Literature DB >> 24583155

Impact of mechanical activation, scar, and electrical timing on cardiac resynchronization therapy response and clinical outcomes.

Kenneth C Bilchick1, Sujith Kuruvilla2, Yasmin S Hamirani2, Raghav Ramachandran3, Samantha A Clarke3, Katherine M Parker3, George J Stukenborg4, Pamela Mason2, John D Ferguson2, J Randall Moorman2, Rohit Malhotra2, J Michael Mangrum2, Andrew E Darby2, John Dimarco2, Jeffrey W Holmes5, Michael Salerno6, Christopher M Kramer7, Frederick H Epstein8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), we sought to evaluate the relative influences of mechanical, electrical, and scar properties at the left ventricular lead position (LVLP) on cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response and clinical events.
BACKGROUND: CMR cine displacement encoding with stimulated echoes (DENSE) provides high-quality strain for overall dyssynchrony (circumferential uniformity ratio estimate [CURE] 0 to 1) and timing of onset of circumferential contraction at the LVLP. CMR DENSE, late gadolinium enhancement, and electrical timing together could improve upon other imaging modalities for evaluating the optimal LVLP.
METHODS: Patients had complete CMR studies and echocardiography before CRT. CRT response was defined as a 15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume. Electrical activation was assessed as the time from QRS onset to LVLP electrogram (QLV). Patients were then followed for clinical events.
RESULTS: In 75 patients, multivariable logistic modeling accurately identified the 40 patients (53%) with CRT response (area under the curve: 0.95 [p < 0.0001]) based on CURE (odds ratio [OR]: 2.59/0.1 decrease), delayed circumferential contraction onset at LVLP (OR: 6.55), absent LVLP scar (OR: 14.9), and QLV (OR: 1.31/10 ms increase). The 33% of patients with CURE <0.70, absence of LVLP scar, and delayed LVLP contraction onset had a 100% response rate, whereas those with CURE ≥0.70 had a 0% CRT response rate and a 12-fold increased risk of death; the remaining patients had a mixed response profile.
CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical, electrical, and scar properties at the LVLP together with CMR mechanical dyssynchrony are strongly associated with echocardiographic CRT response and clinical events after CRT. Modeling these findings holds promise for improving CRT outcomes.
Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac magnetic resonance; cardiac resynchronization therapy; heart failure; myocardial infarction; ventricular tachycardia

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24583155      PMCID: PMC4427624          DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  25 in total

1.  Targeted left ventricular lead placement to guide cardiac resynchronization therapy: the TARGET study: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Fakhar Z Khan; Mumohan S Virdee; Christopher R Palmer; Peter J Pugh; Denis O'Halloran; Maros Elsik; Philip A Read; David Begley; Simon P Fynn; David P Dutka
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Myocardial tissue tracking with two-dimensional cine displacement-encoded MR imaging: development and initial evaluation.

Authors:  Daniel Kim; Wesley D Gilson; Christopher M Kramer; Frederick H Epstein
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update of the 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Cynthia M Tracy; Andrew E Epstein; Dawood Darbar; John P Dimarco; Sandra B Dunbar; N A Mark Estes; T Bruce Ferguson; Stephen C Hammill; Pamela E Karasik; Mark S Link; Joseph E Marine; Mark H Schoenfeld; Amit J Shanker; Michael J Silka; Lynne Warner Stevenson; William G Stevenson; Paul D Varosy
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Effect of epicardial or biventricular pacing to prolong QT interval and increase transmural dispersion of repolarization: does resynchronization therapy pose a risk for patients predisposed to long QT or torsade de pointes?

Authors:  Victor A Medina-Ravell; Ramarao S Lankipalli; Gan-Xin Yan; Charles Antzelevitch; Napoleon A Medina-Malpica; Otto A Medina-Malpica; Christopher Droogan; Peter R Kowey
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-02-11       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Echocardiography-guided left ventricular lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy: results of the Speckle Tracking Assisted Resynchronization Therapy for Electrode Region trial.

Authors:  Samir Saba; Josef Marek; David Schwartzman; Sandeep Jain; Evan Adelstein; Pamela White; Olusegun A Oyenuga; Tetsuari Onishi; Prem Soman; John Gorcsan
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 8.790

6.  Systolic myocardial dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: identification at MR imaging with cine displacement encoding with stimulated echoes.

