Literature DB >> 24596850

Is patient choice the future of health care systems?

Marianna Fotaki1.   

Abstract

Patient and user choice are at the forefront of the debate on the future direction of health and public services provision in many industrialized countries in Europe and elsewhere. It is used both, as a means to achieve desired policy goals in public health care systems such as greater efficiency and improved quality of care, and as a good with its own intrinsic value. However, the evidence suggests that its impact on efficiency and quality is at best a very limited while it might have negative consequences on equity because the pre-existing inequalities of income and education could influence patients' access to information and, consequently, choices. The paper attempts to introduce multidisciplinary frameworks to account for the social and cultural factors guiding patients' choices and to explain the rationale, processes and outcomes of decision making in health care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Efficiency; Health Ethics; Market; Patient Choice; Public Good; Quality of Care

Year:  2013        PMID: 24596850      PMCID: PMC3937913          DOI: 10.15171/ijhpm.2013.22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag        ISSN: 2322-5939


  6 in total

1.  Towards developing new partnerships in public services: users as consumers, citizens and/or co-producers in health and social care in England and Sweden.

Authors:  Marianna Fotaki
Journal:  Public Adm       Date:  2011

2.  Continuity through change: the rhetoric and reality of health reform in New Zealand.

Authors:  Toni Ashton; Nicholas Mays; Nancy Devlin
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-04-02       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  An experiment with regulated competition and individual mandates for universal health care: the new Dutch health insurance system.

Authors:  Pauline Vaillancourt Rosenau; Christiaan J Lako
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.265

4.  Trust and trustworthy care in the managed care era.

Authors:  B H Gray
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 5.  What benefits will choice bring to patients? Literature review and assessment of implications.

Authors:  Marianna Fotaki; Martin Roland; Alan Boyd; Ruth McDonald; Rod Scheaff; Liz Smith
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2008-07

6.  Patient reactions to hospital choice in Norway, Denmark, and Sweden.

Authors:  Karsten Vrangbaek; Katarina Østergren; Hans Okkels Birk; Ulrika Winblad
Journal:  Health Econ Policy Law       Date:  2007-04
  6 in total
  11 in total

1.  Why even the logic of re-defined choice may still contradict the logic of care in public health systems?

Authors:  Marianna Fotaki
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2013-09-29

2.  Patient Choice Has Become the Standard Practice in Healthcare Provision: It is Time to Extend its Meaning Comment on "Is Patient Choice the Future of Health Care Systems?".

Authors:  Benjamin Ewert
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2013-09-14

3.  Comparative effectiveness research for the clinician researcher: a framework for making a methodological design choice.

Authors:  Cylie M Williams; Elizabeth H Skinner; Alicia M James; Jill L Cook; Steven M McPhail; Terry P Haines
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Citizens' preferences on healthcare expenditure allocation: evidence from Greece.

Authors:  Sofia Xesfingi; Athanassios Vozikis; Yannis Pollalis
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Hospital choice in Germany from the patient's perspective: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Werner de Cruppé; Max Geraedts
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Do informed consumers in Taiwan favour larger hospitals? A 10-year population-based study on differences in the selection of healthcare providers among medical professionals, their relatives and the general population.

Authors:  Raymond N Kuo; Wanchi Chen; Yuting Lin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  As predicted by theory: choice and competition in a publicly funded and regulated regional health system yield improved access and cost control.

Authors:  Jonas Wohlin; Clara Fischer; Karin Solberg Carlsson; Sara Korlén; Pamela Mazzocato; Carl Savage; Holger Stalberg; Mats Brommels
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Patient preference in psychological treatment and associations with self-reported outcome: national cross-sectional survey in England and Wales.

Authors:  Ryan Williams; Lorna Farquharson; Lucy Palmer; Paul Bassett; Jeremy Clarke; David M Clark; Mike J Crawford
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 3.630

9.  Effect of patient choice and hospital competition on service configuration and technology adoption within cancer surgery: a national, population-based study.

Authors:  Ajay Aggarwal; Daniel Lewis; Malcolm Mason; Arnie Purushotham; Richard Sullivan; Jan van der Meulen
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Can voucher scheme enhance primary care provision for older adults: cross-sectional study in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Johnny T K Cheung; Samuel Y S Wong; Dicken C C Chan; Dexing Zhang; Lawrence H F Luk; Patsy Y K Chau; Benjamin H K Yip; Eric K P Lee; Eliza L Y Wong; E K Yeoh
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.