| Literature DB >> 24587469 |
Stefanie K Menzies1, Alejandro Rodriguez2, Martha Chico2, Carlos Sandoval2, Nely Broncano2, Irene Guadalupe2, Philip J Cooper3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Soil-transmitted helminths (STH) infect more than 2 billion humans worldwide, causing significant morbidity in children. There are few data on the epidemiology and risk factors for infection in pre-school children. To investigate risk factors for infection in early childhood, we analysed data prospectively collected in the ECUAVIDA birth cohort in Ecuador. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24587469 PMCID: PMC3937274 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002718
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Figure 1Flow diagram to show follow up of cohort to 3 years of age.
The children included in the present analysis were those for whom a stool sample was collected at 3 years of age.
Figure 2Prevalence of STH infections in children, parents, and other household members.
Prevalence of STH infections in children is shown at regular age intervals during the first 3 years of life. The maternal stool sample was collected during the 3rd trimester of pregnancy and from other household members soon after the child's birth.
Figure 3Cohort age-distributions of infection intensity categories with A. lumbricoides and T. trichiura.
Infection intensities were estimated using the Kato-Katz method in eggs per gramme of stool and intensity groups were categorized using WHO guidelines [11]: A. lumbricoides (light- <5,000 epg; moderate = 5,000–49,999; heavy – ≥50,000); T. trichiura (light - <1,000 epg; moderate – 1,000–9,999; heavy – ≥10,000).
Characteristics of 1,697 study participants stratified by the presence or absence of any soil-transmitted helminth (STH) infection during the first 3 years of life.
| Characteristic | Uninfected (n = 979) (N, %) | Infected (n = 718) (N, %) | P value | ||
| Child Factors | |||||
| Sex | |||||
| Male | 497 | 50.8% | 357 | 49.7% | 0.671 |
| Gestational age (weeks) [Mean/SD] | 39 | 2 | 39 | 2 | 0.791 |
| Birth order | |||||
| 1–2 | 517 | 52.8% | 306 | 42.6% | |
| 3–4 | 311 | 31.8% | 235 | 32.7% | |
| >5 | 151 | 15.4% | 177 | 24.7% | <0.001 |
| Maternal Factors | |||||
| Age [Mean/SD] | 26 | 6 | 25 | 6 | 0.048 |
| Ethnicity | |||||
| Afro-Ecuadorian | 187 | 19.1% | 259 | 36.1% | <0.001 |
| Other | 792 | 80.9% | 459 | 63.9% | |
| Educational level | |||||
| Illiterate | 103 | 10.5% | 155 | 21.6% | |
| Complete primary | 562 | 57.4% | 448 | 62.4% | |
| Complete secondary | 314 | 32.1% | 115 | 16.0% | <0.001 |
| Paternal Factors | |||||
| Age [Mean/SD] | 30 | 8 | 30 | 9 | 0.516 |
| Ethnicity | |||||
| Afro-Ecuadorian | 175 | 18.3% | 204 | 29.4% | <0.001 |
| Other | 779 | 81.6% | 491 | 70.6% | |
| Educational level | |||||
