Literature DB >> 24590467

Why is the sunny side always up? Explaining the spatial mapping of concepts by language use.

Stephanie C Goodhew1, Bethany McGaw, Evan Kidd.   

Abstract

Humans appear to rely on spatial mappings to represent and describe concepts. The conceptual cuing effect describes the tendency for participants to orient attention to a spatial location following the presentation of an unrelated cue word (e.g., orienting attention upward after reading the word sky). To date, such effects have predominately been explained within the embodied cognition framework, according to which people's attention is oriented on the basis of prior experience (e.g., sky → up via perceptual simulation). However, this does not provide a compelling explanation for how abstract words have the same ability to orient attention. Why, for example, does dream also orient attention upward? We report on an experiment that investigated the role of language use (specifically, collocation between concept words and spatial words for up and down dimensions) and found that it predicted the cuing effect. The results suggest that language usage patterns may be instrumental in explaining conceptual cuing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24590467     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0593-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  26 in total

1.  Spatial iconicity affects semantic relatedness judgments.

Authors:  Rolf A Zwaan; Richard H Yaxley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

2.  A metaphor-enriched social cognition.

Authors:  Mark J Landau; Brian P Meier; Lucas A Keefer
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Head up, foot down: object words orient attention to the objects' typical location.

Authors:  Zachary Estes; Michelle Verges; Lawrence W Barsalou
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-02

4.  Thinking of God moves attention.

Authors:  Alison L Chasteen; Donna C Burdzy; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-10-03       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  The linguistic and embodied nature of conceptual processing.

Authors:  Max M Louwerse; Patrick Jeuniaux
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-10-08

6.  Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness.

Authors:  S He; P Cavanagh; J Intriligator
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-09-26       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Visual search asymmetries in three-dimensional space.

Authors:  F H Previc; J L Blume
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Asymmetries in the sensitivity to motion in depth: a centripetal bias.

Authors:  M Edwards; D R Badcock
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Stored word sequences in language learning: the effect of familiarity on children's repetition of four-word combinations.

Authors:  Colin Bannard; Danielle Matthews
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-03

10.  Reading "sun" and looking up: the influence of language on saccadic eye movements in the vertical dimension.

Authors:  Carolin Dudschig; Jan Souman; Martin Lachmair; Irmgard de la Vega; Barbara Kaup
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  A test of the symbol interdependency hypothesis with both concrete and abstract stimuli.

Authors:  Simritpal Kaur Malhi; Lori Buchanan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.