Literature DB >> 24571677

Test the reliability of doubly robust estimation with missing response data.

Baojiang Chen1, Jing Qin.   

Abstract

In statistical inference, one has to make sure that the underlying regression model is correctly specified otherwise the resulting estimation may be biased. Model checking is an important method to detect any departure of the regression model from the true one. Missing data are a ubiquitous problem in social and medical studies. If the underlying regression model is correctly specified, recent researches show great popularity of the doubly robust (DR) estimates method for handling missing data because of its robustness to the misspecification of either the missing data model or the conditional mean model, that is, the model for the conditional expectation of true regression model conditioning on the observed quantities. However, little work has been devoted to the goodness of fit test for DR estimates method. In this article, we propose a testing method to assess the reliability of the estimator derived from the DR estimating equation with possibly missing response and always observed auxiliary variables. Numerical studies demonstrate that the proposed test can control type I errors well. Furthermore the proposed method can detect departures from model assumptions in the marginal mean model of interest powerfully. A real dementia data set is used to illustrate the method for the diagnosis of model misspecification in the problem of missing response with an always observed auxiliary variable for cross-sectional data.
© 2014, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auxiliary; Doubly robust; Estimating equation; Goodness of fit; Missing data

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24571677      PMCID: PMC4061274          DOI: 10.1111/biom.12150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  15 in total

1.  Model-checking techniques based on cumulative residuals.

Authors:  D Y Lin; L J Wei; Z Ying
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: a comparative study.

Authors:  Jared K Lunceford; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models.

Authors:  Heejung Bang; James M Robins
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Doubly robust generalized estimating equations for longitudinal data.

Authors:  Shaun Seaman; Andrew Copas
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Comment: Demystifying Double Robustness: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating a Population Mean from Incomplete Data.

Authors:  Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.901

Review 6.  Surrogate end points in clinical trials: are we being misled?

Authors:  T R Fleming; D L DeMets
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  J Wittes; E Lakatos; J Probstfield
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Modeling the relationship between survival and CD4 lymphocytes in patients with AIDS and AIDS-related complex.

Authors:  V De Gruttola; M Wulfsohn; M A Fischl; A Tsiatis
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr (1988)       Date:  1993-04

9.  Improved doubly robust estimation when data are monotonely coarsened, with application to longitudinal studies with dropout.

Authors:  Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian; Weihua Cao
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Improving efficiency and robustness of the doubly robust estimator for a population mean with incomplete data.

Authors:  Weihua Cao; Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 2.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.