Literature DB >> 2203705

Ernest Amory Codman, M.D., and end results of medical care.

D Neuhauser1.   

Abstract

Ernest Amory Codman, M.D., was one of the most important figures in the history of outcomes research in medicine. While his contemporaries scorned his efforts to create systematic procedures to evaluate the end results of medical care, his work foreshadowed many of today's most pressing issues in technology assessment. This article traces Codman's career as an innovator and political gadfly at the Massachusetts General Hospital during the first three decades of this century, and examines the development and demise of his end-result system.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2203705     DOI: 10.1017/s0266462300000842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  14 in total

1.  Health care quality improvement across the Baylor Health Care System: the first century.

Authors:  David J Ballard; Barbara Spreadbury; Robert S Hopkins
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2004-07

2.  Crossing the quality chasm: lessons from health care quality improvement efforts in England.

Authors:  Rajan Madhok
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2002-01

Review 3.  Issues in the design of training for quality and safety.

Authors:  K Henriksen; E Dayton
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-12

4.  Comment: evaluating the effectiveness of hospital care.

Authors:  H Krakauer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  History and background of quality measurement.

Authors:  Jonathan Chun; Andrea Chao Bafford
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-03

6.  Breaking gridlock in health policy?; Comment on "A new synthesis".

Authors:  Owen Adams
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2014-03-19

Review 7.  Quality Improvement in Athletic Health Care.

Authors:  Andrea D Lopes Sauers; Eric L Sauers; Alison R Snyder Valier
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Technology assessment and biomedical engineering education.

Authors:  D Menon
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Vetting new technologies.

Authors:  T A Sheldon; A Faulkner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-08-31

10.  Looking to Improve Your Practice? Consider the Science of Quality Improvement to Get Started.

Authors:  Alison R Snyder Valier
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.