| Literature DB >> 24587289 |
Bin Lin1, Yufeng Wang1, Zhen Wang2, Huilian Tan2, Xianghua Kong3, Yang Shu1, Yuchao Zhang1, Yun Huang1, Yufei Zhu1, Heng Xu1, Zhiqiang Wang1, Ping Wang1, Guang Ning4, Xiangyin Kong5, Guohong Hu1, Landian Hu5.
Abstract
Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common birth defect affecting the structure and function of fetal hearts. Despite decades of extensive studies, the genetic mechanism of sporadic CHD remains obscure. Deleted in liver cancer 1 (DLC1) gene, encoding a GTPase-activating protein, is highly expressed in heart and essential for heart development according to the knowledge of Dlc1-deficient mice. To determine whether DLC1 is a susceptibility gene for sporadic CHD, we sequenced the coding region of DLC1 isoform 1 in 151 sporadic CHD patients and identified 13 non-synonymous rare variants (including 6 private variants) in the case cohort. Importantly, these rare variants (8/13) were enriched in the N-terminal region of the DLC1 isoform 1 protein. Seven of eight amino acids at the N-terminal variant positions were conserved among the primates. Among the 9 rare variants that were predicted as "damaging", five were located at the N-terminal region. Ensuing in vitro functional assays showed that three private variants (Met360Lys, Glu418Lys and Asp554Val) impaired the ability of DLC1 to inhibit cell migration or altered the subcellular location of the protein compared to wild-type DLC1 isoform 1. These data suggest that DLC1 might act as a CHD-associated gene in addition to its role as a tumor suppressor in cancer.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24587289 PMCID: PMC3938602 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090215
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
The rare variants identified in DLC1 isoform 1.
| Variant type | Patient ID | Gender | Age of diagnosis | Diagnosis | Exon | Nucleotide alterationa | Amino acid alteration | SIFT score | SIFT prediction ( | Number of mutations in patients | Number of mutations in controls | In dbSNPb | ALT allele frequency in dbSNPc |
| Private variants | 67 | M | 5 | VSD&PFO | 2 | c.797G>A | p.Gly266Glu | 0.406 | Tolerated | 1/151 | 0/900 | Na | Na |
| 153 | F | 8 | VSD | 3 | c.1048G>A* | p.Ala350Thr | 0.368 | Tolerated | 1/151 | 0/900 | Na | Na | |
| 168 | F | 5 | ASD | 3 | c.1079T>A* | p.Met360Lys | 0.001 | Damaging | 1/151 | 0/900 | Na | Na | |
| 169 | F | 22 | PS | 4 | c.1252G>A* | p.Glu418Lys | 0.027 | Damaging | 1/151 | 0/900 | Na | Na | |
| 89 | F | 2 | PDA | 4 | c.1298C>A | p.Thr433Asn | 0.02 | Damaging | 1/151 | 0/900 | Na | Na | |
| 131 | F | 8 | PDA | 9 | c.[1661A>T(+)1662T>C]* | p.Asp554Val | 0.014 | Damaging | 1/151 | 0/900 | Na | Na | |
| 190 | F | 7 | VSD | 9 | c.[1661A>T(+)1662T>C]* | p.Asp554Val | 0.014 | Damaging | 1/151 | 0/900 | Na | Na | |
| Other rare variants | 49 | F | 9 | TOF | 2 | c.659C>T | p.Ala220Val | 1 | Tolerated | 1/151 | 1/900 | Na | Na |
| 61 | F | 6 | TOF | 3 | c.1051C>T | p.Arg351Trp | 0 | Damaging | 1/151 | 2/900 | rs144283917 | 2.324/5869 | |
| 42 | F | 17 | VSD | 4 | c.1237T>A* | p.Leu413Met | 0.005 | Damaging | 1/151 | 0/900 | rs143447199 | 1/4545 | |
| 55 | F | 26 | PDA | 9 | c.1683C>A | p.Asp561Glu | 0.171 | Tolerated | 1/151 | 2/900 | rs201661577 | 5/2174 | |
| 124 | F | 4 | VSD | 9 | c.2854C>G* | p.Leu952Val | 0.003 | Damaging | 1/151 | 0/900 | rs184157214 | 1/2000 | |
| 28 | M | 1 | VSD | 16 | c.4111G>C* | p.Val1371Leu | 0.016 | Damaging | 1/151 | 0/900 | rs142865083 | 1/2000 | |
| 8 | M | 12 | VSD | 18 | c.4533C>G | p.Ile1511Met | 0.001 | Damaging | 1/151 | 0/900 | rs78322853 | Na |
Note. Na, no available data; M, male; F, female; VSD, ventricular septal defect; PFO, patent foramen ovale; ASD, atrial septal defect; PS, pulmonary stenosis; PDA, patent ductus arteriosus; TOF, tetralogy of Fallot. a, Nucleotide numbering is according to the RefSeq database NM_182643.2. b, The version of dbSNP used in the table is dbSNP build 137. c, The alternative allele frequency form the dbSNP database is calculated by the alternative allele count/two times the number of individuals assayed. *The mutant vectors were constructed according to these variants.
Figure 1Rare variants identified in DLC1 isoform 1.
(A) The locations of the rare variants are indicated by black lines on the DLC1 isoform 1 protein. FAT (focal adhesion targeting) region, SAM (sterile alpha motif), Rho-Gap (Rho-GTPase-activating protein) and START (steroidogenic acute regulatory protein related lipid transfer) domains are indicated by different colors. Stars denote the private variants identified in the CHD cohort. (B) DLC1 isoform 1 possesses an extended N-terminal region compared to isoform 2. The first 437 residues of isoform 1 are missing in isoform 2, and the sequence ‘TAIQGISEKEKAE’ is replaced by ‘MCRKKPDTMILTQ’ in isoform 2. The yellow box indicates the SAM domain in DLC1, and the green box shows the N-terminal region. (C) The conservation of residues in the N-terminal region was analyzed in different species. The primates and non-primates are separated by the blue lines in the boxes. Asterisks indicate the residues that are conserved among the primates. The residues that are conserved in the primates and non-primates locate in the red boxes. The UniProt accession ID is followed by a colon and the corresponding species name. (D) The private variants that altered the regulation of cell migration function of DLC1 are shown.
Figure 2DLC1 isoform 1 mutants had different effects on cell migration compared with the wild type protein.
(A) Western blot analyses of DLC1 isoform 1 mutant overexpression in two endothelial cell lines, HUVEC and HBMEC-60. In HUVECs, the effect of DLC1 isoform 1 mutation on the GAP activity of the protein was detected by western blotting. (B) Representative images of the Transwell migration assay using HUVECs cells are shown. (C) The quantification of HUVEC and HBMEC-60 migration showed significant differences between wild-type DLC1 and Mutants 2, 4 and 5, whereas the other mutants showed no significant difference from wild-type DLC1. Wild-type DLC1 also showed an inhibitory effect on cell migration compared to the control vector. *Student's t-test ; ** . Scale bars, 100 µm. Ns, not significant.
Figure 3The subcellular localization of wild-type DLC1 and mutants in HUVECs.
(A) Images of wild-type and mutant DLC1 distribution in HUVECs using laser scanning confocal microscopy. (B) The percentage of cells with wild-type and mutant DLC1 proteins with exclusive cytoplasmic-localization. Mutant 4 showed a significant difference from the wild type, as opposed to the control vector. *Student's t-test ; ** . Scale bar, 25 µm. Ns, not significant.