Literature DB >> 18634659

Patient reactions to hospital choice in Norway, Denmark, and Sweden.

Karsten Vrangbaek1, Katarina Østergren, Hans Okkels Birk, Ulrika Winblad.   

Abstract

This article is a comparative study of three Scandinavian countries--Norway, Denmark, and Sweden--all of which have provided the individual patient with extensive rights to choose the hospital where he/she wishes to receive treatment. In the paper, we present an analysis of the utilization of the opportunity to choose between hospitals in these three countries. The analysis addresses two questions: (i) How many patients are exercising the right to choose between hospitals in these countries and who is making use of this opportunity? (ii) How can we explain the observed utilization pattern? The results of the study reveal clear similarities between the three countries and suggest that few patients have actually chosen their hospital. However, a gradual increase can be observed over the years. Few formal, legislative, or economic barriers exist for patients. Instead, limited knowledge amongst patients regarding reforms, combined with insufficient support from GPs and limited information, can explain why few patients choose to receive care outside of their local region.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18634659     DOI: 10.1017/S174413310700401X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ Policy Law        ISSN: 1744-1331


  17 in total

1.  [In favour of free choice of hospital].

Authors:  Joan Gené Badia; Pedro Gallo de Puelles
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 1.137

2.  Health status after cancer: does it matter which hospital you belong to?

Authors:  Jon H Fiva; Torbjørn Haegeland; Marte Rønning
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Patient hospital choice for hip replacement: empirical evidence from the Netherlands.

Authors:  Puck D C Beukers; Ron G M Kemp; Marco Varkevisser
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2013-10-25

4.  A management dilemma: infectious keratitis associated with soft contact lens use and dubious treatment compliance.

Authors:  Konstantinos T Tsaousis; Georgios Sakkias; Nikolaos Kozeis; Periklis Tahiaos
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2010-08-10

5.  Women's Preferences for Birthing Hospital in Denmark: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Nasrin Tayyari Dehbarez; Morten Raun Mørkbak; Dorte Gyrd-Hansen; Niels Uldbjerg; Rikke Søgaard
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Is patient choice the future of health care systems?

Authors:  Marianna Fotaki
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2013-08-12

7.  Do patients choose community health services (CHS) for first treatment in China? Results from a community health survey in urban areas.

Authors:  Changmin Tang; Zhenni Luo; Pengqian Fang; Fengfan Zhang
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2013-10

8.  Inequity in the use of physician services in Norway before and after introducing patient lists in primary care.

Authors:  Astrid L Grasdal; Karin Monstad
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2011-06-15

9.  Viewing second opinions in terms of recent developments in patient choice.

Authors:  Richard B Saltman
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2012-07-24

10.  Free choice of healthcare providers in the Netherlands is both a goal in itself and a precondition: modelling the policy assumptions underlying the promotion of patient choice through documentary analysis and interviews.

Authors:  Aafke Victoor; Roland D Friele; Diana M J Delnoij; Jany J D J M Rademakers
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.