Literature DB >> 10644468

Using the Veterans Administration National Surgical Quality Improvement Program to improve patient outcomes.

L Neumayer1, M Mastin, L Vanderhoof, D Hinson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The primary goal of collecting quality assurance data is to ultimately improve patient care. The VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) provides each station with risk-adjusted morbidity and mortality data on a regular basis. This report of one medical center's use of the risk-adjusted data shows how it can be used to improve patient care.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Risk-adjusted surgical outcome data for Fiscal Year 1996 (FY96) was received from the NSQIP coordinating center. The Salt Lake City VA medical center was identified as a high outlier for morbidity in general surgery. Patient charts were reviewed and data analyzed to determine practice patterns and to determine if there were any provider issues. Data analysis revealed a large number of wound complications and uncovered a practice pattern of closure of contaminated wounds. Using these data and data from the literature, wound infection and disruption prevention protocols were instituted in the fall of 1997. Wound complications from January to December 1996 (preprotocol) and January to December 1998 (postprotocol) were compared using Student's t test.
RESULTS: The total number of operations in 1998 was 719 compared with 634 in 1996. Superficial wound infections dropped from 3.6 to 1.7%, while overall wound complications dropped from 5.5 to 2.9%. None of these changes were statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Although introduction of wound infection and disruption prevention protocols did not result in a statistically significant decrease in wound complication, it did result in a clinically significant improvement in patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10644468     DOI: 10.1006/jsre.1999.5791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  12 in total

1.  Strategies for promoting organizational and practice change by advancing implementation research.

Authors:  Lisa V Rubenstein; Jacqueline Pugh
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Association of hospital participation in a quality reporting program with surgical outcomes and expenditures for Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Nicholas H Osborne; Lauren H Nicholas; Andrew M Ryan; Jyothi R Thumma; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Factors influencing antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical site infection prevention in general surgery: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Anna R Gagliardi; Darlene Fenech; Cagla Eskicioglu; Avery B Nathens; Robin McLeod
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 4.  Improving patient safety through the systematic evaluation of patient outcomes.

Authors:  Alan J Forster; Geoff Dervin; Claude Martin; Steven Papp
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 5.  Current status of quality measurement in colon and rectal surgery.

Authors:  Formosa Chen; Sepideh Shivarani; James Yoo
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-03

6.  Factors Associated with Hospital Admission after Outpatient Surgery in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Hillary J Mull; Amy K Rosen; William J O'Brien; Nathalie McIntosh; Aaron Legler; Mary T Hawn; Kamal M F Itani; Steven D Pizer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Determinants of long-term survival after major surgery and the adverse effect of postoperative complications.

Authors:  Shukri F Khuri; William G Henderson; Ralph G DePalma; Cecilia Mosca; Nancy A Healey; Dharam J Kumbhani
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Comparison of surgical outcomes between teaching and nonteaching hospitals in the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Authors:  S F Khuri; S F Najjar; J Daley; B Krasnicka; M Hossain; W G Henderson; J B Aust; B Bass; M J Bishop; J Demakis; R DePalma; P J Fabri; A Fink; J Gibbs; F Grover; K Hammermeister; G McDonald; L Neumayer; R H Roswell; J Spencer; R H Turnage
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  The quality of cholecystectomy in Denmark has improved over 6-year period.

Authors:  Josephine Philip Rothman; Jakob Burcharth; Hans-Christian Pommergaard; Linda Bardram; Mads Svane Liljekvist; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Development and testing of tools to detect ambulatory surgical adverse events.

Authors:  Hillary J Mull; Ann M Borzecki; Kathleen Hickson; Kamal M F Itani; Amy K Rosen
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.844

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.