Literature DB >> 24587699

Current status of quality measurement in colon and rectal surgery.

Formosa Chen1, Sepideh Shivarani1, James Yoo2.   

Abstract

There is increasing pressure from the public and insurance payors for transparency and accountability in ensuring the quality of health care. In response to this, hospitals are now mandated to participate in quality improvement initiatives, and to report on their performance. This article describes three programs related to the measurement of quality that impact colon and rectal surgery: the Surgical Care Improvement Project, the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, and the Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NSQIP; SCIP; SCOAP

Year:  2014        PMID: 24587699      PMCID: PMC3926919          DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1366913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg        ISSN: 1530-9681


  18 in total

1.  Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.

Authors:  A J Mangram; T C Horan; M L Pearson; L C Silver; W R Jarvis
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.254

2.  Risk adjustment of the postoperative morbidity rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study.

Authors:  J Daley; S F Khuri; W Henderson; K Hur; J O Gibbs; G Barbour; J Demakis; G Irvin; J F Stremple; F Grover; G McDonald; E Passaro; P J Fabri; J Spencer; K Hammermeister; J B Aust; C Oprian
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Washington State's approach to variability in surgical processes/Outcomes: Surgical Clinical Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP).

Authors:  David R Flum; Nancy Fisher; Jeffery Thompson; Miriam Marcus-Smith; Michael Florence; Carlos A Pellegrini
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 4.  Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project.

Authors:  Dale W Bratzler; Peter M Houck
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Hospitals collaborate to decrease surgical site infections.

Authors:  E Patchen Dellinger; Susan M Hausmann; Dale W Bratzler; Rosa M Johnson; Donna M Daniel; Kathryn M Bunt; Greg A Baumgardner; Jonathan R Sugarman
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Report card on Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP): nationwide inpatient sample infection data 2001-2006.

Authors:  John Mihran Davis; Yen-Hong Kuo; Nasim Ahmed; Yen-Liang Kuo
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 2.150

7.  Using the Veterans Administration National Surgical Quality Improvement Program to improve patient outcomes.

Authors:  L Neumayer; M Mastin; L Vanderhoof; D Hinson
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  Use of antimicrobial prophylaxis for major surgery: baseline results from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project.

Authors:  Dale W Bratzler; Peter M Houck; Chesley Richards; Lynn Steele; E Patchen Dellinger; Donald E Fry; Claudia Wright; Allen Ma; Karina Carr; Lisa Red
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2005-02

9.  Improving surgical site infections: using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data to institute Surgical Care Improvement Project protocols in improving surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Christina M Berenguer; M Gage Ochsner; S Alan Lord; Christopher K Senkowski
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  An increase in compliance with the Surgical Care Improvement Project measures does not prevent surgical site infection in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Carlos Pastor; Avo Artinyan; Madhulika G Varma; Edward Kim; Laurel Gibbs; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.585

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.