Literature DB >> 24606731

The founding charter of the Genomic Observatories Network.

Neil Davies1, Dawn Field, Linda Amaral-Zettler, Melody S Clark, John Deck, Alexei Drummond, Daniel P Faith, Jonathan Geller, Jack Gilbert, Frank Oliver Glöckner, Penny R Hirsch, Jo-Ann Leong, Chris Meyer, Matthias Obst, Serge Planes, Chris Scholin, Alfried P Vogler, Ruth D Gates, Rob Toonen, Véronique Berteaux-Lecellier, Michèle Barbier, Katherine Barker, Stefan Bertilsson, Mesude Bicak, Matthew J Bietz, Jason Bobe, Levente Bodrossy, Angel Borja, Jonathan Coddington, Jed Fuhrman, Gunnar Gerdts, Rosemary Gillespie, Kelly Goodwin, Paul C Hanson, Jean-Marc Hero, David Hoekman, Janet Jansson, Christian Jeanthon, Rebecca Kao, Anna Klindworth, Rob Knight, Renzo Kottmann, Michelle S Koo, Georgios Kotoulas, Andrew J Lowe, Viggó Thór Marteinsson, Folker Meyer, Norman Morrison, David D Myrold, Evangelos Pafilis, Stephanie Parker, John Jacob Parnell, Paraskevi N Polymenakou, Sujeevan Ratnasingham, George K Roderick, Naiara Rodriguez-Ezpeleta, Karsten Schonrogge, Nathalie Simon, Nathalie J Valette-Silver, Yuri P Springer, Graham N Stone, Steve Stones-Havas, Susanna-Assunta Sansone, Kate M Thibault, Patricia Wecker, Antje Wichels, John C Wooley, Tetsukazu Yahara, Adriana Zingone.   

Abstract

The co-authors of this paper hereby state their intention to work together to launch the Genomic Observatories Network (GOs Network) for which this document will serve as its Founding Charter. We define a Genomic Observatory as an ecosystem and/or site subject to long-term scientific research, including (but not limited to) the sustained study of genomic biodiversity from single-celled microbes to multicellular organisms.An international group of 64 scientists first published the call for a global network of Genomic Observatories in January 2012. The vision for such a network was expanded in a subsequent paper and developed over a series of meetings in Bremen (Germany), Shenzhen (China), Moorea (French Polynesia), Oxford (UK), Pacific Grove (California, USA), Washington (DC, USA), and London (UK). While this community-building process continues, here we express our mutual intent to establish the GOs Network formally, and to describe our shared vision for its future. The views expressed here are ours alone as individual scientists, and do not necessarily represent those of the institutions with which we are affiliated.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24606731      PMCID: PMC3995929          DOI: 10.1186/2047-217X-3-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gigascience        ISSN: 2047-217X            Impact factor:   6.524


Background

Key outcomes of 21st century science include an Earth with its essential life support systems intact, and a planet where human society has achieved sustainable development. Achieving these challenges, however, requires a greatly improved understanding of human interactions with the natural environment. Towards that end, the GOs Network aims to observe DNA sequences -- the biocode -- across the principal levels of biological organization (cell, organism, ecosystem) up to the planetary genome [1,2]. Our approach is to apply genomic technologies to study the flux of genetic variation within these nested scales of biological function. We will inventory genomic biodiversity and map its distribution over time and space. To address the processes that generate and maintain this diversity, we will link the genomic information to physico-chemical, ecological, and socioeconomic data. We will work with the broader scientific community to build models of how genomic biodiversity contributes to ecosystem services, evolutionary potential, and ecological resilience.

Main text

What is a Genomic Observatory?

Some of the terms we use here require definition (See Table 1), since not everyone in the community uses them in the same way. Helping to solidify a shared terminology in such a fast moving field is one contribution of the GOs Network. Our intention here, however, is merely to clarify what we mean in the limited context of this document. Only time will tell whether these terms, or our definitions of them, become broadly accepted. The definitions are deliberately concise and in some cases require fuller explanation, which we plan to provide in a future publication.
Table 1

