Literature DB >> 23476053

Echocardiography-guided left ventricular lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy: results of the Speckle Tracking Assisted Resynchronization Therapy for Electrode Region trial.

Samir Saba1, Josef Marek, David Schwartzman, Sandeep Jain, Evan Adelstein, Pamela White, Olusegun A Oyenuga, Tetsuari Onishi, Prem Soman, John Gorcsan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure (HF) with wide QRS complex and diminished left ventricular (LV) function, but response is variable. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The Speckle Tracking Assisted Resynchronization Therapy for Electrode Region (STARTER) was a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial testing the hypothesis that an incremental benefit to cardiac resynchronization therapy would be gained by echo-guided (EG) transvenous LV lead placement versus a routine fluoroscopic approach. EG LV lead placement was attempted at the site of latest time to peak radial strain by speckle tracking echocardiography. The prespecified primary end point was first HF hospitalization or death. Of 187 New York Heart Association class II to IV patients with HF (62% ischemic; ejection fraction 26±6%; QRS 159±27 ms), 110 were randomized to EG and 77 to routine strategies. Primary events included 30 deaths and 37 HF hospitalizations over 1.8 years. Using intention-to-treat, patients randomized to an EG strategy had a significantly more favorable event-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.82; P=0.006). Exact or adjacent concordance of LV lead with latest site could be achieved in 85% of the EG group and occurred fortuitously in 66% of controls (P=0.010) and was associated with an improvement in event-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.71; P=0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: A strategy of EG LV lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy improved patient outcomes by reducing the combined risk of death or HF hospitalizations and has implications for delivery of cardiac resynchronization therapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00156390.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LV lead position; cardiac resynchronization therapy; death; heart failure hospitalization; speckle tracking echocardiography

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23476053     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.000078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Heart Fail        ISSN: 1941-3289            Impact factor:   8.790


  83 in total

1.  Influence of QRS duration on outcome of death or appropriate defibrillator therapy by strategy of left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients.

Authors:  Samir Saba; Josef Marek; Mian Bilal Alam; Evan Adelstein; David Schwartzman; Sandeep Jain; John Gorcsan
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  Nuclear Image-Guided Approaches for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT).

Authors:  Weihua Zhou; Ernest V Garcia
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Is speckle tracking actually helpful for cardiac resynchronization therapy?

Authors:  Hidekazu Tanaka; Ken-Ichi Hirata
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2016-01-14

4.  Nuclear image-guided left ventricular pacing lead navigation feasibility of a new technique.

Authors:  Daniel R Ludwig; Prahlad G Menon; David Schwartzman
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Using three-dimensional echocardiography to guide left ventricle lead position in cardiac resynchronization therapy: does it make any difference.

Authors:  Haitham A Badran; John Z Kamel; Tarek R Mohamed; Mohamed A Abdelhamid
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 6.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy: Dire need for targeted left ventricular lead placement and optimal device programming.

Authors:  Sokratis Pastromas; Antonis S Manolis
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-12-26

7.  Impact of mechanical activation, scar, and electrical timing on cardiac resynchronization therapy response and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Kenneth C Bilchick; Sujith Kuruvilla; Yasmin S Hamirani; Raghav Ramachandran; Samantha A Clarke; Katherine M Parker; George J Stukenborg; Pamela Mason; John D Ferguson; J Randall Moorman; Rohit Malhotra; J Michael Mangrum; Andrew E Darby; John Dimarco; Jeffrey W Holmes; Michael Salerno; Christopher M Kramer; Frederick H Epstein
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 8.  State-of-the-art narrative review: multimodality imaging in electrophysiology and cardiac device therapies.

Authors:  Balint Laczay; Divyang Patel; Richard Grimm; Bo Xu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06

9.  Not left ventricular lead position, but the extent of immediate asynchrony reduction predicts long-term response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Wolfram C Poller; Henryk Dreger; Marius Schwerg; Hansjürgen Bondke; Christoph Melzer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.460

10.  Parametric ultrasound and fluoroscopy image fusion for guidance of left ventricle lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Aleksandar Babic; Hans Henrik Odland; Olivier Gérard; Eigil Samset
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-05-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.