| Literature DB >> 24598940 |
Young-Wook Kim1, Young-Ju Jeong1, Ah-Young Kim2, Hyun-Hee Son1, Jong-Am Lee1, Cheong-Hwan Jung1, Chae-Hyun Kim1, Jaeman Kim3.
Abstract
Five novel Lactobacillus brevis strains were isolated from naturally fermented Aloe vera leaf flesh. Each strain was identified by Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis and 16S rRNA sequence comparison. These strains were highly tolerant to acid, surviving in pH2.5 for up to 4 hours, and resistant to 5% bile salts at 37°C for 18 hours. Due to its tolerance to acid and bile salts, one strain passed through the gastric barrier and colonised the intestine after oral administration. All five strains inhibited the growth of many harmful enteropathogens without restraining most of normal commensals in the gut and hence named POAL (Probiotics Originating from Aloe Leaf) strains. Additionally, each strain exhibited discriminative resistance to a wide range of antibiotics. The L. brevis POAL strains, moreover, expressed high levels of the glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) gene which produces a beneficial neurotransmitter, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA). These characteristics in all suggest that the novel L. brevis strains should be considered as potential food additives and resources for pharmaceutical research.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24598940 PMCID: PMC3944883 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090866
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Screening of LAB from fermented aloe flesh.
| Selection step | Number of colonies selected |
| 1. Acid tolerance (pH 2.5 for 4 h at 37°C) | 113 |
| 2. Bromocresol Purple (Lactic acid positive) | 65 |
| 3. Haemolysis test (non-haemolytic) | 30 |
| 4. RAPD Analysis | 5 strains |
*5 strains were identified by RAPD analysis.
Figure 1Phylogenetic analysis of isolated L. brevis strains by RAPD.
(a) A representative RAPD analysis with primer OPA-08 (b) UPGMA phylogenetic tree of isolated strains.
Figure 2Base changes in the 16S rRNA sequences of L. brevis strains.
Biochemical and physiological characteristics of lactic acid bacteria*.
| POAL 002 | POAL 003 | POAL 005 | POAL 006 | POAL 007 | KCTC 3498 | KCTC 3102 | |
| Glycerol | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Erythritol | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| D-Arabinose | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| L-Arabinose | + | + | + | + | + | + | ? |
| Ribose | + | + | + | + | + | + | ? |
| D-Xylose | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| L-Xylose | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Adonitol | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| β-Methyl-xyloside | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Galactose | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| D-Glucose | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | − |
| D-Fructose | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | + | ? |
| D-Mannose | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| L-Sorbose | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Rhamnose | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Dulicitol | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Inositol | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Mannitol | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Sorbitol | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| α Methyl-D-mannoside | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| α Methyl-D-glucoside | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| N acetyl glucosamine | ? | ? | ? | − | ? | ? | ? |
| Amygdaline | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Arbutine | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Esculin | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Salicine | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Cellobiose | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Maltose | + | + | ? | ? | ? | + | + |
| Lactose | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Melibiose | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Saccharose | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Trehalose | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Inuline | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Melezitose | − | − | − | − | − | −− | − |
| D-Raffinose | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Amidon | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Glycogen | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Xylitol | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| β Gentiobiose | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| D-Turanose | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| D-Lyxose | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| D-Tagatose | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| D-Fucose | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| L-Fucose | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| D-Arabitol | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| L-Arabitol | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Gluconate | ? | ? | − | ? | ? | ? | − |
| 2 ceto-gluconate | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| 5 ceto-gluconate | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | − |
*(−) = negative result, (+) = positive result, (?) = doubtful result, as described in Materials and Methods.
Figure 3Survival of L. brevis POAL strains at pH 2.5 (A) and pH 3.0 (B), respectively.
Figure 4Effect of bile salt concentration on the viability of L. brevis POAL strains.
Survival rates were estimated after 18-hours at 37°C in the indicated bile salt concentration.
Antibiotic susceptibility profiles of the POAL strains*.
| Antibiotics | POAL 002 | POAL 003 | POAL 005 | POAL 006 | POAL 007 | KCTC 3498 | KCTC 3102 |
| Apramycin | I | + | + | S | S | S | + |
| Gentamicin | + | S | I | S | I | S | + |
| Cefotaxime | I | I | + | + | I | I | S |
| Tetracycline | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Amox./Clav Acid† | S | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Chloramphenicol | S | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Neomycin | + | I | I | I | I | I | I |
| Norfloxacin | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Colistin | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Ampicillin | S | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Sulfa-trimetho | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Erythromycin | I | I | I | I | I | S | I |
| Oxyteracycline | + | I | + | + | + | + | + |
| Doxycycline | I | I | + | I | I | I | S |
| Ciprofloxacin | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Streptomycin | + | + | + | I | + | + | + |
*+ = resistant; I = intermediate; S = susceptible †Amox/Clav acid; Amoxicillin/Clavulanic Acid.
Antimicrobial spectrum of the selected L. brevis POAL strains*.
| Indicator strains |
| ||||||
| POAL002 | POAL003 | POAL005 | POAL006 | POAL007 | KCTC3498 | KCTC3102 | |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| ++ | ++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
|
| +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| ++ | ++ | ++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ |
|
| ++ | ++ | ++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ |
|
| + | + | + | ++ | ++ | + | + |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
|
| + | + | + | + | + | ++ | ++ |
|
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
|
| + | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | + |
|
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | ++ |
*Symbols for diameter of inhibition zones: +++ = >30 mm, ++ = >20∼25 mm, + = >15 mm; – = 0.
Viability of L. brevis strains in the mouse intestine after administration for 1 week.
| Strains | POAL 002 | POAL 003 | POAL 005 | POAL 006 | POAL 007 | KCTC3498 | KCTC3102 |
| Identified | − | − | − | + | − | + | − |
| Matched | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% | 0 | 100% | 0 |
Figure 5qRT- PCR analysis of GAD expression.
Total RNA was isolated from L. brevis, converted to cDNA and analysed by qRT-PCR. KCTC3498T and KCTC3102T strains were used as references. Bars represent relative mean intensity. All values are expressed as the means ± SE, and the statistical significance was set at P<0.05.