| Literature DB >> 31722701 |
Beata Szczepanowska-Wolowiec1,2, Paulina Sztandera1, Ireneusz Kotela1,3, Marek Zak4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Children and young people make up an age group most vulnerable to falls. Various stability disorders may become instrumental in sustaining more frequent falls and resultant fractures. Correct morphological structure impacts overall efficiency of the foot, as well as offers significant diagnostic potential. Even minor foot disorders may affect the entire bio kinematic chain, also impacting the foot's motility. Structural alterations within a foot may also impair balance in the standing position, and contribute to more frequent injuries. The study aimed to assess the relationship between feet deformities and postural stability deficits in schoolchildren prone to sustain accidental falls.Entities:
Keywords: Balance; Children; Feet deformities; Postural stability; Public health
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31722701 PMCID: PMC6854669 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2923-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Basic characteristics of the study group
| Variable | Boys ( | Girls ( | Z | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body mass [kg] | 47.56 ± 11.99 | 44.92 ± 11.46 | − 1.285 | 0.199 |
| Height [cm] | 154 ± 0.12 | 153 ± 0.11 | −0.35 | 0.727 |
| BMI | 19.78 ± 3.28 | 18.91 ± 3.22 | −1.853 | 0.064 |
Mean-arithmetic mean, SD-standard deviation, Z- statistical values of the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test for two independent samples, BMI- body mass index, p-significance level
Fig. 1PodoScan 2D. Source: own research materials
Fig. 2The method of determining the foot indicators under study. a-b-length of the foot, mtt-mtf-width of the foot, c-Clarke’s angle, α-hallux valgus angle, β- angle of deformity of the fifth toe. Source: own research materials
Fig. 3Examples of surface area and COP path charts. Source: own research materials. An sample of the study charts is comprised in Fig. 3. - length of sway: determines the length of the COP trajectory in mm – COP length. - surface: surface area of the COP sway in mm² - COP field area. - mean X: mean value in mm of the COP trajectory in the X-axis - COP X mean. - mean Y: mean value in mm of the COP trajectory in the Y-axis - COP Y mean. - X axis: the range of COP movement in the X axis in mm in the mid-lateral direction of ML - COP X. - Y axis: the range of COP movement in the Y axis in mm in the antero-posterior direction AP - COP Y
Statistically significant morphological variables of the feet within the study group, stratified by gender
| Variables | Boys | Girls | Z | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |||
| Length - L foot | 238.15 | 17.85 | 229.53 | 14.04 | −3.094 | 0.002 |
| Length - R foot | 237.81 | 17.48 | 229.41 | 14.1 | −3.118 | 0.002 |
| Width - L foot | 88.77 | 6.34 | 85.47 | 6.35 | −3.399 | 0.001 |
| Width - R foot | 89.12 | 6.35 | 85.9 | 6.59 | −3.128 | 0.002 |
| Hallux valgus angle (α) P | 4.16 | 3.48 | 6.12 | 4.1 | 3.642 | < 0.001 |
Mean-arithmetic mean, SD-standard deviation, Z- statistical values of the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test for two independent samples, p-level of significance, L-left, R-right
Correlations between the structural characteristics of the feet and the stability indicators within the entire study group
| Variable | COP length | COP Surface area | COP Y | COP X |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length L foot | ρ = −0.126 | |||
| Length R foot | ||||
| Width L foot | ρ = − 0.301 | |||
| Width R foot | ρ = − 0.288 | |||
| Clarke’s angle R | ||||
| Wejsflog index L | ||||
| Wejsflog index R | ||||
| Hallux valgus angle α L | ||||
| Hallux valgus angle α R | ||||
| The fifth toe angle β L | ||||
| The fifth toe angle β R |
ρ- Spearman’s rank correlation
Relationships between postural stability and gender
| Variable | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boys | Girls | Boys | Girls | ||||
| COP length | 710.54 | 730.78 | 245.63 | 236.05 | 0.47 | 720.76 | 240.44 |
| COP surface area | 227.86 | 105.05 | 799.85 | 193.36 | 0.029 | 165.84 | 581.07 |
| Mean X | −4.52 | −2.62 | 6.96 | 5.59 | 0.063 | −3.56 | 6.36 |
| Mean Y | −16.63 | −15.56 | 9.64 | 8.73 | 0.265 | −16.09 | 9.18 |
| COP Y | 15.17 | 11.18 | 26.79 | 8.8 | 0.062 | 13.16 | 19.91 |
| COP X | 10.97 | 8.64 | 7.62 | 5.1 | 0.023 | 9.79 | 6.56 |
Statistically significant stepwise regression models
| Gender | Dependent variable | Predictor | F | R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Girls | COP-log length | Wejsflog index L | 12.14 | 0.001 | 0.109 |
| COP-log Surface area | Width L foot | 7.55 | 0.007 | 0.071 | |
| X Mean | Clarke’s angle L | 6.94 | 0.010 | 0.066 | |
| Y Mean | Hallux valgus angle L | 6.97 | 0.010 | 0.066 | |
| COP Y-log | Width L foot | 6.98 | 0.010 | 0.110 | |
| Hallux valgus angle R | 5.11 | 0.026 | |||
| COP X-log | Width L foot | 7.40 | 0.008 | 0.070 | |
| Boys | COP-log length | Wejsflog index R | 16.51 | < 0.001 | 0.234 |
| Width L foot | 8.15 | 0.005 | |||
| Clarke’s angle R | 4.34 | 0.040 | |||
| COP-log surface area | Width P foot | 4.93 | 0.029 | 0.105 | |
| Clarke’s angle R | 6.36 | 0.013 | |||
| X mean | Clarke’s angle L | 4.88 | 0.030 | 0.048 | |
| Y mean | Width R foot | 9.62 | 0.003 | 0.196 | |
| COP Y-log | Width R foot | 5.77 | 0.018 | 0.118 | |
| Clarke’s angle R | 7.04 | 0.009 |
F- statistical values, Fisher-Snedecor test, R2 - determination coefficient, log - logarithm of the variable