Literature DB >> 24583751

Development and validation of a risk stratification-based screening model for predicting colorectal advanced neoplasia in Korea.

Dong Hyun Kim1, Jae Myung Cha, Hyun Phil Shin, Kwang Ro Joo, Joung Il Lee, Dong Il Park.   

Abstract

GOALS: To develop and validate a risk stratification-based screening model for predicting colorectal advanced neoplasia in Korea.
BACKGROUND: Colorectal advanced neoplasia is the relevant finding of screening colonoscopy. Risk estimation for advanced neoplasia may be helpful to improve compliance and to develop more cost-effective approaches toward screening. STUDY: We developed Korean Colorectal Screening (KCS) score by optimizing and adjusting Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening (APCS) score to predict advanced neoplasia in an asymptomatic Korean population who received screening colonoscopies from September 2006 to September 2009. Moreover, we validated the KCS score in another Korean cohort who received screening colonoscopies from October 2009 to February 2011. We also assessed the predictive power and diagnostic performance of both KCS and APCS scores.
RESULTS: There were 3561 subjects in the derivation cohort and 1316 subjects in the validation cohort, with a prevalence of advanced neoplasia of 4.7% and 4.3%, respectively. After a multivariate analysis, KCS was developed as 0 to 8 points comprising of age, sex, body mass index, smoking, and family history of CRC. Using KCS scores to stratify the validation cohort, the prevalences of advanced neoplasia in the 3 risk tiers (average, moderate, and high) were 2.0%, 3.7%, and 10.9%, respectively. Moderate-risk and high-risk tiers showed 2.1- and 6.5-fold increased prevalences, respectively, of advanced neoplasia compared with average risk tier. In addition, KCS score showed relatively good discriminative power (ROC=0.681) and higher sensitivity compared with APCS score for the high-risk tier.
CONCLUSIONS: KCS score may be clinically simple and useful for assessing advanced neoplasia risk in Korea. However, racial disparity should be considered in risk stratification-based screening in each country.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24583751     DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0192-0790            Impact factor:   3.062


  20 in total

1.  Impact of Age on the Risk of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in a Young Population: An Analysis Using the Predicted Probability Model.

Authors:  Yoon Suk Jung; Chan Hyuk Park; Nam Hee Kim; Mi Yeon Lee; Dong Il Park
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Do recent epidemiologic observations impact who and how we should screen for CRC?

Authors:  Ethan Bortniker; Joseph C Anderson
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Predicting posttraumatic stress disorder following a natural disaster.

Authors:  Anthony J Rosellini; Francisca Dussaillant; José R Zubizarreta; Ronald C Kessler; Sherri Rose
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 4.791

4.  A scoring model for predicting advanced colorectal neoplasia in a screened population of asymptomatic Japanese individuals.

Authors:  Masau Sekiguchi; Yasuo Kakugawa; Minori Matsumoto; Takahisa Matsuda
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 7.527

5.  A New Comprehensive Colorectal Cancer Risk Prediction Model Incorporating Family History, Personal Characteristics, and Environmental Factors.

Authors:  Mark A Jenkins; Polly A Newcomb; Yingye Zheng; Xinwei Hua; Aung K Win; Robert J MacInnis; Steven Gallinger; Loic Le Marchand; Noralane M Lindor; John A Baron; John L Hopper; James G Dowty; Antonis C Antoniou; Jiayin Zheng
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Comparison of multiple statistical models for the development of clinical prediction scores to detect advanced colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic Thai patients.

Authors:  Kamonwan Soonklang; Boonying Siribumrungwong; Bunchorn Siripongpreeda; Chirayu Auewarakul
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Clinical risk stratification model for advanced colorectal neoplasia in persons with negative fecal immunochemical test results.

Authors:  Yoon Suk Jung; Chan Hyuk Park; Nam Hee Kim; Jung Ho Park; Dong Il Park; Chong Il Sohn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Impact of Fecal Hb Levels on Advanced Neoplasia Detection and the Diagnostic Miss Rate For Colorectal Cancer Screening in High-Risk vs. Average-Risk Subjects: a Multi-Center Study.

Authors:  Satimai Aniwan; Thawee Ratanachu-Ek; Supot Pongprasobchai; Julajak Limsrivilai; Ong-Ard Praisontarangkul; Pises Pisespongsa; Pisaln Mairiang; Apichat Sangchan; Jaksin Sottisuporn; Naruemon Wisedopas; Pinit Kullavanijaya; Rungsun Rerknimitr
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 4.488

9.  Association between investigator-measured body-mass index and colorectal adenoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 168,201 subjects.

Authors:  Martin Chi-Sang Wong; Chun-Hei Chan; Wilson Cheung; Din-Hei Fung; Miaoyin Liang; Jason Li-Wen Huang; Yan-Hong Wang; Johnny Yu Jiang; Chun-Pong Yu; Harry Haoxiang Wang; Justin Che-Yuen Wu; Francis Ka-Leung Chan; Joseph Jao-Yiu Sung
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 8.082

10.  The discriminatory capability of existing scores to predict advanced colorectal neoplasia: a prospective colonoscopy study of 5,899 screening participants.

Authors:  Martin C S Wong; Jessica Y L Ching; Simpson Ng; Thomas Y T Lam; Arthur K C Luk; Sunny H Wong; Siew C Ng; Simon S M Ng; Justin C Y Wu; Francis K L Chan; Joseph J Y Sung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.