| Literature DB >> 35765496 |
Kadek Karang Agustina1,2, I Made Ady Wirawan3, I Made Sudarmaja4, Made Subrata3, Nyoman Sadra Dharmawan5.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Pigs are the main livestock commodity in Bali Province, Indonesia, where traditional farming practices are widely used. Traditional pig farmers are often closely associated with poverty and a perceived lack of knowledge regarding health and hygiene. Data on soil-transmitted helminthiasis (STH) and risk factors associated with STH worm infection among traditional pig farmers in Bali were previously unavailable. This study aimed to analyze the prevalence and risk factors for STH infections among traditional pig farmers in Bali Province, Indonesia. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: Ascaris; Trichuris; hookworm; risk factor; soil-transmitted helminthiasis; traditional pig farmer
Year: 2022 PMID: 35765496 PMCID: PMC9210853 DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2022.1154-1162
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet World ISSN: 0972-8988
STH infection in traditional pig farmers in Bali.
| Worm | Infection | Prevalence |
|---|---|---|
| STH | 52 | 21.8% |
| 22 | 9.2% | |
| Hookworm | 36 | 15.1% |
| 10 | 4.2% | |
| Combination of STH infection: | ||
| 9 | 3.78% | |
| 1 | 0.42% | |
| Hookworm and | 5 | 2.1% |
| 0 | 0% |
STH=Soil-transmitted helminthiasis
STH infection in the traditional pig farm.
| Worm | Infection | Prevalence |
|---|---|---|
| STH | 182 | 76.5% |
| 87 | 36.6% | |
| Hookworm | 163 | 68.5% |
| 11 | 4.6% | |
| Combination of STH infection: | ||
| 71 | 29.8% | |
| 5 | 2.1% | |
| Hookworm and | 5 | 2.1% |
| 2 | 0.84% |
STH=Soil-transmitted helminthiasis
Risk factor of STH infection in traditional pig farmers in Bali.
| Risk factor | Positive | Negative | OR (95% CI) | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
| Frek | % | Frek | % | |||
| Personal hygiene | 5.756 (2.96-11.193) | 0.000 | ||||
| Good | 17 | 7.14 | 137 | 57.56 | ||
| Poor | 35 | 14.7 | 49 | 20.59 | ||
| Sanitation | 1.914 (1.024-3.576) | 0.042 | ||||
| Good | 21 | 8.8 | 105 | 44.1 | ||
| Poor | 31 | 13 | 81 | 34 | ||
| Medical control | 1.186 (0.531-2.65) | 0.677 | ||||
| Good | 9 | 3.78 | 37 | 15.55 | ||
| Poor | 43 | 18.07 | 149 | 62.6 | ||
| Education level | 7.579 (2.621-21.915) | 0.000 | ||||
| High | 4 | 1.68 | 72 | 30.25 | ||
| Low | 48 | 20.17 | 114 | 47.9 | ||
| Income rate | 2.447 (1.122-5.338) | 0.025 | ||||
| High | 9 | 3.78 | 63 | 26.47 | ||
| Low | 43 | 18.07 | 123 | 51.68 | ||
| Main job as a pig farmer | 2.95 (1.356-6.415) | 0.006 | ||||
| No | 9 | 3.78 | 71 | 29.83 | ||
| Yes | 43 | 18.07 | 115 | 48.32 | ||
| Presence of STH infected pigs | 1.913 (0.841-4.351) | 0.122 | ||||
| No | 8 | 3.36 | 48 | 20.17 | ||
| Yes | 44 | 18.49 | 138 | 57.98 | ||
| Presence of pigsty in yard | 1.303 (0.684-2.483) | 0.421 | ||||
| No | 33 | 13.87 | 129 | 45.2 | ||
| Yes | 19 | 7.98 | 57 | 23.95 | ||
Highly significant,
Significant, OR=Odds ratio, CI=Confident interval
Risk factor of Ascaris spp. infection in traditional pig farmers in Bali.
| Risk factor | Positive | Negative | OR (95% CI) | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
| Frek | % | Frek | % | |||
| Personal hygiene | 7.561 (2.678-21.349) | 0.000 | ||||
| Good | 5 | 2.1 | 149 | 62.61 | ||
| Poor | 17 | 7.14 | 67 | 28.15 | ||
| Sanitation | 2.629 (1.031-6.705) | 0.043 | ||||
| Good | 7 | 2.94 | 119 | 50 | ||
| Poor | 15 | 6.3 | 97 | 40.76 | ||
| Medical control | 5.526 (0.724-42.195) | 0.099 | ||||
| Good | 1 | 0.42 | 45 | 18.91 | ||
| Poor | 21 | 8.82 | 171 | 71.85 | ||
| Education level | 11.170 (1.474-84.673) | 0.020 | ||||
| High | 1 | 0.42 | 75 | 31.51 | ||
| Low | 21 | 8.82 | 141 | 59.24 | ||
| Income rate | 10.283 (1.356-77.987) | 0.024 | ||||
| High | 1 | 0.42 | 71 | 29.83 | ||
| Low | 21 | 8.82 | 145 | 60.92 | ||
| Main job as a pig farmer | 5.652 (1.287-24.825) | 0.022 | ||||
| No | 2 | 0.84 | 78 | 32.77 | ||
| Yes | 20 | 8.4 | 138 | 57.98 | ||
| Presence of | 0.991 (0.389-2.466) | 0.984 | ||||
| No | 14 | 5.88 | 137 | 57.56 | ||
| Yes | 8 | 3.36 | 79 | 33.19 | ||
| Presence of pigsty in yard | 1.244 (0.498-3.105) | 0.640 | ||||
| No | 14 | 5.88 | 148 | 62.18 | ||
| Yes | 8 | 3.36 | 68 | 28.57 | ||
Highly significant,
Significant, OR=Odds ratio, CI=Confident interval
Risk factor of hookworm infection in traditional pig farmers in Bali.
