Literature DB >> 10092723

Methodologic standards for the development of clinical decision rules in emergency medicine.

I G Stiell1, G A Wells.   

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to present a guide to help readers critically appraise the methodologic quality of an article or articles describing a clinical decision rule. This guide will also be useful to clinical researchers who wish to answer 1 or more questions detailed in this article. We consider the 6 major stages in the development and testing of a new clinical decision rule and discuss a number of standards within each stage. We use examples from emergency medicine and, in particular, examples from our own research on clinical decisions rules for radiography in trauma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10092723     DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70309-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  135 in total

1.  Clinical decision rules in the emergency department.

Authors:  I G Stiell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-11-28       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  A new prognostic scoring system for meningococcal septic shock in children: comparison with three other scoring systems.

Authors:  Nathan Kuppermann; Richard Malley; W Charles Huskins
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2002-12-14       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  A prospective cluster-randomized trial to implement the Canadian CT Head Rule in emergency departments.

Authors:  Ian G Stiell; Catherine M Clement; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Robert J Brison; Brian H Rowe; Jacques S Lee; Amit Shah; Jamie Brehaut; Brian R Holroyd; Michael J Schull; R Douglas McKnight; Mary A Eisenhauer; Jonathan Dreyer; Eric Letovsky; Tim Rutledge; Iain Macphail; Scott Ross; Jeffrey J Perry; Urbain Ip; Howard Lesiuk; Carol Bennett; George A Wells
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  A clinical decision rule to predict adult patients with traumatic intracranial haemorrhage who do not require intensive care unit admission.

Authors:  Daniel K Nishijima; Kiarash Shahlaie; Angela Echeverri; James F Holmes
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Derivation of decision rules to predict clinically important outcomes in acute flank pain patients.

Authors:  Ralph C Wang; Robert M Rodriguez; Jahan Fahimi; M Kennedy Hall; Stephen Shiboski; Tom Chi; Rebecca Smith-Bindman
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-12-11       Impact factor: 2.469

6.  How do clinical features help identify paediatric patients with fractures following blunt wrist trauma?

Authors:  A P Webster; S Goodacre; D Walker; D Burke
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Clinical prediction rule for delayed hemothorax after minor thoracic injury: a multicentre derivation and validation study.

Authors:  Marcel Émond; Chantal Guimont; Jean-Marc Chauny; Raoul Daoust; Éric Bergeron; Laurent Vanier; Lynne Moore; Miville Plourde; Batomen Kuimi; Valérie Boucher; Nadine Allain-Boulé; Natalie Le Sage
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2017-06-12

8.  A comparison of the clinical manifestation and pathophysiology of myofascial pain syndrome and fibromyalgia: implications for differential diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Sheryl Bourgaize; Genevieve Newton; Dinesh Kumbhare; John Srbely
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2018-04

9.  Performance of the CURB-65 Score in Predicting Critical Care Interventions in Patients Admitted With Community-Acquired Pneumonia.

Authors:  Annette Ilg; Ari Moskowitz; Varun Konanki; Parth V Patel; Maureen Chase; Anne V Grossestreuer; Michael W Donnino
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 10.  Selective testing strategies for diagnosing group A streptococcal infection in children with pharyngitis: a systematic review and prospective multicentre external validation study.

Authors:  Jérémie F Cohen; Robert Cohen; Corinne Levy; Franck Thollot; Mohamed Benani; Philippe Bidet; Martin Chalumeau
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.