Literature DB >> 24607672

Gender difference in the health risk perception of radiation from Fukushima in Japan: the role of hegemonic masculinity.

Rika Morioka1.   

Abstract

This paper presents the preliminary findings of gender difference in the perception of radiation risk in the aftermath of the Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan. In-depth interviews were conducted with the residents of Fukushima and other parts of Japan in November 2011 and July 2012. Compared to mothers, fathers in general expressed less concern for radiation. Fathers prioritized their responsibilities as the breadwinner for their families and saw radiation risk as a threat to economic stability and masculine identity. As a result, mothers' health concerns were dismissed, and they were prevented from taking preventive actions. The social norms in the dominant institutions such as corporations and the government influenced men's perception of radiation risk. The findings illustrate the importance of sociocultural context in which meanings of health risk are constructed.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Culture; Gender identity; Health activism; Japan; Masculinity; Nuclear disaster; Risk perception; Work

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24607672     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  9 in total

1.  Sex differences and risk behaviors among indoor tanners.

Authors:  Anne K Julian; Jeffrey W Bethel; Michelle C Odden; Sheryl Thorburn
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2016-03-19

2.  Towards a Long-Term Strategy for Voluntary-Based Internal Radiation Contamination Monitoring: A Population-Level Analysis of Monitoring Prevalence and Factors Associated with Monitoring Participation Behavior in Fukushima, Japan.

Authors:  Shuhei Nomura; Masaharu Tsubokura; Akihiko Ozaki; Michio Murakami; Susan Hodgson; Marta Blangiardo; Yoshitaka Nishikawa; Tomohiro Morita; Tomoyoshi Oikawa
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Current State and Problems of Radiation Risk Communication: Based on the Results of a 2012 Whole Village Survey.

Authors:  Yujiro Kuroda
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2017-02-24

4.  Reproductive health in the recent disasters of Iran: a management perspective.

Authors:  Sanaz Sohrabizadeh; Katayoun Jahangiri; Reza Khani Jazani
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Association between supportive attitude and adoptive practice of control strategy against COVID-19 amosng college students in China: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Dong Shen; Dan Liu; Miaochun Cai; Peiliang Chen; Zhenghe Wang; Yujie Zhang; Zhihao Li; Xiru Zhang; Xianbo Wu; Xingfen Yang; Chen Mao
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Closed but Not Protected: Excess Deaths Among the Amish and Mennonites During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Rachel E Stein; Katie E Corcoran; Corey J Colyer; Annette M Mackay; Sara K Guthrie
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2021-06-11

7.  Deepening inequalities: What did COVID-19 reveal about the gendered nature of academic work?

Authors:  Anna Maria Górska; Karolina Kulicka; Zuzanna Staniszewska; Dorota Dobija
Journal:  Gend Work Organ       Date:  2021-05-18

8.  COVID-19-Related Stressors and Mental Health Among Chinese College Students: A Moderated Mediation Model.

Authors:  Zaichao Han; Xiujuan Tang; Xiaoshan Li; Youtian Shen; Li Li; Jingjing Wang; Xiaowei Chen; Zhijun Hu
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-06-18

9.  Are dietary reports in a case-control study on thyroid cancer biased by risk perception of Chernobyl fallout?

Authors:  C Xhaard; A Dumas; V Souchard; Y Ren; F Borson-Chazot; G Sassolas; C Schvartz; M Colonna; B Lacour; A S Wonoroff; M Velten; E Clero; S Maillard; E Marrer; L Bailly; E Mariné Barjoan; M Schlumberger; J Orgiazzi; E Adjadj; C Rubino; A Bouville; V Drozdovitch; F de Vathaire
Journal:  Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 0.686

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.