Literature DB >> 24606791

Cultural targeting and tailoring of shared decision making technology: a theoretical framework for improving the effectiveness of patient decision aids in culturally diverse groups.

Dana L Alden1, John Friend2, Marilyn Schapira3, Anne Stiggelbout4.   

Abstract

Patient decision aids are known to positively impact outcomes critical to shared decision making (SDM), such as gist knowledge and decision preparedness. However, research on the potential improvement of these and other important outcomes through cultural targeting and tailoring of decision aids is very limited. This is the case despite extensive evidence supporting use of cultural targeting and tailoring to improve the effectiveness of health communications. Building on prominent psychological theory, we propose a two-stage framework incorporating cultural concepts into the design process for screening and treatment decision aids. The first phase recommends use of cultural constructs, such as collectivism and individualism, to differentially target patients whose cultures are known to vary on these dimensions. Decision aid targeting is operationalized through use of symbols and values that appeal to members of the given culture. Content dimensions within decision aids that appear particularly appropriate for targeting include surface level visual characteristics, language, beliefs, attitudes and values. The second phase of the framework is based on evidence that individuals vary in terms of how strongly cultural norms influence their approach to problem solving and decision making. In particular, the framework hypothesizes that differences in terms of access to cultural mindsets (e.g., access to interdependent versus independent self) can be measured up front and used to tailor decision aids. Thus, the second phase in the framework emphasizes the importance of not only targeting decision aid content, but also tailoring the information to the individual based on measurement of how strongly he/she is connected to dominant cultural mindsets. Overall, the framework provides a theory-based guide for researchers and practitioners who are interested in using cultural targeting and tailoring to develop and test decision aids that move beyond a "one-size fits all" approach and thereby, improve SDM in our multicultural world.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Culture; Health disparities; Patient decision aids; Shared decision making; Tailoring; Targeting

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24606791     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  27 in total

1.  Other Ways of Knowing.

Authors:  Negin Hajizadeh; Melissa J Basile; Andrzej Kozikowski; Meredith Akerman; Tara Liberman; Thomas McGinn; Michael A Diefenbach
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 2.  Informatics Systems and Tools to Facilitate Patient-centered Care Coordination.

Authors:  G Demiris; L Kneale
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2015-08-13

3.  Developing a scale to assess health regulatory focus.

Authors:  Rebecca A Ferrer; Isaac M Lipkus; Jennifer L Cerully; Colleen M McBride; James A Shepperd; William M P Klein
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  'Lock to Live': development of a firearm storage decision aid to enhance lethal means counselling and prevent suicide.

Authors:  Marian E Betz; Christopher E Knoepke; Bonnie Siry; Ashley Clement; Deborah Azrael; Stephanie Ernestus; Daniel D Matlock
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 2.399

Review 5.  A Review of Shared Decision-Making and Patient Decision Aids in Radiation Oncology.

Authors:  Kristina Demas Woodhouse; Katie Tremont; Anil Vachani; Marilyn M Schapira; Neha Vapiwala; Charles B Simone; Abigail T Berman
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  What is a good medical decision? A research agenda guided by perspectives from multiple stakeholders.

Authors:  Jada G Hamilton; Sarah E Lillie; Dana L Alden; Laura Scherer; Megan Oser; Christine Rini; Miho Tanaka; John Baleix; Mikki Brewster; Simon Craddock Lee; Mary K Goldstein; Robert M Jacobson; Ronald E Myers; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Erika A Waters
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2016-08-26

7.  Supportive Care: Communication Strategies to Improve Cultural Competence in Shared Decision Making.

Authors:  Edwina A Brown; Hilary L Bekker; Sara N Davison; Jonathan Koffman; Jane O Schell
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Factors Influencing Pregnant Women's Use of Patient Decision Aids and Decision Making on Prenatal Screening: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Razieh Zahedi; Leila Nemati-Anaraki; Shahram Sedghi; Mamak Shariat
Journal:  J Family Reprod Health       Date:  2020-12

9.  Development of patient decision support tools for motor neuron disease using stakeholder consultation: a study protocol.

Authors:  Anne Hogden; David Greenfield; Jashelle Caga; Xiongcai Cai
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Identification of Barriers to Stroke Awareness and Risk Factor Management Unique to Hispanics.

Authors:  Marina Martinez; Nitin Prabhakar; Kendra Drake; Bruce Coull; Jenny Chong; Leslie Ritter; Chelsea Kidwell
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.