| Risk factor | Positive | Negative | OR (95% CI) | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
| Frek | % | Frek | % | |||
| Personal hygiene | 3.548 (1.704-7.391) | 0.001 | ||||
| Good | 14 | 5.88 | 140 | 58.82 | ||
| Poor | 22 | 9.24 | 62 | 26.05 | ||
| Sanitation | 1.310 (0.644-2.666) | 0.456 | ||||
| Good | 17 | 7.14 | 109 | 45.8 | ||
| Poor | 19 | 7.98 | 93 | 39.08 | ||
| Medical control | 0.673 (0.292-1.55) | 0.352 | ||||
| Good | 9 | 3.78 | 37 | 15.55 | ||
| Poor | 27 | 11.34 | 165 | 69.33 | ||
| Education level | 6.225 (1.845-21.006) | 0.003 | ||||
| High | 3 | 1.26 | 73 | 30.67 | ||
| Low | 33 | 13.87 | 129 | 54.2 | ||
| Income rate | 1.623 (0.701-3.59) | 0.258 | ||||
| High | 8 | 3.36 | 64 | 26.89 | ||
| Low | 28 | 11.76 | 138 | 57.98 | ||
| Main job as a pig farmer | 2.891 (1.15-7.268) | 0.024 | ||||
| No | 6 | 2.52 | 74 | 31.09 | ||
| Yes | 30 | 12.61 | 128 | 53.78 | ||
| Presence of hookworm infected pigs | 2.102 (0.876-5.046) | 0.096 | ||||
| No | 7 | 2.94 | 68 | 28.57 | ||
| Yes | 29 | 12.18 | 134 | 56.3 | ||
| Presence of pigsty in yard | 1.247 (0.594-2.62) | 0.56 | ||||
| No | 23 | 9.66 | 139 | 58.4 | ||
| Yes | 13 | 5.46 | 63 | 26.47 | ||
Highly significant,
Significant, OR=Odds ratio, CI=Confident interval
Risk factor of Trichuris spp. infection in traditional pig farmers in Bali.
| Risk factor | Positive | Negative | OR (95% CI) | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
| Frek | % | Frek | % | |||
| Personal hygiene | 8.00 (1.658-38.598) | 0.01 | ||||
| Good | 2 | 0.84 | 152 | 63.87 | ||
| Poor | 8 | 3.36 | 76 | 31.93 | ||
| Sanitation | 4.769 (0.991-22.953) | 0.05 | ||||
| Good | 2 | 0.84 | 124 | 52.1 | ||
| Poor | 8 | 3.36 | 104 | 43.7 | ||
| Medical control | 2.213 (0.273-17.921) | 0.457 | ||||
| Good | 1 | 0.42 | 45 | 18.91 | ||
| Poor | 9 | 3.78 | 183 | 78.15 | ||
| Education level | 4.412 (0.549-35.469) | 0.163 | ||||
| High | 1 | 0.42 | 75 | 31.51 | ||
| Low | 9 | 3.78 | 153 | 64.29 | ||
| Income rate | 1.772 (0.367-8.559) | 0.476 | ||||
| High | 2 | 0.84 | 70 | 29.41 | ||
| Low | 8 | 3.36 | 158 | 66.39 | ||
| Main job as a pig farmer | 2.422 (0.279-21.025) | 0.422 | ||||
| No | 9 | 0.42 | 218 | 91.6 | ||
| Yes | 1 | 3.78 | 10 | 4.2 | ||
| Presence of | 2.422 (0.279-21.025) | 0.422 | ||||
| No | 9 | 3.78 | 218 | 91.6 | ||
| Yes | 1 | 0.42 | 10 | 4.2 | ||
| Presence of pigsty in yard | 1.444 (0.395-5.277) | 0.578 | ||||
| No | 6 | 2.52 | 156 | 69.33 | ||
| Yes | 4 | 1.68 | 72 | 30.25 | ||
Highly significant,
Significant. OR=Odds ratio, CI=Confident interval