole peg test. Six of 10 pollicized hands and all non-pollicized hands had S-D scores comparable to typically developing children. However, dynamical analysis showed that pollicized hands exhibit greater variability in compression force, indicating poorer corrective action. Almost all pollicized hands scored below the normal range for the traditional functional tests. The S-D test Z-scores correlated moderately with Z-scores from the other functional tests (r = 0.54-0.61; p = 0.02-0.04) but more weakly than amongst the other functional measures (r = 0.58-0.83; p = 0.0002-0.02), suggesting that the S-D test captures a different domain of function. A higher incidence of radial absence in the hands with poor S-D scores (3/4 vs. 0/6 in hands with normal S-D scores, p = 0.03) was the only clinical characteristic associated with S-D outcome. Overall, these results suggest that while most pollicized hands can control fingertip forces, the nature of that control is altered.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dexterity; Hand function; Pollicization; Strength–dexterity; Surgical outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25262333      PMCID: PMC4267977          DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  33 in total

1.  Grip and pinch strength: norms for 6- to 19-year-olds.

Authors:  V Mathiowetz; D M Wiemer; S M Federman
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  1986-10

2.  [The hypoplastic thumb].

Authors:  W Blauth
Journal:  Arch Orthop Unfallchir       Date:  1967

3.  An objective and standardized test of hand function.

Authors:  R H Jebsen; N Taylor; R B Trieschmann; M J Trotter; L A Howard
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Long-term review of the surgical treatment of radial deficiencies.

Authors:  L G Bayne; M S Klug
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.230

5.  Dexterous manipulation is poorer at older ages and is dissociated from decline of hand strength.

Authors:  Sudarshan Dayanidhi; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 6.053

6.  Functional outcome for children with thumb aplasia undergoing pollicization.

Authors:  Kimberly Goldie Staines; Ramsey Majzoub; John Thornby; David T Netscher
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Functional outcomes of children with index pollicizations for thumb deficiency.

Authors:  David T Netscher; Oluseyi Aliu; Brinkley K Sandvall; Kimberly G Staines; Kristy L Hamilton; Hector Salazar-Reyes; John Thornby
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 2.230

8.  Outcome after pollicization: comparison of patients with mild and severe longitudinal radial deficiency.

Authors:  Marjolein de Kraker; Ruud W Selles; Jeanette van Vooren; Henk J Stam; Steven E Hovius
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Measuring dexterity in children using the Nine-hole Peg Test.

Authors:  Janet L Poole; Patricia A Burtner; Theresa A Torres; Cheryl Kirk McMullen; Amy Markham; Michelle Lee Marcum; Jennifer Bradley Anderson; Clifford Qualls
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.950

10.  Decrease in muscle contraction time complements neural maturation in the development of dynamic manipulation.

Authors:  Sudarshan Dayanidhi; Jason J Kutch; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  5 in total

1.  Long term functional outcomes after early childhood pollicization.

Authors:  Nina Lightdale-Miric; Nicole M Mueske; Emily L Lawrence; Jennifer Loiselle; Jamie Berggren; Sudarshan Dayanidhi; Milan Stevanovic; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas; Tishya A L Wren
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 1.950

2.  Outcome measures for hand function naturally reveal three latent domains in older adults: strength, coordinated upper extremity function, and sensorimotor processing.

Authors:  Emily L Lawrence; Sudarshan Dayanidhi; Isabella Fassola; Philip Requejo; Caroline Leclercq; Carolee J Winstein; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 5.750

3.  Characterization of the disruption of neural control strategies for dynamic fingertip forces from attractor reconstruction.

Authors:  Lorenzo Peppoloni; Emily L Lawrence; Emanuele Ruffaldi; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Force Variability during Dexterous Manipulation in Individuals with Mild to Moderate Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Na-Hyeon Ko; Christopher M Laine; Beth E Fisher; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 5.750

5.  Strength, Multijoint Coordination, and Sensorimotor Processing Are Independent Contributors to Overall Balance Ability.

Authors:  Emily L Lawrence; Guilherme M Cesar; Martha R Bromfield; Richard Peterson; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas; Susan M Sigward
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.