Definitions

Biocode
The totality of DNA sequences in a given unit of biological organization, such as a: cell (e.g., the Yeast Biocode includes both its nuclear and mitochondrial genomes); organism (e.g., the Human Biocode includes both the Human Genome and the Human Microbiome); ecosystem (e.g., the Moorea Biocode includes all the genomes on the island); planet (e.g., the Earth Biocode includes all the genomes on the planet)
Biocoding the earth
The aspirational target of sequencing every genome on the planet. While a theoretical goal that is clearly unattainable in practice, strategic genome sequencing (e.g., as proposed by the Global Genome Initiative http://www.mnh.si.edu/ggi/) can cover the major variation found among genomes on Earth
Planetary genome
A special case of the biocode: the sum of all genomes that exist on Earth at a given time. (N.B. (nota bene): the existence of a planetary genome neither implies that natural selection acts at this level, nor that the phenotype of the planetary genome is adapted for its preservation and propagation)
Genomic biodiversity
The genetic variation found among genomes
Biodiversity genomics
The field of scientific study that maps genomic biodiversity over space and time, investigates the functional consequences of this variation, and seeks to explain how it is generated and maintained
Ecosystem
A biological community of interacting organisms in their physical and chemical environment
Genomic Observatory
An ecosystem and/or site subject to long-term scientific research, including (but not limited to) the sustained study of genomic biodiversity from single-celled microbes to multicellular organisms
Genomic Observatories (GOs) Network
A network (i) of ecosystems and sites, which are often already part of existing scientific networks, (ii) of researchers, who are intensively studying one or more GOs, and (iii) of institutions, infrastructures, and initiatives, whose work aligns with the GOs Network’s mission
Future ‘omics (futuromics)The preservation of biological samples for eventual study of their nucleotide and protein sequences through the techniques of genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and other ‘omics’ analyses
Definitions Most importantly, we define a ‘Genomic Observatory’ as an ecosystem, and/or a site within an ecosystem, that is the subject of long-term scientific research, including (but not limited to) the sustained study of genomic biodiversity. An observatory is the institutionalized act of observing, and so for a given ecosystem (and/or site) to be recognized as a Genomic Observatory, one or more institutions (e.g., field station, marine laboratory, museum, university, etc.) should express, and preferably have demonstrated, their long-term commitment to the scientific study of that system’s genomic biodiversity. One important feature of this definition is that it allows the establishment of new genomic observatories, while recognizing the value of those that have existing time-series data already.

Mission and vision

The mission of the GOs Network is to work towards Biocoding the Earth; integrating DNA data into Earth observing systems and eventually building a global Genomic Observatory within the Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS) [3]. The vision of the GOs Network is to: • Advance the science of biodiversity genomics through a global network of premier research organizations generating well-contextualized genomic biodiversity observations compliant with global data standards. • Coordinate a set of long-term DNA-centric research programs (actions) at local, regional, and global scales that help develop and implement common standards and best practices for quantifying genomic biodiversity and mapping biotic interactions over time. • Partner with natural history museums, repositories, and bio-banks, (e.g., members of the Global Genome Biodiversity Network (GGBN) [4]) to preserve well-contextualized samples (environmental samples and organismal specimens) for future ‘omics analysis, including whole genomes and metagenomes. • Work with the broader scientific community to develop predictive models of biodiversity, ecosystem services and evolutionary potential [5] - especially with respect to global change. • Provide training, technical assistance, resources, and best practice guides as a learning platform for individuals and organizations wishing to carry out genomic observations at genomic observatories and beyond.

Governance and membership

The GOs Network is a collaboration of the Genomic Standards Consortium (GSC) and the Group on Earth Observations (GEO) through its Biodiversity Observation Network (GEO BON) [6]. The GSC is incubating the GOs Network, and GEO BON has listed it as a key deliverable. Through this pathway, the GOs Network will also contribute to the new Future Earth program [7] for global sustainability research, thus promoting links to other scientific disciplines and helping forge partnerships with policy makers and other stakeholders. Working under GEO reflects our mission of integrating genomic data into GEOSS, while working under GSC ensures that these data are fit for that purpose. Initially, a GOs Network Board, including representatives of key stakeholders, will administer the GOs Network and set its strategic objectives (this charter). One of the first tasks of the Board is to define criteria for membership of the GOs Network and to put in place a governance mechanism and operating procedures. All co-authors of this article are considered “founding individual members” of the GOs Network.

