Literature DB >> 14706748

An improved method of microencapsulation and its evaluation to protect Lactobacillus spp. in simulated gastric conditions.

V Chandramouli1, K Kailasapathy, P Peiris, M Jones.   

Abstract

An improved method of microencapsulation was developed to increase the efficacy of capsules in protecting the encapsulated bacteria under simulated gastric conditions. Lactobacillus acidophilus CSCC 2400 was encapsulated in calcium alginate and tested for its survival in simulated gastric conditions. The effects of different capsule sizes (200, 450, 1000 microm), different sodium alginate concentrations (0.75%, 1%, 1.5%, 1.8% and 2% w/v) and different concentrations of calcium chloride (0.1, 0.2, 1.0 M) on the viability of encapsulated bacteria were investigated. The viability of the cells in the microcapsules increased with an increase in alginate capsule size and gel concentration. There was no significant difference (p>0.05) in the viability of encapsulated cells when the concentration of calcium chloride was increased. Increase in cell load during encapsulation increased the number of bacterial survivors at the end of 3-h incubation in simulated gastric conditions. Hardening the capsule in calcium chloride solution for a longer time (8 h) had no impact on increasing the viability of encapsulated bacteria in a simulated gastric environment. The release of encapsulated cells at different phosphate buffer concentrations was also studied. When encapsulated L. acidophilus CSCC 2400 and L. acidophilus CSCC 2409 were subjected to low pH (pH 2) and high bile concentration (1.0% bile) under optimal encapsulation conditions (1.8% (w/v) alginate, 10(9) CFU/ml, 30 min hardening in 0.1 M CaCl(2) and capsule size 450 microm), there was a significant increase (p<0.05) in viable cell counts, compared to the free cells under similar conditions. Thus the encapsulation method described in this study may be effectively used to protect the lactobacillus from adverse gastric conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14706748     DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2003.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Methods        ISSN: 0167-7012            Impact factor:   2.363


  49 in total

Review 1.  Technology and potential applications of probiotic encapsulation in fermented milk products.

Authors:  Siavash Iravani; Hassan Korbekandi; Seyed Vahid Mirmohammadi
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 2.701

Review 2.  A review of the advancements in probiotic delivery: Conventional vs. non-conventional formulations for intestinal flora supplementation.

Authors:  Mershen Govender; Yahya E Choonara; Pradeep Kumar; Lisa C du Toit; Sandy van Vuuren; Viness Pillay
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.246

3.  Survival of probiotics in pea protein-alginate microcapsules with or without chitosan coating during storage and in a simulated gastrointestinal environment.

Authors:  Natallia Varankovich; Maria F Martinez; Michael T Nickerson; Darren R Korber
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.391

4.  Evaluation of the probiotic potential and effect of encapsulation on survival for Lactobacillus plantarum ST16Pa isolated from papaya.

Authors:  Svetoslav D Todorov; Jean Guy Leblanc; Bernadette D G M Franco
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 5.  Encapsulation of Probiotics: Proper Selection of the Probiotic Strain and the Influence of Encapsulation Technology and Materials on the Viability of Encapsulated Microorganisms.

Authors:  Aušra Šipailienė; Sigita Petraitytė
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.609

6.  Immobilization of fluorescent bacterial bioreporter for arsenic detection.

Authors:  Evrim Elcin; Huseyin Avni Öktem
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2020-01-18

7.  Role of c-di-GMP in improving stress resistance of alginate-chitosan microencapsulated Bacillus subtilis cells in simulated digestive fluids.

Authors:  Chaolei Zhang; Chao Wang; Shan Zhao; Zhilong Xiu
Journal:  Biotechnol Lett       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.461

8.  Possible Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Oysters (Crassostrea gigas).

Authors:  Chang-Ho Kang; Takyong Gu; Jae-Seong So
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.609

9.  Capsulized faecal microbiota transplantation ameliorates post-weaning diarrhoea by modulating the gut microbiota in piglets.

Authors:  Wenjie Tang; Daiwen Chen; Bing Yu; Jun He; Zhiqing Huang; Ping Zheng; Xiangbing Mao; Yuheng Luo; Junqiu Luo; Quyuan Wang; Huifen Wang; Jie Yu
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 3.683

10.  Cell viability of microencapsulated Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis under freeze-drying, storage and gastrointestinal tract simulation conditions.

Authors:  Fatemeh Shamekhi; Mustafa Shuhaimi; Arbakariya Ariff; Yazid A Manap
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 2.099

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.