| Illiterate | 114 | 12.4% | 133 | 20.9% | |
| Complete primary | 486 | 52.8% | 354 | 55.7% | |
| Complete secondary | 321 | 34.9% | 149 | 23.4% | <0.001 |
| Socioeconomic status | |||||
| Low | 328 | 33.5% | 312 | 43.5% | |
| Medium | 303 | 30.9% | 230 | 32% | |
| High | 348 | 35.5% | 176 | 24.5% | <0.001 |
| Environmental Factors | |||||
| Area of residence | |||||
| Urban | 652 | 66.6% | 528 | 73.5% | 0.002 |
| Household overcrowding | |||||
| ≥3 people | 511 | 65.0% | 490 | 80.7% | <0.001 |
| Maternal STH Infections | |||||
| Any STH infection | |||||
| Yes | 346 | 35.5% | 425 | 59.5% | <0.001 |
|
| |||||
| Yes | 184 | 18.9% | 273 | 38.2% | <0.001 |
|
| |||||
| Negative | 790 | 81.1% | 441 | 61.7% | |
| Light | 174 | 17.9% | 200 | 28.0% | |
| Moderate | 10 | 1.0% | 67 | 9.4 | |
| Heavy | 0 | 0% | 6 | 0.8% | <0.001 |
|
| |||||
| Yes | 197 | 20.2% | 279 | 39.1% | <0.001 |
|
| |||||
| Negative | 777 | 79.8% | 438 | 61.2% | |
| Light | 180 | 18.5% | 224 | 31.4% | |
| Moderate | 17 | 1.7% | 47 | 6.6% | |
| Heavy | 0 | 0% | 6 | 0.8% | <0.001 |
| Hookworm | |||||
| Yes | 41 | 4.2% | 63 | 8.8% | <0.001 |
| Paternal STH infection | |||||
| Yes | 82 | 23.9% | 104 | 40.9% | <0.001 |
| Other household member with STH | |||||
| Yes | 408 | 41.7% | 428 | 59.6% | <0.001 |
| Number of stool samples from child | |||||
| 1–4 | 442 | 45.1% | 288 | 40.1% | |
| ≥5 | 537 | 54.9% | 430 | 59.9% | 0.022 |
| Number of anthelmintic treatments | |||||
| Received by child | |||||
| 0 | 250 | 25.5% | 164 | 22.8% | |
| 1 | 451 | 46.1% | 323 | 45% | |
| ≥2 | 278 | 28.4% | 231 | 32.2% | 0.191 |
P values were calculated using Chi-squared or Student's t tests, as appropriate. Ethnicity ‘other’ represents: mothers; 1,245 Mestizo/6 Indigenous; fathers 1264 Mestizo/6 Indigenous. Socioeconomic status represents tertiles of z scores obtained using a factor analysis. Overcrowding is defined as the number of people living in the household per sleeping room. STH infections were detected using direct saline, Kato-Katz and formol-ether concentration methods. SD – standard deviation. Infection intensities were estimated using the Kato-Katz method. STH infection intensity categories were: A. lumbricoides (light- <5,000 eggs per gramme of stool [epg];; moderate = 5,000–49,999; heavy – ≥50,000); T. trichiura (light - <1,000 epg; moderate – 1,000–9,999; heavy – ≥10,000).
*Treatments with any of: albendazole, mebendazole, oxantel/pyrantel, piperazine, nitazoxanide, and flubendazole. Numbers of missing values (brackets) were: gestational age (312), maternal ethnicity (6), paternal ethnicity (54), paternal educational level (140), household overcrowding (304), maternal STH infection (9), and paternal STH infection (1100).
Univariate and multivariable associations between risk factors and having any STH infection during the first 3 years of life.
