Literature DB >> 2460496

Semiquantitation of bacteria in sputum gram stains.

P N Valenstein1.   

Abstract

In many clinical laboratories, bacteria seen in Gram-stained sputum smears are reported semiquantitatively, using a three- or four-category scale consisting of ratings such as numerous, moderate, rare, and none seen. The consistency with which these categories are assigned was evaluated by repeatedly presenting coded smears to seven experienced microbiology technologists. Technologists rated the same smear twice, pairs of smears prepared from the same specimen, and smears prepared after specimen refrigeration. Agreement was assessed with the weighted kappa test. Semiquantitation of gram-negative rods, gram-positive diplococci, and gram-positive cocci in clusters all showed poor reproducibility (kappa = 0.32, 0.34, and 0.17, respectively). Twenty-four percent of paired ratings differed by two or more categories. Lack of reproducibility was due mainly to the inability of the technologists to render a consistent rating when viewing the same slide on separate occasions (P less than 0.001). Variation in the rating styles of different technologists, differences between smears prepared from the same specimen, and specimen refrigeration tended to further decrease the consistency of ratings, but the reductions were not statistically significant. The quantity of potentially pathogenic bacteria in sputum smears is not estimated consistently with standard microscopy procedures and should not be reported.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2460496      PMCID: PMC266718          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.26.9.1791-1794.1988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  7 in total

1.  Microscopic and baceriologic analysis of expectorated sputum.

Authors:  P R Murray; J A Washington
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Nonvalue of sputum culture in the management of lower respiratory tract infections.

Authors:  J R Lentino; D A Lucks
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Quality assurance of gram-stained direct smears.

Authors:  R C Bartlett; J Tetreault; J Evers; J Officer; J Derench
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Misinformation from sputum cultures without microscopic examination.

Authors:  H S Heineman; J K Chawla; W M Lopton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  The nonvalue of sputum culture in the diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia.

Authors:  E Barrett-Connor
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1971-06

6.  Effects of overnight refrigeration on the microscopic evaluation of sputum.

Authors:  R L Penn; R Silberman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Sputum gram stain assessment in community-acquired bacteremic pneumonia.

Authors:  R Gleckman; J DeVita; D Hibert; C Pelletier; R Martin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 5.948

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Reproducibility of interpretation of Gram-stained vaginal smears for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  T Mazzulli; A E Simor; D E Low
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Diagnosis of bronchopulmonary infections by quantification of microflora.

Authors:  F Pirali; M Longo; M Gelmi; D Colombrita; G Ravizzola; G Pinsi; L Peroni; N Manca; A Turano
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 3.  Diagnostic test for etiologic agents of community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  John G Bartlett
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.982

Review 4.  Laboratory diagnosis of community-acquired lower respiratory tract infection.

Authors:  M A Saubolle; P P McKellar
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.982

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.