Literature DB >> 24605001

The influences of implant angulations in one and two directions on the retentive properties of overdenture attachments: an in vitro study.

Parsa Atashrazm1, Mohammad Hossein Dashti2, Leila Zamani Alavijeh3, Samira Azarmaeh4, Sayena Mahdizadeh4.   

Abstract

Implant alignment is an important factor in overdentures retained by solitary abutments. In this study, the effect of implant angulations in two directions, on the amount of retention of attachments was evaluated. Ninety models were divided into nine groups of two blocks each; one for two implants and one for two attachments. The implants were placed either parallel to, at 5°, or at 10° relative to the reference plane. The attachments were related to the implants with a 0, 5, or 10° angulations. The direction of the implant was either labial or distolabial. The initial and the subsequent retention values of each sample were measured after each 500 cycles of insertion and removal. The measurements were repeated for five consecutive 3,000 cycles, and the results were analyzed by means of one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests. Group 9 with a 10° distolabial tilt of the implants and of their attachments showed the highest initial retention, whereas group 1 with a 0° angulations and parallel attachments showed the lowest (6.9 ± 0.28 and 3.88 ± 0.19 N, respectively). The initial retention and the final loss of retention was significantly higher in those groups with the distolabial tilt of the implants (p < 0.05). Within the limitations of this study, it was demonstrated that the more divergent the implants and their retentive components, the higher their initial retention and the lower their final retention may be.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Implant angulations; Implant-retained overdentures; Retentive attachments

Year:  2013        PMID: 24605001      PMCID: PMC3935040          DOI: 10.1007/s13191-013-0272-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc        ISSN: 0972-4052


  17 in total

1.  Mandibular implant-retained overdentures: a literature review.

Authors:  S J Sadowsky
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  Orientation of retentive matrices on spherical attachments independent of implant parallelism.

Authors:  A S Wiemeyer; J R Agar; R B Kazemi
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Implant angulation: a measurement technique, implant overdenture maintenance, and the influence of surgical experience.

Authors:  J N Walton; S C Huizinga; C C Peck
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.681

4.  Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.

Authors:  Vicki C Petropoulos; Woollcott Smith
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 5.  Annual review of selected dental literature: report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry.

Authors:  Edward P Allen; Stephen C Bayne; Alan H Brodine; Robert J Cronin; Terence E Donovan; John C Kois; James B Summitt
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 6.  Magnetic retention in prosthetic dentistry.

Authors:  A Damien Walmsley
Journal:  Dent Update       Date:  2002-11

7.  Adhesion of foods to teeth.

Authors:  R C CALDWELL
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1962 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.116

8.  Effect of implant angulation upon retention of overdenture attachments.

Authors:  Michael P Gulizio; John R Agar; J Robert Kelly; Thomas D Taylor
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Sergio M Ortegón; Geoffrey A Thompson; John R Agar; Thomas D Taylor; Dimitri Perdikis
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 10.  The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success.

Authors:  T Albrektsson; G Zarb; P Worthington; A R Eriksson
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.804

View more
  1 in total

1.  In vitro retention force measurement for three different attachment systems for implant-retained overdenture.

Authors:  Kareem Mohammed Reda; Ibrahim Ramadan El-Torky; Mohamed Nabeel El-Gendy
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.