Literature DB >> 11890304

Model-checking techniques based on cumulative residuals.

D Y Lin1, L J Wei, Z Ying.   

Abstract

Residuals have long been used for graphical and numerical examinations of the adequacy of regression models. Conventional residual analysis based on the plots of raw residuals or their smoothed curves is highly subjective, whereas most numerical goodness-of-fit tests provide little information about the nature of model misspecification. In this paper, we develop objective and informative model-checking techniques by taking the cumulative sums of residuals over certain coordinates (e.g., covariates or fitted values) or by considering some related aggregates of residuals, such as moving sums and moving averages. For a variety of statistical models and data structures, including generalized linear models with independent or dependent observations, the distributions of these stochastic processes tinder the assumed model can be approximated by the distributions of certain zero-mean Gaussian processes whose realizations can be easily generated by computer simulation. Each observed process can then be compared, both graphically and numerically, with a number of realizations from the Gaussian process. Such comparisons enable one to assess objectively whether a trend seen in a residual plot reflects model misspecification or natural variation. The proposed techniques are particularly useful in checking the functional form of a covariate and the link function. Illustrations with several medical studies are provided.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11890304     DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2002.00001.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  49 in total

1.  Choline intake and genetic polymorphisms influence choline metabolite concentrations in human breast milk and plasma.

Authors:  Leslie M Fischer; Kerry Ann da Costa; Joseph Galanko; Wei Sha; Brigitte Stephenson; Julie Vick; Steven H Zeisel
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Regression calibration when foods (measured with error) are the variables of interest: markedly non-Gaussian data with many zeroes.

Authors:  Gary E Fraser; Daniel O Stram
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Predictors of Injection Cessation and Relapse among Female Sex Workers who Inject Drugs in Two Mexican-US Border Cities.

Authors:  Brooke S West; Daniela Abramovitz; Hugo Staines; Alicia Vera; Thomas L Patterson; Steffanie A Strathdee
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.671

4.  Integrating the predictiveness of a marker with its performance as a classifier.

Authors:  Margaret S Pepe; Ziding Feng; Ying Huang; Gary Longton; Ross Prentice; Ian M Thompson; Yingye Zheng
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Testing polynomial covariate effects in linear and generalized linear mixed models.

Authors:  Mingyan Huang; Daowen Zhang
Journal:  Stat Surv       Date:  2008-01-01

6.  Types of fish consumed and fish preparation methods in relation to pancreatic cancer incidence: the VITAL Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ka He; Pengcheng Xun; Theodore M Brasky; Marilie D Gammon; June Stevens; Emily White
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Classifying and predicting errors of inpatient medication reconciliation.

Authors:  Jennifer R Pippins; Tejal K Gandhi; Claus Hamann; Chima D Ndumele; Stephanie A Labonville; Ellen K Diedrichsen; Marcy G Carty; Andrew S Karson; Ishir Bhan; Christopher M Coley; Catherine L Liang; Alexander Turchin; Patricia C McCarthy; Jeffrey L Schnipper
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Visual Acuity Change Over 24 Months and Its Association With Foveal Phenotype and Genotype in Individuals With Stargardt Disease: ProgStar Study Report No. 10.

Authors:  Xiangrong Kong; Kaoru Fujinami; Rupert W Strauss; Beatriz Munoz; Sheila K West; Artur V Cideciyan; Michel Michaelides; Mohamed Ahmed; Ann-Margret Ervin; Etienne Schönbach; Janet K Cheetham; Hendrik P N Scholl
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 7.389

9.  Test the reliability of doubly robust estimation with missing response data.

Authors:  Baojiang Chen; Jing Qin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  PERTURBATION AND SCALED COOK'S DISTANCE.

Authors:  Hongtu Zhu; Joseph G Ibrahim; Hyunsoon Cho
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 4.028

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.