Research coordination activities

The GOs Network will focus on coordinating activities, such as (1) Organizing an annual meeting (GOs Network Conference) involving all network members and other interested parties worldwide; (2) Co-organizing regional and thematic meetings (GOs Network Workshops) in collaboration with partner organizations; (3) Maintaining a online registry of Genomic Observatories; (4) Participating in standards development efforts, for example, through the Genomic Biodiversity Working Group (GBWG) - a collaboration of the GSC and the Biodiversity Information Standards organization (TDWG.org); and (5) contributing to GEO and GEOSS, particularly through the cross-cutting Working Group 1 (Genetics) of GEO BON.

Actions

The GOs Network will support actions aiming to build a coordinated and well-contextualized set of genomic biodiversity observations and archived vouchers (specimens and environmental samples). In particular, the GOs Network aims to provide a roadmap for ecosystem-based Genomic Biodiversity Assessment Reports as one of its contributions to GEO BON. These reports might start with a simple checklist of species, building up to a DNA barcode library and eventually to metagenomic inventories. The former will contribute towards the International Barcode of Life (IBOL) initiative and work towards the latter is already underway through the GOs Network’s first action, Ocean Sampling Day (OSD) [8], an initiative of the EU FP7 Project Micro B3 to carry out coordinated sampling of marine microbial communities on June 21, 2014. The GOs Network will help expand the scope of OSD to include new geographies, sampling approaches, taxa and environments, and to maintain this action beyond 2014. OSD represents the GOs Network’s first attempt to aggregate participating sites into a global genomic observatory and to begin functioning as a distributed major research infrastructure. The GOs Network will build on OSD to support development of Marine Biodiversity Observation Networks [9], particularly through the coordinated actions of leading marine Genomic Observatories.

Biocode commons

The GOs Network intends to adopt the Biocode Commons as its informatics stack - a primary forum for sharing tools that support genomic observations from collection through analysis and publication, bringing together developers, scientists and standards (see: http://biocodecommons.org/). Eventually, the Biocode Commons might aim to provide a one-stop shop for genomic biodiversity data and scientific workflows from genomic observatories. We believe that wherever feasible these data should be fully compliant with global data standards, machine-readable, and (while respecting legitimate concerns for privacy and for the protection of endangered species) accessible without restriction to the scientific community [10].

Conclusions

Genomic biodiversity represents the foundational data layer for biological research. The Genomic Observatories (GOs) Network brings together premier research sites to develop ‘systems-based’ approaches that integrate genomics into ecological, evolutionary, and socio-environmental studies. This paper outlines the network’s mission and seeks broad community participation in this collaborative effort.

Abbreviations

GEO: Group on Earth Observations; GEO BON: Group on Earth Observation Biodiversity Observation Network; GEOSS: Global Earth Observation System of Systems; GGI: Global Genome Initiative; GGBN: Global Genome Biodiversity Network; GSC: Genomic Standards Consortium; IBOL: International Barcode of Life; OSD: Ocean Sampling Day.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

ND and DF drafted the original text with detailed input from GOs Steering Committee members (LAZ, MC, JD, AD, DPF, JG, JG, FOG, PH, JL, CM, MO, SP, CS, APV, VBL, RG, and RT) and broad consultation with all the co-authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
  3 in total

1.  Sequencing data: A genomic network to monitor Earth.

Authors:  Neil Davies; Dawn Field
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Prepublication data sharing.

Authors:  Ewan Birney; Thomas J Hudson; Eric D Green; Chris Gunter; Sean Eddy; Jane Rogers; Jennifer R Harris; S Dusko Ehrlich; Rolf Apweiler; Christopher P Austin; Lisa Berglund; Martin Bobrow; Chas Bountra; Anthony J Brookes; Anne Cambon-Thomsen; Nigel P Carter; Rex L Chisholm; Jorge L Contreras; Robert M Cooke; William L Crosby; Ken Dewar; Richard Durbin; Stephanie O M Dyke; Joseph R Ecker; Khaled El Emam; Lars Feuk; Stacey B Gabriel; John Gallacher; William M Gelbart; Antoni Granell; Francisco Guarner; Tim Hubbard; Scott A Jackson; Jennifer L Jennings; Yann Joly; Steven M Jones; Jane Kaye; Karen L Kennedy; Bartha Maria Knoppers; Nikos C Kyrpides; William W Lowrance; Jingchu Luo; John J MacKay; Luis Martín-Rivera; W Richard McCombie; John D McPherson; Linda Miller; Webb Miller; Don Moerman; Vincent Mooser; Cynthia C Morton; James M Ostell; B F Francis Ouellette; Julian Parkhill; Parminder S Raina; Christopher Rawlings; Steven E Scherer; Stephen W Scherer; Paul N Schofield; Christoph W Sensen; Victoria C Stodden; Michael R Sussman; Toshihiro Tanaka; Janet Thornton; Tatsuhiko Tsunoda; David Valle; Eero I Vuorio; Neil M Walker; Susan Wallace; George Weinstock; William B Whitman; Kim C Worley; Cathy Wu; Jiayan Wu; Jun Yu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  A call for an international network of genomic observatories (GOs).

