Literature DB >> 6699145

Effects of overnight refrigeration on the microscopic evaluation of sputum.

R L Penn, R Silberman.   

Abstract

Microscopic evaluation of sputum permits selection of specimens suitable for culture, assessment of likely pathogens, and the best interpretation of culture results. We prospectively evaluated 50 sputum specimens which were promptly submitted to our clinical laboratory; smears and cultures were performed both immediately and after 20 h of refrigeration. Specimens were grouped according to the numbers of squamous epithelial cells and neutrophils per low-power field present on coded Gram-stained smears. The numbers of bacteria in five oil immersion fields were used to characterize smears for predominant, mixed, or scanty forms. After refrigeration, only three specimens changed group from a definite loss of squamous epithelial cells, and only two changed group from a definite loss of neutrophils. Based on cellular composition, the majority of samples would have been processed identically both before and after refrigeration. In contrast, organism forms detected on smears and their relative quantities were dramatically altered after refrigeration. A predominant smear form was gained in 11 and lost in 8 refrigerated specimens. The frequent changes on smears observed overall resulted from both increases and decreases in numbers of bacteria and yeasts. The majority of sputum culture results were insignificantly affected by the refrigeration of specimens. We conclude that 20 h of refrigeration renders sputum useless for the microscopic evaluation of potential pathogens and the subsequent interpretation of culture results. However, overnight refrigeration does not affect the determination from smears of sputum suitability for culture based on cellular composition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6699145      PMCID: PMC271008          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.19.2.161-163.1984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  8 in total

1.  Microscopic and baceriologic analysis of expectorated sputum.

Authors:  P R Murray; J A Washington
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Survival of Streptococcus pneumoniae in sputum from patients with pneumonia.

Authors:  S G Williams; C A Kauffman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Microscopic and bacteriological comparison of paired sputa and transtracheal aspirates.

Authors:  R W Geckler; D H Gremillion; C K McAllister; C Ellenbogen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Misinformation from sputum cultures without microscopic examination.

Authors:  H S Heineman; J K Chawla; W M Lopton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Bacterial sputum cultures. A clinician's viewpoint.

Authors:  R E Van Scoy
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Experience with a microscopic screening program for sputum specimens.

Authors:  R K Porschen
Journal:  Health Lab Sci       Date:  1977-01

7.  Ordering patterns, collection, transport, and screening of sputum cultures in a community hospital: evaluation of methods to improve results.

Authors:  J T Jacobson; J P Burke; J A Jacobson
Journal:  Infect Control       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug

8.  Comparison of six different criteria for judging the acceptability of sputum specimens.

Authors:  L K Wong; A L Barry; S M Horgan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 5.948

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Semiquantitation of bacteria in sputum gram stains.

Authors:  P N Valenstein
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparative evaluation of selective media for isolation of Pseudomonas cepacia from cystic fibrosis patients and environmental sources.

Authors:  L A Carson; O C Tablan; L B Cusick; W R Jarvis; M S Favero; L A Bland
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.948

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.