Literature DB >> 24570265

How to derive and validate clinical prediction models for use in intensive care medicine.

José Labarère1, Bertrand Renaud, Renaud Bertrand, Michael J Fine.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical prediction models are formal combinations of historical, physical examination and laboratory or radiographic test data elements designed to accurately estimate the probability that a specific illness is present (diagnostic model), will respond to a form of treatment (therapeutic model) or will have a well-defined outcome (prognostic model) in an individual patient. They are derived and validated using empirical data and used to assist physicians in their clinical decision-making that requires a quantitative assessment of diagnostic, therapeutic or prognostic probabilities at the bedside.
PURPOSE: To provide intensivists with a comprehensive overview of the empirical development and testing phases that a clinical prediction model must satisfy before its implementation into clinical practice.
RESULTS: The development of a clinical prediction model encompasses three consecutive phases, namely derivation, (external) validation and impact analysis. The derivation phase consists of building a multivariable model, estimating its apparent predictive performance in terms of both calibration and discrimination, and assessing the potential for statistical over-fitting using internal validation techniques (i.e. split-sampling, cross-validation or bootstrapping). External validation consists of testing the predictive performance of a model by assessing its calibration and discrimination in different but plausibly related patients. Impact analysis involves comparative research [i.e. (cluster) randomized trials] to determine whether clinical use of a prediction model affects physician practices, patient outcomes or the cost of healthcare delivery.
CONCLUSIONS: This narrative review introduces a checklist of 19 items designed to help intensivists develop and transparently report valid clinical prediction models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24570265     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-014-3227-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  56 in total

Review 1.  Methodologic standards for the development of clinical decision rules in emergency medicine.

Authors:  I G Stiell; G A Wells
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.721

2.  Missing covariate data in clinical research: when and when not to use the missing-indicator method for analysis.

Authors:  Rolf H H Groenwold; Ian R White; A Rogier T Donders; James R Carpenter; Douglas G Altman; Karel G M Moons
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Translating clinical research into clinical practice: impact of using prediction rules to make decisions.

Authors:  Brendan M Reilly; Arthur T Evans
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Use of Brier score to assess binary predictions.

Authors:  Kaspar Rufibach
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 5.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Inappropriate use of bivariable analysis to screen risk factors for use in multivariable analysis.

Authors:  G W Sun; T L Shook; G L Kay
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 7.  Clinical prediction rules. A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards.

Authors:  A Laupacis; N Sekar; I G Stiell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-02-12       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Dangers of using "optimal" cutpoints in the evaluation of prognostic factors.

Authors:  D G Altman; B Lausen; W Sauerbrei; M Schumacher
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1994-06-01       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Derivation and validation of a prognostic model for pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Drahomir Aujesky; D Scott Obrosky; Roslyn A Stone; Thomas E Auble; Arnaud Perrier; Jacques Cornuz; Pierre-Marie Roy; Michael J Fine
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 21.405

10.  Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures.

Authors:  Ewout W Steyerberg; Andrew J Vickers; Nancy R Cook; Thomas Gerds; Mithat Gonen; Nancy Obuchowski; Michael J Pencina; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.822

View more
  38 in total

1.  Clinical Risk Factors and Prognostic Model for Primary Graft Dysfunction after Lung Transplantation in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension.

Authors:  Mary K Porteous; James C Lee; David J Lederer; Scott M Palmer; Edward Cantu; Rupal J Shah; Scarlett L Bellamy; Vibha N Lama; Sangeeta M Bhorade; Maria M Crespo; John F McDyer; Keith M Wille; A Russell Localio; Jonathan B Orens; Pali D Shah; Ann B Weinacker; Selim Arcasoy; David S Wilkes; Lorraine B Ware; Jason D Christie; Steven M Kawut; Joshua M Diamond
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2017-10

2.  Clinical prediction rule for delayed hemothorax after minor thoracic injury: a multicentre derivation and validation study.

Authors:  Marcel Émond; Chantal Guimont; Jean-Marc Chauny; Raoul Daoust; Éric Bergeron; Laurent Vanier; Lynne Moore; Miville Plourde; Batomen Kuimi; Valérie Boucher; Nadine Allain-Boulé; Natalie Le Sage
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2017-06-12

Review 3.  A systematic review of the status and methodological considerations for estimating risk of first ever stroke in the general population.

Authors:  Wei Xu; Jiuyi Huang; Qingsong Yu; Hongfan Yu; Yang Pu; Qiuling Shi
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Leveraging Clinical Time-Series Data for Prediction: A Cautionary Tale.

Authors:  Eli Sherman; Hitinder Gurm; Ulysses Balis; Scott Owens; Jenna Wiens
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

5.  What's new with survival prediction models in acute respiratory failure patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Matthieu Schmidt; Alain Combes; David Pilcher
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  -Omic and Electronic Health Record Big Data Analytics for Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Po-Yen Wu; Chih-Wen Cheng; Chanchala D Kaddi; Janani Venugopalan; Ryan Hoffman; May D Wang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Predictors of gastrointestinal bleeding in adult ICU patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anders Granholm; Linan Zeng; Joanna Colleen Dionne; Anders Perner; Søren Marker; Mette Krag; Robert MacLaren; Zhikang Ye; Morten Hylander Møller; Waleed Alhazzani
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Development and validation of the pediatric risk estimate score for children using extracorporeal respiratory support (Ped-RESCUERS).

Authors:  Ryan P Barbaro; Philip S Boonstra; Matthew L Paden; Lloyd A Roberts; Gail M Annich; Robert H Bartlett; Frank W Moler; Matthew M Davis
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Diagnostic accuracy and clinical relevance of an inflammatory biomarker panel for sepsis in adult critically ill patients.

Authors:  Philippe R Bauer; Rahul Kashyap; Stacy C League; John G Park; Darci R Block; Nikola A Baumann; Alicia Algeciras-Schimnich; Sarah M Jenkins; Carin Y Smith; Ognjen Gajic; Roshini S Abraham
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 2.803

10.  COVID-19 versus influenza A/B supeRInfectionS in the IntenSive care unit (CRISIS): Protocol for a Danish nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Vibe S Mikkelsen; Marie Helleberg; Nicolai Haase; Morten H Møller; Anders Granholm; Merete Storgaard; Andreas B Jonsson; Kristian Schønning; Nanna Reiter; Sigurður Þór Sigurðsson; Marianne Voldstedlund; Steffen Christensen; Anders Perner
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 2.274

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.