Literature DB >> 2456802

Comparison of monoclonal antibodies for the detection of occult breast carcinoma metastases in bone marrow.

A Thor1, M J Viglione, N Ohuchi, J Simpson, R Steis, J Cousar, M Lippman, D W Kufe, J Schlom.   

Abstract

Twenty percent (n = 6) of Stage III or IV breast cancer patients (n = 30) had bone marrow metastases detected in bilateral bone marrow biopsy/aspiration preparations using standard histologic preparations. Each metastasis was also detected by four separate monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) which recognize breast carcinoma associated antigens (DF3, anti-EMA, HMFG-2, and CAM5.2). These MAbs were then utilized to stain other bone marrow preparations (n = 81) to determine their utility for the detection of micrometastatic breast carcinoma. MAbs HMFG-2, anti-EMA, and DF3 were each strongly reactive with bone marrows containing histologically-evident metastatic breast carcinoma (18/18). These anti-epithelial membrane antigen MAbs, however, were also reactive with rare plasma cells and immature cells (as well as cell clusters) in some of the control bone marrow samples tested, including those from normal patients and patients with hematologic disorders. They also reacted with some of the preparations from patients with leukemia and lymphoma, and with uninvolved marrows from patients with non-epithelial malignancies. The anti-keratin MAb CAM5.2, in contrast, reacted with 83% (15/18) breast cancer metastases and failed to stain any cells in the various categories of control marrow preparations. These data suggested that MAb CAM5.2 might be utilized to immunohistochemically differentiate micrometastatic breast carcinoma from immature myeloid or erythroid elements. Each MAb was then reacted with histologically uninvolved marrow preparations from the remaining 24 of 30 breast cancer patients in an attempt to identify occult breast carcinoma metastases. While MAbs HMFG-2, DF3, and anti-EMA demonstrated reactive cells in some of these marrows, this reactivity was similar to that seen with control preparations. MAb CAM5.2, in contrast, was negative with all specimens. These data suggest that MAb CAM5.2 may be a useful immunologic probe for the detection and confirmation of metastatic breast carcinoma in bone marrow, while more caution must be employed in the interpretation of results obtained using MAbs anti-EMA, DF3, and HMFG-2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2456802     DOI: 10.1007/bf01805837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  30 in total

1.  A new antigen on the epithelial membrane: its immunoperoxidase localisation in normal and neoplastic tissue.

Authors:  E Heyderman; K Steele; M G Ormerod
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  The NIH Consensus Development Conference on Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer--a commentary.

Authors:  M E Lippman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Use of avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) in immunoperoxidase techniques: a comparison between ABC and unlabeled antibody (PAP) procedures.

Authors:  S M Hsu; L Raine; H Fanger
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 2.479

4.  Nonspecific staining of mast cells by avidin-biotin-peroxidase complexes (ABC).

Authors:  G Bussolati; P Gugliotta
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.479

5.  Complexity of expression of antigenic determinants, recognized by monoclonal antibodies HMFG-1 and HMFG-2, in normal and malignant human mammary epithelial cells.

Authors:  J Burchell; H Durbin; J Taylor-Papadimitriou
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  Purification and characterization of a high molecular weight glycoprotein detectable in human milk and breast carcinomas.

Authors:  H Sekine; T Ohno; D W Kufe
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 5.422

7.  Monoclonal antibody DF3 correlates with tumor differentiation and hormone receptor status in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  J Lundy; A Thor; R Maenza; J Schlom; F Forouhar; M Testa; D Kufe
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  An assessment of the value of epithelial membrane antigen and other epithelial markers in solving diagnostic problems in tumour histopathology.

Authors:  J P Sloane; F Hughes; M G Ormerod
Journal:  Histochem J       Date:  1983-07

9.  Increased detection of mammary carcinoma cells in marrow smears using antisera to epithelial membrane antigen.

Authors:  D P Dearnaley; J P Sloane; M G Ormerod; K Steele; R C Coombes; H M Clink; T J Powles; H T Ford; J C Gazet; A M Neville
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Detection of isolated mammary carcinoma cells in marrow of patients with primary breast cancer.

Authors:  D P Dearnaley; M G Ormerod; J P Sloane; H Lumley; S Imrie; M Jones; R C Coombes; A M Neville
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 18.000

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Biological response modifiers in the management of patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  D L Longo; L C Hartmann
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Critical evaluation of monoclonal antibody staining in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  D M Parham; G Coghill; A J Robertson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Non-specifically labelled cells that simulate bone marrow metastases in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  M Lagrange; J M Ferrero; J L Lagrange; J C Machiavello; J Monticelli; C Bayle; A Creisson; M Namer; A Thyss; C Bourcier; J Gioanni; M Schneider
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Cytokeratin-positive cells in the bone marrow of breast cancer patients and noncancer donors.

Authors:  David N Krag; Roberto Kusminsky; Edward Manna; Donald Weaver; Seth P Harlow; Michael Covelli; Mary A Stanley; Laurence McCahill; Frank Ittleman; Bruce Leavitt; Martin Krag; Patricia Amarante
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2009-10

5.  Tumour cell detection in the bone marrow of breast cancer patients at primary therapy: results of a 3-year median follow-up.

Authors:  N Harbeck; M Untch; L Pache; W Eiermann
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 7.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.