G Demiris1, L Kneale. 1. George Demiris PhD, FACMI, University of Washington, BNHS Box 357266, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA, Tel: +1 206 221 3866, Fax: +1 206 543 4771, E-mail: gdemiris@uw.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: There is a growing international focus on patient- centered care. A model designed to facilitate this type of care in the primary care setting is the patient-centered medical home. This model of care strives to be patient-focused, comprehensive, team-based, coordinated, accessible, and focused on quality and safety of care. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to identify the current status and future trends of patient-centered care and the role of informatics systems and tools in facilitating this model of care. METHODS: In this paper we review recent scientific literature of the past four years to identify trends and state of current evidence when it comes to patient-centered care overall, and more specifically medical homes. RESULTS: There are several studies that indicate growth and development in seven informatics areas within patient-centered care, namely clinical decision support, registries, team care, care transitions, personal health records, telehealth, and measurement. In some cases we are still lacking large randomized clinical trials and the evidence base is not always solid, but findings strongly indicate the potential of informatics to support patient-centered care. CONCLUSION: Current evidence indicates that advancements have been made in implementing and evaluating patient-centered care models. Technical, legal, and practical challenges still remain. Further examination of the impact of patient-centered informatics tools and systems on clinical outcomes is needed.
INTRODUCTION: There is a growing international focus on patient- centered care. A model designed to facilitate this type of care in the primary care setting is the patient-centered medical home. This model of care strives to be patient-focused, comprehensive, team-based, coordinated, accessible, and focused on quality and safety of care. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to identify the current status and future trends of patient-centered care and the role of informatics systems and tools in facilitating this model of care. METHODS: In this paper we review recent scientific literature of the past four years to identify trends and state of current evidence when it comes to patient-centered care overall, and more specifically medical homes. RESULTS: There are several studies that indicate growth and development in seven informatics areas within patient-centered care, namely clinical decision support, registries, team care, care transitions, personal health records, telehealth, and measurement. In some cases we are still lacking large randomized clinical trials and the evidence base is not always solid, but findings strongly indicate the potential of informatics to support patient-centered care. CONCLUSION: Current evidence indicates that advancements have been made in implementing and evaluating patient-centered care models. Technical, legal, and practical challenges still remain. Further examination of the impact of patient-centered informatics tools and systems on clinical outcomes is needed.
Entities:
Keywords:
Patient-centered care; clinical; decision support systems; personal health records; registries; telehealth
Authors: Jeffrey A Alexander; Michael Paustian; Christopher G Wise; Lee A Green; Michael D Fetters; Margaret Mason; Darline K El Reda Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2013 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Adam Darkins; Stephen Kendall; Ellen Edmonson; Michele Young; Pamela Stressel Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2014-05-19 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Peggy J Wagner; James Dias; Shalon Howard; Kristina W Kintziger; Matthew F Hudson; Yoon-Ho Seol; Pat Sodomka Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2012-01-10 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: David B Reuben; Leslie C Evertson; Neil S Wenger; Katherine Serrano; Joshua Chodosh; Linda Ercoli; Zaldy S Tan Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2013-12-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Robert J Stenger; Jeanene Smith; J Bart McMullan; Glenn S Rodriguez; David A Dorr; Mary Minniti; Arthur Jaffe; David Pollack; Mitchell Anderson; Charles M Kilo; John W Saultz Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2012 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Alisha P Chaudhry; Ronald A Hankey; Vinod C Kaggal; Huzefa Bhopalwala; David A Liedl; Paul W Wennberg; Thom W Rooke; Christopher G Scott; Magali P Disdier Moulder; Abby K Hendricks; Ana I Casanegra; Robert D McBane; Jane L Shellum; Iftikhar J Kullo; Rick A Nishimura; Rajeev Chaudhry; Adelaide M Arruda-Olson Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes Date: 2020-11-28
Authors: Jorie M Butler; Bryan Gibson; Olga V Patterson; Laura J Damschroder; Corrinne H Halls; Daniel W Denhalter; Matthew H Samore; Haojia Li; Yue Zhang; Scott L DuVall Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2022-03-12 Impact factor: 2.796