Literature DB >> 10461579

Achievable benchmarks of care: the ABCs of benchmarking.

N W Weissman1, J J Allison, C I Kiefe, R M Farmer, M T Weaver, O D Williams, I G Child, J H Pemberton, K C Brown, C S Baker.   

Abstract

Benchmarking is generally considered to be an important tool for quality improvement. Traditional approaches to benchmarking have relied on subjective identification of 'leaders in the field'. We derive an objective, reproducible and attainable Achievable Benchmark of Care (ABC) by measuring and analysing performance on process-of-care indicators. Three characteristics of the ABC that we deem essential are: (1) benchmarks represent a measurable level of excellence; (2) benchmarks are demonstrably attainable; (3) benchmarks are derived from data in an objective, reproducible and predetermined fashion. From these characteristics it follows that (4) providers with high performance are selected to define a level of excellence in a predetermined fashion, but (5) providers with high performance on small numbers of cases do not influence unduly benchmark levels. We use the 'pared mean' to operationalize the ABC. Roughly, the pared mean summarizes the performance of top-ranked providers whereby at least 10% of the patient pool across all providers is included. Bayesian estimators for adjustment of performance of providers with small sample sizes are used to rank providers. Randomized controlled trials to assess the independent effect of the ABC in quality improvement projects are under way. We have developed a methodology objectively and reproducibly to derive a level of excellent, attainable performance, based on measured performance by a group of providers. The ABC can be applied to groups of providers in communities, to institutions and departments within them, or to individual practitioners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10461579     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.1999.00203.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  38 in total

1.  Educating Physicians-in-Training About Resource Utilization and Their Own Outcomes of Care in the Inpatient Setting.

Authors:  C Jessica Dine; Jean Miller; Alexander Fuld; Lisa M Bellini; Theodore J Iwashyna
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2010-06

2.  Developing a benchmarking process in perfusion: a report of the Perfusion Downunder Collaboration.

Authors:  Robert A Baker; Richard F Newland; Carmel Fenton; Michael McDonald; Timothy W Willcox; Alan F Merry
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2012-03

3.  A web-based diabetes intervention for physician: a cluster-randomized effectiveness trial.

Authors:  Carlos A Estrada; Monika M Safford; Amanda H Salanitro; Thomas K Houston; William Curry; Jessica H Williams; Fernando Ovalle; Yongin Kim; Pamela Foster; Jeroan J Allison
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.038

4.  Commentary: measuring quality of care in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Stuart L Silverman; Jeffrey Curtis
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Risk-adjusted comparison of blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) noncontrol in primary care offices.

Authors:  Karl Hammermeister; Michael Bronsert; William G Henderson; Letoynia Coombs; Patrick Hosokawa; Elias Brandt; Cathy Bryan; Robert Valuck; David West; Winston Liaw; Michael Ho; Wilson Pace
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.657

6.  Lymph node evaluation as a colon cancer quality measure: a national hospital report card.

Authors:  Karl Y Bilimoria; David J Bentrem; Andrew K Stewart; Mark S Talamonti; David P Winchester; Thomas R Russell; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  Complications for racial and ethnic minority groups after total hip and knee replacement: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Benedict U Nwachukwu; Adrian D Kenny; Elena Losina; Lori B Chibnik; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Status of the implementation of the World Health Organization multimodal hand hygiene strategy in United States of America health care facilities.

Authors:  Benedetta Allegranzi; Laurie Conway; Elaine Larson; Didier Pittet
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.918

9.  Colorectal cancer screening in primary care: theoretical model to improve prevalence in the practice partner research network.

Authors:  Lynne S Nemeth; Ruth G Jenkins; Paul J Nietert; Steven M Ornstein
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2009-03-18

10.  [Potentials and limitations of the planned compulsory quality assurance program for cataract surgery (Qesü)].

Authors:  U Hahn; B Bertram; F Krummenauer; A Reuscher; E Fabian; T Neuhann; S Schmickler; I Neuhann
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.