Literature DB >> 2458879

Trimethoprim alters the disposition of procainamide and N-acetylprocainamide.

T Kosoglou1, M L Rocci, P H Vlasses.   

Abstract

The steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of procainamide and its active N-acetyl metabolite (NAPA) were assessed alone and in combination with trimethoprim. Eight healthy men received oral sustained-release procainamide, 500 mg every 6 hours for 3 days, alone and with oral trimethoprim, 200 mg daily for 4 days. Concomitant trimethoprim significantly increased the plasma AUC(0-12) of both procainamide and NAPA (63% and 52%, respectively), with concurrent decreases in their renal clearances (47% and 13%, respectively) and a 39% increase in the mean urinary recovery of NAPA (as percentage of procainamide and NAPA recovery). After trimethoprim coadministration, there was also a trend toward a decrease in the apparent acetylation clearance of procainamide (19%, p = 0.057). The change in procainamide and NAPA renal clearances after trimethoprim coadministration strongly correlated with their baseline renal clearances (r = 0.84 and r = 0.74, respectively, p less than 0.0001). There was small but significant increase in the corrected QT interval with procainamide administration, which increased further with trimethoprim coadministration. We conclude that trimethoprim increases the plasma concentrations of procainamide and NAPA by decreasing their renal clearances and allowing more conversion of procainamide to NAPA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2458879     DOI: 10.1038/clpt.1988.181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  12 in total

1.  Molecular mechanism of renal tubular secretion of the antimalarial drug chloroquine.

Authors:  Fabian Müller; Jörg König; Hartmut Glaeser; Ingrid Schmidt; Oliver Zolk; Martin F Fromm; Renke Maas
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Measurement of renal function during drug development.

Authors:  D Craig Brater
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Considerations when prescribing trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

Authors:  Joanne M-W Ho; David N Juurlink
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Adverse effects of class I antiarrhythmic drugs.

Authors:  J Caron; C Libersa
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Zidovudine, trimethoprim, and dapsone pharmacokinetic interactions in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection.

Authors:  B L Lee; S Safrin; V Makrides; J G Gambertoglio
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Renal Drug Transporters and Drug Interactions.

Authors:  Anton Ivanyuk; Françoise Livio; Jérôme Biollaz; Thierry Buclin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin decrease procainamide and N-acetylprocainamide renal clearances.

Authors:  Larry A Bauer; Douglas J Black; Jennifer S Lill; Julie Garrison; Vidmantas A Raisys; Thomas M Hooton
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Antiarrhythmic agents: drug interactions of clinical significance.

Authors:  T C Trujillo; P E Nolan
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 9.  Acecainide (N-acetylprocainamide). A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in cardiac arrhythmias.

Authors:  D W Harron; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 10.  Poisoning due to class IA antiarrhythmic drugs. Quinidine, procainamide and disopyramide.

Authors:  S Y Kim; N L Benowitz
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.