| Literature DB >> 24608416 |
Sara Szymanska1, Mikael Lördal2, Nilminie Rathnayake1, Anders Gustafsson1, Annsofi Johannsen1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The present study tested the hypothesis that patients with Crohn's disease (CD) have a higher prevalence and risk for caries compared to people without CD.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24608416 PMCID: PMC3946651 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091059
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Demographic data, mean (SD) and percentages (number) for the CD patients (who had not and had undergone resective surgery) and the controls.
| Variable | Control groupn = 75 |
| CD PatientsNo resective surgery n = 79 |
| CD PatientsResective surgeryn = 71 |
|
|
| 46/29 | 39/40 | 38/33 | NS | ||
|
| 48.6 (±13.4) | 0.003 | 42.0 (±14.4) | NS | 50.7 (±13.9) | 0.001 |
|
| 74.4 (±13.0) | 70.5 (±16.6) | 74.3 (±14.4) | NS | ||
|
| 170.8 (±15.8) | 170.8 (±9.8) | 170.0 (±8.6) | NS | ||
|
| 6 (5) | 0.030 | 19 (15) | 0.005 | 25 (17) | 0.012 |
|
| 46 (33) | 41 (30) | 37 (25) | NS | ||
|
| 9 (5) | 19 (15) | 17 (12) | NS | ||
|
| 7 (5) | 3 (2) | 3 (2) | NS | ||
|
| 5 (4) | 13 (10) | 7 (5) | NS | ||
|
| 4 (3) | 5 (4) | 7 (5) | NS | ||
|
| 0 (0) | 4 (3) | 6 (4) | NS | ||
|
| 1.3 (1) | 4(3) | 6 (4) | NS | ||
|
| 3 (2) | 4 (3) | 6 (4) | NS | ||
|
| 1 (1) | 8 (6) | 7 (5) | NS | ||
|
| 21 (16) | 29 (22) | 23 (16) | NS | ||
|
| 32 (23) | 0.001 | 87 (66) | 0.001 | 81 (54) | 0.001 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 71 (56) | 35 (25) | ||||
|
| 23 (18) | 51 (36) | ||||
|
| 6 (5) | 14 (10) | ||||
|
| 8 (8) | 22 (14) | ||||
|
| 4.06 (1.5) | 4.01 (1.4) | 3.97 (1.5) | |||
|
| 26 (20) | 0.043 | 43 (34) | 0.001 | 61 (43) | 0.001 |
|
| 14 (11) | 24 (18) | 19 (13) | NS | ||
|
| 11 (8) | 0.001 | 38 (30) | 0.011 | 29 (20) | 0.001 |
|
| 12 (9) | 0.003 | 33 (26) | NS | 21 (15) | 0.008 |
|
| 23 (17) | 27 (21) | 23 (16) | NS |
p 1 indicates significance of the difference between controls and CD patients who had not undergone rescective surgery.
p 2 indicates significance of the difference between controls and CD patients who had undergone rescective surgery.
p 3 indicates significance of the difference between the 3 groups.
Significances were calculated with ANOVA and Chi-square test. Post doc analyses were done with Fischers’ least significant difference test. NS = Not significant.
The difference in CD duration calculated with unpaired Student’s t-test.
Mean (SD) for the DMF-T/DMF-S index, Steptococcus mutans, volume of stimulated - and unstimulated saliva, the amount of dental plaque, and median (interquartile range) for Lactobacilli, in CD patients (who had not and had undergone resective surgery) and controls.
| Variable | Control groupn = 75 |
| CD PatientsNo resective surgeryn = 79 |
| CD PatientsResective surgeryn = 71 |
|
| DMF-T | 13.1 (6.5) | 11.2 (7.1) | 15.5 (8.3) | NS | ||
| DT | 1.1 (2) | 1.8 (2.9) | 2.2 (3.2) | NS | ||
| MT | 1.8 (3.3) | 1.8 (2.9) | 2.7 (4.1) | NS | ||
| FT | 10.12 (5.4) | 8.0 (5.4) | 10.6 (6.4) | NS | ||
| DMF-S | 36.5 (26.9) | NS | 33.1 (28.6) | 0.004 | 50.7 (36.2) | 0.014 |
| DS | 1.5 (2.2) | 2.7 (5.9) | 3.6 (7.6) | NS | ||
| MS | 8.5 (15.4) | 8.9 (13.7) | 13.3 (19.9) | NS | ||
| FS | 26.5 (19.4) | 22.6 (19.1) | 33.7 (24.5) | NS | ||
|
| ||||||
|
| 1000 (1000) | 0.008 | 10000 (99000) | 0.012 | 10000 (99000) | 0.011 |
|
| 0.9 (0.9) | NS | 1.5 (0.9) | 0.04 | 1.5 (1.1) | 0.016 |
| Stimulated saliva ml/min | 2.0 (0.8) | 2.2 (0.9) | 2.0 (0.9) | NS | ||
| Unstimulated saliva ml/min | 0.65 (0) | 0.62 (0.4) | 0.56(0) | NS | ||
| VPI | 22.6 (22.1) | 0.001 | 45.3 (25.9) | 0.001 | 53.7 (29.2) | 0.001 |
DMF-T = decayed, missed, filled teeth, DT = decayed teeth, MT = missing teeth, FT = filled teeth, DMF-S = decayed, missing, filled surface, DS = decayed surface, MS = missing surface, FS = filled surface, VPI = Visible Plaque index.
p 1 indicates statistical significance of the difference between controls and CD patients who had not undergone rescective surgery.
p 2 indicates statistical significance of the difference between controls and CD patients who had undergone rescective surgery.
p 3 indicates significances difference between all three groups.
Significances calculated with ANCOVA (analysis of covariance), adjusted for age, gender and smoking. Post hoc analyses done with Fischer’s least significant difference test. NS = Not significant.