Literature DB >> 11144659

Antiarrhythmic agents: drug interactions of clinical significance.

T C Trujillo1, P E Nolan.   

Abstract

The management of cardiac arrhythmias has grown more complex in recent years. Despite the recent focus on nonpharmacological therapy, most clinical arrhythmias are treated with existing antiarrhythmics. Because of the narrow therapeutic index of antiarrhythmic agents, potential drug interactions with other medications are of major clinical importance. As most antiarrhythmics are metabolised via the cytochrome P450 enzyme system, pharmacokinetic interactions constitute the majority of clinically significant interactions seen with these agents. Antiarrhythmics may be substrates, inducers or inhibitors of cytochrome P450 enzymes, and many of these metabolic interactions have been characterised. However, many potential interactions have not, and knowledge of how antiarrhythmic agents are metabolised by the cytochrome P450 enzyme system may allow clinicians to predict potential interactions. Drug interactions with Vaughn-Williams Class II (beta-blockers) and Class IV (calcium antagonists) agents have previously been reviewed and are not discussed here. Class I agents, which primarily block fast sodium channels and slow conduction velocity, include quinidine, procainamide, disopyramide, lidocaine (lignocaine), mexiletine, flecainide and propafenone. All of these agents except procainamide are metabolised via the cytochrome P450 system and are involved in a number of drug-drug interactions, including over 20 different interactions with quinidine. Quinidine has been observed to inhibit the metabolism of digoxin, tricyclic antidepressants and codeine. Furthermore, cimetidine, azole antifungals and calcium antagonists can significantly inhibit the metabolism of quinidine. Procainamide is excreted via active tubular secretion, which may be inhibited by cimetidine and trimethoprim. Other Class I agents may affect the disposition of warfarin, theophylline and tricyclic antidepressants. Many of these interactions can significantly affect efficacy and/or toxicity. Of the Class III antiarrhythmics, amiodarone is involved in a significant number of interactions since it is a potent inhibitor of several cytochrome P450 enzymes. It can significantly impair the metabolism of digoxin, theophylline and warfarin. Dosages of digoxin and warfarin should empirically be decreased by one-half when amiodarone therapy is added. In addition to pharmacokinetic interactions, many reports describe the use of antiarrhythmic drug combinations for the treatment of arrhythmias. By combining antiarrhythmic drugs and utilising additive electrophysiological/pharmacodynamic effects, antiarrhythmic efficacy may be improved and toxicity reduced. As medication regimens grow more complex with the aging population, knowledge of existing and potential drug-drug interactions becomes vital for clinicians to optimise drug therapy for every patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11144659     DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200023060-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  223 in total

1.  Effect of fluvoxamine on the pharmacokinetics of quinidine.

Authors:  P Damkier; L L Hansen; K Brøsen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Caffeine and theophylline attenuate adenosine-induced vasodilation in humans.

Authors:  P Smits; J W Lenders; T Thien
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Role of combination drug therapy with a class IC antiarrhythmic agent and mexiletine for ventricular tachycardia.

Authors:  L Mendes; P J Podrid; T Fuchs; S Franklin
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Inhibition of theophylline metabolism by mexiletine in young male and female nonsmokers.

Authors:  C M Loi; X X Wei; R E Vestal
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  The noninterference of aluminum hydroxide gel with quinidine sulfate absorption: an approach to control quinidine-induced diarrhea.

Authors:  J A Romankiewicz; M Reidenberg; D Drayer; J E Franklin
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Pharmacokinetic and electrophysiologic interactions of amiodarone and procainamide.

Authors:  J Windle; E N Prystowsky; W M Miles; J J Heger
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Efficacy of combination therapy with mexiletine and a type IA agent for inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias secondary to coronary artery disease.

Authors:  A M Greenspan; S R Spielman; C R Webb; N M Sokoloff; A P Rae; L N Horowitz
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1985-08-01       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 8.  Quinidine and digoxin. An important interaction.

Authors:  J T Bigger; E B Leahey
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Quinidine pharmacokinetics in patients with cirrhosis or receiving propranolol.

Authors:  K M Kessler; W C Humphries; M Black; J F Spann
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Quinidine-enhanced beta-blockade during treatment with propafenone in extensive metabolizer human subjects.

Authors:  K E Mörike; D M Roden
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 6.875

View more
  23 in total

1.  Lansoprazole precipitated QT prolongation and torsade de pointes associated with disopyramide.

Authors:  Hiroshi Asajima; Naotaka Saito; Yoshinori Ohmura; Kazue Ohmura
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  TASK Channel Deletion Reduces Sensitivity to Local Anesthetic-induced Seizures.

Authors:  Guizhi Du; Xiangdong Chen; Marko S Todorovic; Shaofang Shu; Jaideep Kapur; Douglas A Bayliss
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  P450-Based Drug-Drug Interactions of Amiodarone and its Metabolites: Diversity of Inhibitory Mechanisms.

Authors:  Matthew G McDonald; Nicholas T Au; Allan E Rettie
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.922

Review 4.  Safety of flecainide.

Authors:  Juan Tamargo; Alessandro Capucci; Philippe Mabo
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Stress-induced lidocaine modification in serum and tissues.

Authors:  T Saranteas; C Tesseromatis; A Potamianou; C Mourouzis; D Varonos
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.441

Review 6.  Safety and Interactions of Direct Oral Anticoagulants with Antiarrhythmic Drugs.

Authors:  Ipek Celikyurt; Christoph R Meier; Michael Kühne; Beat Schaer
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Local anesthetic inhibits hyperpolarization-activated cationic currents.

Authors:  Qing-Tao Meng; Zhong-Yuan Xia; Jin Liu; Douglas A Bayliss; Xiangdong Chen
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 8.  Treatment of anxiety and depression in transplant patients: pharmacokinetic considerations.

Authors:  Catherine C Crone; Geoffrey M Gabriel
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 9.  [Amiodaron for treatment of perioperative cardiac arrythmia: a broad spectrum antiarrythmetic agent?].

Authors:  N Butte; B W Böttiger; P Teschendorf
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.041

10.  Safety and Effectiveness of Rivaroxaban in Combination with Various Antiarrhythmic Drugs in Patients with Non-Permanent Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Wei-Ru Chiou; Chun-Che Huang; Po-Lin Lin; Jen-Yu Chuang; Lawrence Yu-Min Liu; Min-I Su; Feng-Ching Liao; Chun-Yen Chen; Jen-Yuan Kuo; Cheng-Ting Tsai; Yih-Jer Wu; Ying-Hsiang Lee
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.