Authors:  Neil Davies; Chris Meyer; Jack A Gilbert; Linda Amaral-Zettler; John Deck; Mesude Bicak; Philippe Rocca-Serra; Susanna Assunta-Sansone; Kathy Willis; Dawn Field
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 6.524

  3 in total
  16 in total

1.  Advancing Genomics through the Global Invertebrate Genomics Alliance (GIGA).

Authors:  Christian R Voolstra; Gert Wörheide; Jose V Lopez
Journal:  Invertebr Syst       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Recommendations for connecting molecular sequence and biodiversity research infrastructures through ELIXIR.

Authors:  Robert M Waterhouse; Anne-Françoise Adam-Blondon; Donat Agosti; Petr Baldrian; Bachir Balech; Erwan Corre; Robert P Davey; Henrik Lantz; Graziano Pesole; Christian Quast; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Niels Raes; Anna Sandionigi; Monica Santamaria; Wouter Addink; Jiri Vohradsky; Amandine Nunes-Jorge; Nils Peder Willassen; Jerry Lanfear
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2021-12-03

3.  Toward global integration of biodiversity big data: a harmonized metabarcode data generation module for terrestrial arthropods.

Authors:  Paula Arribas; Carmelo Andújar; Kristine Bohmann; Jeremy R deWaard; Evan P Economo; Vasco Elbrecht; Stefan Geisen; Marta Goberna; Henrik Krehenwinkel; Vojtech Novotny; Lucie Zinger; Thomas J Creedy; Emmanouil Meramveliotakis; Víctor Noguerales; Isaac Overcast; Hélène Morlon; Anna Papadopoulou; Alfried P Vogler; Brent C Emerson
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 7.658

4.  Composition and Biogeography of Planktonic Pro- and Eukaryotic Communities in the Atlantic Ocean: Primer Choice Matters.

Authors:  Felix Milke; Selene Sanchez-Garcia; Leon Dlugosch; Jesse McNichol; Jed Fuhrman; Meinhard Simon; Irene Wagner-Döbler
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 6.064