| Variable | Univariate | Multivariable | ||
| OR (95% CI) | P value | OR (95% CI) | P value | |
| Child Factors | ||||
| Sex: Male vs. Female | 0.96 (0.79–1.16) | 0.671 | ||
| Gestational age: <39 vs. ≥39 weeks | 0.95 (0.76–1.19) | 0.639 | ||
| Birth Order: ≥5th vs. <5thh | 1.79 (1.41–2.29) | <0.001 | 1.85 (1.31–2.60) | 0.001 |
| Maternal Factors | ||||
| Age: <26 vs. ≥26 years | 1.19 (0.98–1.44) | 0.082 | 1.52 (1.15–2.01) | 0.003 |
| Ethnicity: Afro vs. Other | 2.38 (1.91–2.97) | <0.001 | 2.11 (1.61–2.75) | <0.001 |
| Educational level | ||||
| Primary vs. Illiterate | 0.53 (0.40–0.70) | <0.001 | ||
| Secondary vs. Illiterate | 0.24 (0.18–0.34) | <0.001 | ||
| Paternal Factors | ||||
| Age: <30 vs. ≥30 years | 0.88 (0.73–1.07) | 0.197 | ||
| Ethnicity: Afro vs. Other | 1.84 (1.46–2.31) | <0.002 | ||
| Educational level | ||||
| Primary vs. Illiterate | 0.62 (0.47–0.83) | 0.001 | ||
| Secondary vs. Illiterate | 0.40 (0.29–0.55) | <0.001 | ||
| Socioeconomic status | ||||
| Medium vs. Low | 0.80 (0.63–1.01) | 0.056 | 0.79 (0.60–1.06) | 0.118 |
| High vs. Low | 0.53 (0.42–0.68) | <0.001 | 0.54 (0.40–0.74) | <0.001 |
| Environmental Factors | ||||
| Area of residence: Urban vs. Rural | 1.39 (1.13–1.72) | 0.002 |
| <0.001 |
| Household overcrowding: ≥3 vs. <3 | 2.25 (1.76–2.89) | <0.001 |
| <0.001 |
| Maternal STH Infections | ||||
| Any geohelminth: Yes vs. No | 2.67 (2.19–3.26) | <0.001 | ||
|
| 2.66 (2.13–3.31) | <0.001 | ||
|
| ||||
| Light vs. Negative | 2.07 (1.63–2.62) | <0.001 | 1.50 (1.13–1.99) | 0.005 |
| Moderate/heavy vs. Negative | 13.1 (6.7–25.6) | <0.001 |
|
|
|
| 2.53 (2.04–3.14) | <0.001 | ||
|
| ||||
| Light vs. Negative | 2.21 (1.76–2.77) | <0.001 | ||
| Moderate/heavy vs. Negative | 5.53 (3.16–9.67) | <0.001 | ||
| Hookworm: Yes vs. No | 2.20 (1.47–3.30) | <0.001 | ||
| Paternal STH infection: Yes vs. No | 1.83 (1.35–2.49) | <0.001 | ||
| Household member with STH infection: Yes vs. No | 2.07 (1.70–2.51) | <0.001 |
|
|
| Number of stool samples from child | ||||
| ≥5 vs. 1–4 | 1.23 (91.01–1.49) | 0.039 |
|
|
| Number of anthelmintic treatments | ||||
| 1 vs. 0 | 1.09 (0.86–1.39) | 0.48 | ||
| ≥2 vs. 0 | 1.27 (0.97–1.65) | 0.078 | ||
Multivariable analyses included data from 1,381 children for whom complete data were available. Paternal STH infection was excluded from the multivariate model because of missing data. Odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using logistic regression. STH were detected using all 3 microscopic detection methods. Overcrowding was defined as number of household members per sleeping room. SES (socioeconomic) index shows tertiles of Z scores calculated using principal components analysis. Paternal and maternal age, overcrowding, and gestational age used the mean as cut-off. STH infection intensity categories were: A. lumbricoides (light- <5,000 eggs per gramme of stool [epg]; moderate = 5,000–49,999; heavy – ≥50,000); T. trichiura (light - <1,000 epg; moderate – 1,000–9,999; heavy – ≥10,000).
Univariate and multivariable polytomous logistic regressions for factors associated with age of first infection with any STH parasite.
