Literature DB >> 24606294

The influence of informational masking on speech perception and pupil response in adults with hearing impairment.

Thomas Koelewijn1, Adriana A Zekveld1, Joost M Festen1, Sophia E Kramer1.   

Abstract

A recent pupillometry study on adults with normal hearing indicates that the pupil response during speech perception (cognitive processing load) is strongly affected by the type of speech masker. The current study extends these results by recording the pupil response in 32 participants with hearing impairment (mean age 59 yr) while they were listening to sentences masked by fluctuating noise or a single-talker. Efforts were made to improve audibility of all sounds by means of spectral shaping. Additionally, participants performed tests measuring verbal working memory capacity, inhibition of interfering information in working memory, and linguistic closure. The results showed worse speech reception thresholds for speech masked by single-talker speech compared to fluctuating noise. In line with previous results for participants with normal hearing, the pupil response was larger when listening to speech masked by a single-talker compared to fluctuating noise. Regression analysis revealed that larger working memory capacity and better inhibition of interfering information related to better speech reception thresholds, but these variables did not account for inter-individual differences in the pupil response. In conclusion, people with hearing impairment show more cognitive load during speech processing when there is interfering speech compared to fluctuating noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24606294     DOI: 10.1121/1.4863198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  18 in total

1.  Working memory training to improve speech perception in noise across languages.

Authors:  Erin M Ingvalson; Sumitrajit Dhar; Patrick C M Wong; Hanjun Liu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Word Identification With Temporally Interleaved Competing Sounds by Younger and Older Adult Listeners.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Sarah F Poissant; Gabrielle R Merchant
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  The Effects of Noise and Reverberation on Listening Effort in Adults With Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Erin M Picou; Julia Gordon; Todd A Ricketts
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 4.  Eyes and ears: Using eye tracking and pupillometry to understand challenges to speech recognition.

Authors:  Kristin J Van Engen; Drew J McLaughlin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  The Effect of Aging and Priming on Same/Different Judgments Between Text and Partially Masked Speech.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Jenna Terpening; Angela C Costanzi; Karen S Helfer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Comparing methods of analysis in pupillometry: application to the assessment of listening effort in hearing-impaired patients.

Authors:  Lou Seropian; Mathieu Ferschneider; Fanny Cholvy; Christophe Micheyl; Aurélie Bidet-Caulet; Annie Moulin
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-06-03

Review 7.  Autonomic Nervous System Responses to Hearing-Related Demand and Evaluative Threat.

Authors:  Carol L Mackersie; Lucia Kearney
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 1.493

8.  Tracking Cognitive Spare Capacity During Speech Perception With EEG/ERP: Effects of Cognitive Load and Sentence Predictability.

Authors:  Cynthia R Hunter
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG.

Authors:  Kelly Miles; Catherine McMahon; Isabelle Boisvert; Ronny Ibrahim; Peter de Lissa; Petra Graham; Björn Lyxell
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Exploring the Link Between Cognitive Abilities and Speech Recognition in the Elderly Under Different Listening Conditions.

Authors:  Theresa Nuesse; Rike Steenken; Tobias Neher; Inga Holube
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.