5.  The ocean sampling day consortium.

Authors:  Anna Kopf; Mesude Bicak; Renzo Kottmann; Julia Schnetzer; Ivaylo Kostadinov; Katja Lehmann; Antonio Fernandez-Guerra; Christian Jeanthon; Eyal Rahav; Matthias Ullrich; Antje Wichels; Gunnar Gerdts; Paraskevi Polymenakou; Giorgos Kotoulas; Rania Siam; Rehab Z Abdallah; Eva C Sonnenschein; Thierry Cariou; Fergal O'Gara; Stephen Jackson; Sandi Orlic; Michael Steinke; Julia Busch; Bernardo Duarte; Isabel Caçador; João Canning-Clode; Oleksandra Bobrova; Viggo Marteinsson; Eyjolfur Reynisson; Clara Magalhães Loureiro; Gian Marco Luna; Grazia Marina Quero; Carolin R Löscher; Anke Kremp; Marie E DeLorenzo; Lise Øvreås; Jennifer Tolman; Julie LaRoche; Antonella Penna; Marc Frischer; Timothy Davis; Barker Katherine; Christopher P Meyer; Sandra Ramos; Catarina Magalhães; Florence Jude-Lemeilleur; Ma Leopoldina Aguirre-Macedo; Shiao Wang; Nicole Poulton; Scott Jones; Rachel Collin; Jed A Fuhrman; Pascal Conan; Cecilia Alonso; Noga Stambler; Kelly Goodwin; Michael M Yakimov; Federico Baltar; Levente Bodrossy; Jodie Van De Kamp; Dion Mf Frampton; Martin Ostrowski; Paul Van Ruth; Paul Malthouse; Simon Claus; Klaas Deneudt; Jonas Mortelmans; Sophie Pitois; David Wallom; Ian Salter; Rodrigo Costa; Declan C Schroeder; Mahrous M Kandil; Valentina Amaral; Florencia Biancalana; Rafael Santana; Maria Luiza Pedrotti; Takashi Yoshida; Hiroyuki Ogata; Tim Ingleton; Kate Munnik; Naiara Rodriguez-Ezpeleta; Veronique Berteaux-Lecellier; Patricia Wecker; Ibon Cancio; Daniel Vaulot; Christina Bienhold; Hassan Ghazal; Bouchra Chaouni; Soumya Essayeh; Sara Ettamimi; El Houcine Zaid; Noureddine Boukhatem; Abderrahim Bouali; Rajaa Chahboune; Said Barrijal; Mohammed Timinouni; Fatima El Otmani; Mohamed Bennani; Marianna Mea; Nadezhda Todorova; Ventzislav Karamfilov; Petra Ten Hoopen; Guy Cochrane; Stephane L'Haridon; Kemal Can Bizsel; Alessandro Vezzi; Federico M Lauro; Patrick Martin; Rachelle M Jensen; Jamie Hinks; Susan Gebbels; Riccardo Rosselli; Fabio De Pascale; Riccardo Schiavon; Antonina Dos Santos; Emilie Villar; Stéphane Pesant; Bruno Cataletto; Francesca Malfatti; Ranjith Edirisinghe; Jorge A Herrera Silveira; Michele Barbier; Valentina Turk; Tinkara Tinta; Wayne J Fuller; Ilkay Salihoglu; Nedime Serakinci; Mahmut Cerkez Ergoren; Eileen Bresnan; Juan Iriberri; Paul Anders Fronth Nyhus; Edvardsen Bente; Hans Erik Karlsen; Peter N Golyshin; Josep M Gasol; Snejana Moncheva; Nina Dzhembekova; Zackary Johnson; Christopher David Sinigalliano; Maribeth Louise Gidley; Adriana Zingone; Roberto Danovaro; George Tsiamis; Melody S Clark; Ana Cristina Costa; Monia El Bour; Ana M Martins; R Eric Collins; Anne-Lise Ducluzeau; Jonathan Martinez; Mark J Costello; Linda A Amaral-Zettler; Jack A Gilbert; Neil Davies; Dawn Field; Frank Oliver Glöckner
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 6.524

6.  Biogeographic patterns of bacterial microdiversity in Arctic deep-sea sediments (HAUSGARTEN, Fram Strait).

Authors:  Pier Luigi Buttigieg; Alban Ramette
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  The Genomic Observatories Metadatabase (GeOMe): A new repository for field and sampling event metadata associated with genetic samples.

Authors:  John Deck; Michelle R Gaither; Rodney Ewing; Christopher E Bird; Neil Davies; Christopher Meyer; Cynthia Riginos; Robert J Toonen; Eric D Crandall
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Evaluating a multigene environmental DNA approach for biodiversity assessment.

Authors:  Alexei J Drummond; Richard D Newcomb; Thomas R Buckley; Dong Xie; Andrew Dopheide; Benjamin Cm Potter; Joseph Heled; Howard A Ross; Leah Tooman; Stefanie Grosser; Duckchul Park; Nicholas J Demetras; Mark I Stevens; James C Russell; Sandra H Anderson; Anna Carter; Nicola Nelson
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 6.524

9.  The common oceanographer: crowdsourcing the collection of oceanographic data.

Authors:  Federico M Lauro; Svend Jacob Senstius; Jay Cullen; Russell Neches; Rachelle M Jensen; Mark V Brown; Aaron E Darling; Michael Givskov; Diane McDougald; Ron Hoeke; Martin Ostrowski; Gayle K Philip; Ian T Paulsen; Joseph J Grzymski
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Recurrent patterns of microdiversity in a temperate coastal marine environment.

Authors:  Meghan Chafee; Antonio Fernàndez-Guerra; Pier Luigi Buttigieg; Gunnar Gerdts; A Murat Eren; Hanno Teeling; Rudolf I Amann
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 10.302

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.