| Variable | Univariate | Multivariable | ||||
| First year* | Second year | Third year | First year | Second year | Third year | |
| OR (95% CI) P value | OR (95% CI) P value | OR (95% CI) P value | OR (95% CI) P value | OR (95% CI) P value | OR (95% CI) P value | |
| Birth Order ≥5 vs. <5 | 3.0 (2.13–4.20) <0.001 | 1.59 (1.15–2.19) 0.005 | 1.29 (0.88–1.90) 0.196 | 2.04(1.36–3.07) 0.001 | 1.24(0.85–1.80) 0.261 | 0.87(0.55–1.36) 0.537 |
| Maternal Ethnicity Afro-Ecuadorian vs. Other | 2.31 (1.66–3.21) <0.001 | 2.14 (1.61–2.83) <0.001 | 2.06 (1.49–2.86) <0.001 | 1.82(1.25–2.65) 0.002 | 1.92(1.40–2.63) <0.001 | 1.92(1.34–2.75) <0.001 |
| Maternal Educational Level ≥Primary vs. Illiterate | 0.31(0.214–0.449) <0.001 | 0.53 (0.37–0.75) <0.001 | 0.50 (0.34–0.74) 0.001 | 0.52(0.33–0.81) 0.004 | 0.73(0.48–1.11) 0.138 | 0.60(0.38–0.96) 0.031 |
| Paternal Ethnicity Afro-Ecuadorian vs. Other | 1.71 (1.20–2.44) 0.003 | 1.83 (1.36–2.47) <0.001 | 1.74 (1.23–2.39) 0.001 | |||
| Paternal Educational level ≥Primary vs. Illiterate | 0.43 (0.29–0.63) <0.001 | 0.55 (0.39–0.79) <0.001 | 0.70(0.46–1.08) 0.106 | |||
| SES Index Medium/High vs. Low | 0.54(0.40–0.74) <0.001 | 0.70(0.53–0.91) 0.008 | 0.64(0.47–0.87) 0.004 | |||
| Area of residence Urban vs. Rural | 1.16(0.83–1.62) 0.385 | 1.33(1.0–1.78) 0.520 | 1.43(1.02–2.02) 0.038 | |||
| Household overcrowding ≥3 vs. <3 | 2.02 (1.46–2.80) <0.001 | 2.05 (1.55–2.70) <0.001 | 1.93 (1.40–2.64) <0.001 | 1.21(0.84–1.76) 0.303 | 1.82(1.34–2.48) <0.001 | 1.82(1.28–2.58) <0.001 |
| Maternal STH Infection Yes vs. No | 4.58 (3.26–6.43) <0.001 | 2.25 (1.72–2.93) <0.001 | 1.93 (1.43–2.61) <0.001 | |||
|
| 4.10(2.97–5.66) <0.001 | 2.34(1.76–3.11) <0.001 | 1.90(1.36–2.66) <0.001 | 2.34(1.61–3.40) <0.001 | 1.74(1.25–2.42) 0.001 | 1.39(0.95–2.04) 0.090 |
| T. trichiura Yes vs. No | 3.73(2.71–5.14) <0.001 | 2.07(1.56–2.75) <0.001 | 1.98(1.43–2.74) <0.001 | 2.57(1.77–3.73) <0.001 | 1.51(1.08–2.11) 0.015 | 1.46(1.0–2.13) 0.049 |
| Hookworm Yes vs. No | 2.67(1.55–4.62) <0.001 | 1.88(1.12–3.18) <0.001 | 2.02(1.13–3.61) 0.019 | |||
| Yes vs. No | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.019 | |||
| Household member with STH infection Yes vs. No | 2.71(1.97–3.74) <0.001 | 1.87(1.44–2.44) <0.001 | 1.76(1.30–2.38) <0.001 | 1.59(1.08–2.33) 0.019 | 1.25(0.92–1.70) 0.162 | 1.26(0.89–1.79) 0.193 |
Multivariable analyses included data from 1,381 children for whom we had complete data. Associations between risk factors and age at first infection were compared to children without any infection in the first 3 years of life using univariate and multivariable multinomial logistic regression. STH were detected using all 3 microscopic detection methods. Variables with more than 2 groups in Tables 1 and 2 were redefined as binary. Overcrowding was defined as number of household members per sleeping room using the mean as cut-off. SES (socioeconomic) index shows tertiles of Z scores calculated using principal components analysis. The analysis controlled also for gender of the child, number of stool samples collected and number of anthelmintic treatments received. Maternal infection intensities with A. lumbricoides and T. trichiura were not included. Paternal STH infection was excluded from the multivariate model because of missing data.
Figure 4Model of the potential effects of risk factors on the risk of STH infections.
The model shows potential effects of environmental and socioeconomic risk factors on risk of STH infections in early childhood and morbidity. Potential interventions to reduce risk of infection are illustrated with red crosses.