Authors:  Laura Ernande; Hélène Thibault; Cyrille Bergerot; Phillippe Moulin; Han Wen; Geneviève Derumeaux; Pierre Croisille
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Systolic improvement and mechanical resynchronization does not require electrical synchrony in the dilated failing heart with left bundle-branch block.

Authors:  Christophe Leclercq; Owen Faris; Richard Tunin; Jennifer Johnson; Ritsuchi Kato; Frank Evans; Julio Spinelli; Henry Halperin; Elliot McVeigh; David A Kass
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 8.  Association between QRS duration and outcome with cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Adam R Bryant; Stephen B Wilton; Michael P Lai; Derek V Exner
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 1.438

9.  Postprocedure mapping of cardiac resynchronization lead position using standard fluoroscopy systems: implications for the nonresponder with scar.

Authors:  Katherine M Parker; Ethan Bunting; Rohit Malhotra; Samantha A Clarke; Pamela Mason; Andrew E Darby; Christopher M Kramer; Michael Salerno; Jeffrey W Holmes; Kenneth C Bilchick
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 1.976

10.  The relationship between ventricular electrical delay and left ventricular remodelling with cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Michael R Gold; Ulrika Birgersdotter-Green; Jagmeet P Singh; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Yinghong Yu; Timothy E Meyer; Milan Seth; Patrick J Tchou
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  47 in total

1.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy reduces expression of inflammation-promoting genes related to interleukin-1β in heart failure.

Authors:  Kenneth Bilchick; Hema Kothari; Aditya Narayan; James Garmey; Abdullah Omar; Brian Capaldo; Coleen McNamara
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 10.787

Review 2.  Does cardiac resynchronization therapy benefit patients with right bundle branch block: left ventricular free wall pacing: seldom right for right bundle branch block.

Authors:  Kenneth C Bilchick
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-06

3.  Associations between scar characteristics by cardiac magnetic resonance and changes in left ventricular ejection fraction in primary prevention defibrillator recipients.

Authors:  Yiyi Zhang; Eliseo Guallar; Robert G Weiss; Michael Stillabower; Gary Gerstenblith; Gordon F Tomaselli; Katherine C Wu
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 4.  Role of Imaging Techniques for Diagnosis, Prognosis and Management of Heart Failure Patients: Cardiac Magnetic Resonance.

Authors:  Jorge A Gonzalez; Christopher M Kramer
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2015-08

5.  Role of Cardiac MR Imaging in Cardiomyopathies.

Authors:  Christopher M Kramer
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators With Versus Without Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With a QRS Duration >180 ms.

Authors:  Varun Sundaram; Jayakumar Sahadevan; Albert L Waldo; George J Stukenborg; Yogesh N V Reddy; Samuel J Asirvatham; Judith A Mackall; Anselma Intini; Brigid Wilson; Daniel I Simon; Kenneth C Bilchick
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Imaging left-ventricular mechanical activation in heart failure patients using cine DENSE MRI: Validation and implications for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Daniel A Auger; Kenneth C Bilchick; Jorge A Gonzalez; Sophia X Cui; Jeffrey W Holmes; Christopher M Kramer; Michael Salerno; Frederick H Epstein
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Typical readout durations in spiral cine DENSE yield blurred images and underestimate cardiac strains at both 3.0 T and 1.5 T.

Authors:  Gregory J Wehner; Jonathan D Suever; Samuel W Fielden; David K Powell; Sean M Hamlet; Moriel H Vandsburger; Christopher M Haggerty; Xiaodong Zhong; Brandon K Fornwalt
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 2.546

9.  Singular Value Decomposition Applied to Cardiac Strain from MR Imaging for Selection of Optimal Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Candidates.

Authors:  Raghav Ramachandran; Xiao Chen; Christopher M Kramer; Frederick H Epstein; Kenneth C Bilchick
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Reproducibility of cine displacement encoding with stimulated echoes (DENSE) in human subjects.

Authors:  Kai Lin; Leng Meng; Jeremy D Collins; Varun Chowdhary; Michael Markl; James C Carr
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.