Benedetta Allegranzi1, Laurie Conway2, Elaine Larson2, Didier Pittet3. 1. First Global Patient Safety Challenge, World Health Organization Patient Safety Program, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. 2. Columbia University School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY. 3. Infection Control Program and WHO Collaborating Centre on Patient Safety, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland. Electronic address: didier.pittet@hcuge.ch.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) launched a multimodal strategy and campaign in 2009 to improve hand hygiene practices worldwide. Our objective was to evaluate the implementation of the strategy in United States health care facilities. METHODS: From July through December 2011, US facilities participating in the WHO global campaign were invited to complete the Hand Hygiene Self-Assessment Framework online, a validated tool based on the WHO multimodal strategy. RESULTS: Of 2,238 invited facilities, 168 participated in the survey (7.5%). A detailed analysis of 129, mainly nonteaching public facilities (80.6%), showed that most had an advanced or intermediate level of hand hygiene implementation progress (48.9% and 45.0%, respectively). The total Hand Hygiene Self-Assessment Framework score was 36 points higher for facilities with staffing levels of infection preventionists > 0.75/100 beds than for those with lower ratios (P = .01) and 41 points higher for facilities participating in hand hygiene campaigns (P = .002). CONCLUSION: Despite the low response rate, the survey results are unique and allow interesting reflections. Whereas the level of progress of most participating facilities was encouraging, this may reflect reporting bias, ie, better hospitals more likely to report. However, even in respondents, further improvement can be achieved, in particular by embedding hand hygiene in a stronger institutional safety climate and optimizing staffing levels dedicated to infection prevention. These results should encourage the launch of a coordinated national campaign and higher participation in the WHO global campaign.
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) launched a multimodal strategy and campaign in 2009 to improve hand hygiene practices worldwide. Our objective was to evaluate the implementation of the strategy in United States health care facilities. METHODS: From July through December 2011, US facilities participating in the WHO global campaign were invited to complete the Hand Hygiene Self-Assessment Framework online, a validated tool based on the WHO multimodal strategy. RESULTS: Of 2,238 invited facilities, 168 participated in the survey (7.5%). A detailed analysis of 129, mainly nonteaching public facilities (80.6%), showed that most had an advanced or intermediate level of hand hygiene implementation progress (48.9% and 45.0%, respectively). The total Hand Hygiene Self-Assessment Framework score was 36 points higher for facilities with staffing levels of infection preventionists > 0.75/100 beds than for those with lower ratios (P = .01) and 41 points higher for facilities participating in hand hygiene campaigns (P = .002). CONCLUSION: Despite the low response rate, the survey results are unique and allow interesting reflections. Whereas the level of progress of most participating facilities was encouraging, this may reflect reporting bias, ie, better hospitals more likely to report. However, even in respondents, further improvement can be achieved, in particular by embedding hand hygiene in a stronger institutional safety climate and optimizing staffing levels dedicated to infection prevention. These results should encourage the launch of a coordinated national campaign and higher participation in the WHO global campaign.
Authors: N W Weissman; J J Allison; C I Kiefe; R M Farmer; M T Weaver; O D Williams; I G Child; J H Pemberton; K C Brown; C S Baker Journal: J Eval Clin Pract Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: Mary F Wisniewski; Seijeoung Kim; William E Trick; Sharon F Welbel; Robert A Weinstein Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2006-12-15 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: William E Trick; Michael O Vernon; Sharon F Welbel; Patricia Demarais; Mary K Hayden; Robert A Weinstein Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2007-01-03 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Amy D Waterman; Thomas H Gallagher; Jane Garbutt; Brian M Waterman; Victoria Fraser; Thomas E Burroughs Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Elaine L Larson; Meghan T Murray; Bevin Cohen; Edwin Simpser; Marianne Pavia; Olivia Jackson; Haomiao Jia; R Gordon Hutcheon; Linda Mosiello; Natalie Neu; Lisa Saiman Journal: Behav Med Date: 2017-03-03 Impact factor: 3.104
Authors: Wrg Perry; S Bagheri Nejad; K Tuomisto; N Kara; N Roos; T R Dilip; L R Hirschhorn; I Larizgoitia; K Semrau; M Mathai; N Dhingra-Kumar Journal: BMJ Glob Health Date: 2017-08-19
Authors: Seven Johannes Sam Aghdassi; Andrea Grisold; Agnes Wechsler-Fördös; Sonja Hansen; Peter Bischoff; Michael Behnke; Petra Gastmeier Journal: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Date: 2020-06-22 Impact factor: 4.887