Literature DB >> 18271853

Head up, foot down: object words orient attention to the objects' typical location.

Zachary Estes1, Michelle Verges, Lawrence W Barsalou.   

Abstract

Many objects typically occur in particular locations, and object words encode these spatial associations. We tested whether such object words (e.g., head, foot) orient attention toward the location where the denoted object typically occurs (i.e., up, down). Because object words elicit perceptual simulations of the denoted objects (i.e., the representations acquired during actual perception are reactivated), we predicted that an object word would interfere with identification of an unrelated visual target subsequently presented in the object's typical location. Consistent with this prediction, three experiments demonstrated that words denoting objects that typically occur high in the visual field hindered identification of targets appearing at the top of the display, whereas words denoting low objects hindered target identification at the bottom of the display. Thus, object words oriented attention to and activated perceptual simulations in the objects' typical locations. These results shed new light on how language affects perception.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18271853     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02051.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  36 in total

1.  Body part representations in verbal semantics.

Authors:  Benjamin Bergen; Ting-Ting Chan Lau; Shweta Narayan; Diana Stojanovic; Kathryn Wheeler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

2.  Using prediction markets to estimate the reproducibility of scientific research.

Authors:  Anna Dreber; Thomas Pfeiffer; Johan Almenberg; Siri Isaksson; Brad Wilson; Yiling Chen; Brian A Nosek; Magnus Johannesson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Simple actions activate semantic associations.

Authors:  Blaire J Weidler; Richard A Abrams
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

4.  Root versus roof: automatic activation of location information during word processing.

Authors:  Martin Lachmair; Carolin Dudschig; Monica De Filippis; Irmgard de la Vega; Barbara Kaup
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-12

5.  Biasing spatial attention with semantic information: an event coding approach.

Authors:  Tarek Amer; Davood G Gozli; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-04-21

6.  When up-words meet down-sentences: evidence for word- or sentence-based compatibility effects?

Authors:  Barbara Kaup; Monica De Filippis; Martin Lachmair; Irmgard de la Vega; Carolin Dudschig
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-08

7.  Neural mechanisms of shifts of spatial attention induced by object words with spatial associations: an ERP study.

Authors:  Entao Zhang; Junlong Luo; Jijia Zhang; Yan Wang; Jun Zhong; Qiwei Li
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Perceptual Experience Norms for 506 Russian Nouns: Modality Rating, Spatial Localization, Manipulability, Imageability and Other Variables.

Authors:  Alex Miklashevsky
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2018-06

9.  Implied Spatial Meaning and Visuospatial Bias: Conceptual Processing Influences Processing of Visual Targets and Distractors.

Authors:  Davood G Gozli; Jay Pratt; K Zoë Martin; Alison L Chasteen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  The role of partial knowledge in statistical word learning.

Authors:  Daniel Yurovsky; Damian C Fricker; Chen Yu; Linda B Smith
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.