Literature DB >> 20421041

Improving surgical site infections: using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data to institute Surgical Care Improvement Project protocols in improving surgical outcomes.

Christina M Berenguer1, M Gage Ochsner, S Alan Lord, Christopher K Senkowski.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) began with the Veterans Affairs system to reduce morbidity and mortality by evaluating preoperative risk factors, postoperative occurrences, mortality reports, surgical site infections, and patient variable statistics. Our institution enrolled in NSQIP July 2006. The Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) was developed to reduce surgical complications, including surgical infections. We began instituting SCIP protocols in July 2007. STUDY
DESIGN: This is a retrospective review of the NSQIP data collected by our NSQIP nurse. The colorectal surgical site infection (SSI) data pre- and post-institution of SCIP guidelines are analyzed. Data from the July 2006 to June 2007 and July 2007 to June 2008 reports are compared. Rates of SCIP compliance are analyzed.
RESULTS: There were 113 colorectal cases in the July 2006 to June 2007 NSQIP report. The rate of superficial SSI was 13.3%, with an expected rate of 9.7% (p = 0.041). The observed-to-expected ratio was 1.39. Compliance with SCIP was 38%. There were 84 colorectal cases in the July 2007 to June 2008 NSQIP report. The rate of superficial SSI was 8.3%, with an expected rate of 10.25% (p = 0.351). The observed-to-expected ratio was 0.81. Compliance with SCIP measures was 92%.
CONCLUSIONS: Participation in NSQIP can identify areas of increased morbidity and mortality. Our institution was a high outlier in superficial SSI in colorectal patients during the first NSQIP evaluations. SCIP guidelines were instituted and a statistically significant reduction in our rates of SSI was realized. As our compliance with SCIP improved, our rates of superficial SSI decreased. Reduction in superficial SSI decreases cost to the patient and decreases length of stay. Copyright 2010 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20421041     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.01.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  35 in total

1.  Use of guideline-based antibiotic prophylaxis in women undergoing gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Khalid Hassan; Cande V Ananth; Thomas J Herzog; Sharyn N Lewin; William M Burke; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 2.  Clinical practice guidelines to inform evidence-based clinical practice.

Authors:  J Stuart Wolf; Heddy Hubbard; Martha M Faraday; John B Forrest
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  The surgical care improvement project and prevention of post-operative infection, including surgical site infection.

Authors:  Laura H Rosenberger; Amani D Politano; Robert G Sawyer
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 2.150

Review 4.  Surgical research using national databases.

Authors:  Ram K Alluri; Hyuma Leland; Nathanael Heckmann
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-10

5.  Effectiveness of a care bundle to reduce surgical site infections in patients having open colorectal surgery.

Authors:  J Tanner; M Kiernan; R Hilliam; S Davey; E Collins; T Wood; J Ball; D Leaper
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  A clinician performance initiative to improve quality of care for patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Susan L Greenspan; John P Bilezikian; Nelson B Watts; Carolyn A Berry; William A Mencia; Stephanie A Stowell; Rachel Bongiorno Karcher
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 7.  Current status of quality measurement in colon and rectal surgery.

Authors:  Formosa Chen; Sepideh Shivarani; James Yoo
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-03

Review 8.  Surgical site infection: poor compliance with guidelines and care bundles.

Authors:  David J Leaper; Judith Tanner; Martin Kiernan; Ojan Assadian; Charles E Edmiston
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update.

Authors:  Deverick J Anderson; Kelly Podgorny; Sandra I Berríos-Torres; Dale W Bratzler; E Patchen Dellinger; Linda Greene; Ann-Christine Nyquist; Lisa Saiman; Deborah S Yokoe; Lisa L Maragakis; Keith S Kaye
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 10.  Bundles Prevent Surgical Site Infections After Colorectal Surgery: Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Aleksander Zywot; Christine S M Lau; H Stephen Fletcher; Subroto Paul
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.