Literature DB >> 24562873

Are patients satisfied with a web-based followup after total joint arthroplasty?

Jacquelyn Marsh1, Dianne Bryant, Steven J MacDonald, Douglas Naudie, Alliya Remtulla, Richard McCalden, James Howard, Robert Bourne, James McAuley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A web-based followup assessment may be a feasible, cost-saving alternative of tracking patient outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. However, before implementing a web-based program, it is important to determine patient satisfaction levels with the new followup method. Satisfaction with the care received is becoming an increasingly important metric, and we do not know to what degree patients are satisfied with an approach to followup that does not involve an in-person visit with their surgeons. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined (1) patient satisfaction and (2) patients' preferences for followup method (web-based or in-person) after total joint arthroplasty.
METHODS: We randomized patients who were at least 12 months after primary THA or TKA to complete a web-based followup or to have their appointment at the clinic. There were 410 eligible patients contacted for the study during the recruitment period. Of these, 256 agreed to participate, and a total of 229 patients completed the study (89% of those enrolled, 56% of those potentially eligible; 111 in the usual-care group, 118 in the web-based group). Their mean age was 69 years (range, 38-86 years). There was no crossover between groups. All 229 patients completed a satisfaction questionnaire at the time of their followup appointments. Patients in the web-based group also completed a satisfaction and preference questionnaire 1 year later. Only patients from the web-based group were asked to indicate preference as they had experienced the web-based and in-person followup methods. We used descriptive statistics to summarize the satisfaction questionnaires and compared results using Pearson's chi-square test.
RESULTS: Ninety-one patients (82.0%) in the usual-care group indicated that they were either extremely or very satisfied with the followup process compared with 90 patients (75.6%) who were in the web-based group (p < 0.01; odds ratio [OR] = 3.95; 95% CI, 1.79-8.76). Similarly, patients in the usual care group were more satisfied with the care they received from their surgeon, compared with patients in the web-based group (92.8% versus 73.9%; p < 0.01, OR = 1.37; 95% CI, 0.73-2.57). Forty-four percent of patients preferred the web-based method, 36% preferred the usual method, and 16% had no preference (p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results show moderate to high satisfaction levels with a web-based followup assessment. Patients who completed the usual method of in-person followup assessment reported greater satisfaction; however, the difference was small and may not outweigh the additional cost and time-saving benefits of the web-based followup method. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24562873      PMCID: PMC4016458          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3514-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  19 in total

1.  Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences.

Authors:  C C Preston; A M Colman
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2000-03

Review 2.  Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine.

Authors:  F Mair; P Whitten
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-03

3.  The feasibility of telemedicine for orthopaedic outpatient clinics--a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  K Haukipuro; A Ohinmaa; I Winblad; T Linden; S Vuolio
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 6.184

4.  An electronic clinic for arthroplasty follow-up: a pilot study.

Authors:  Gavin Wood; Douglas Naudie; Steve MacDonald; Richard McCalden; Robert Bourne
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  A guide to direct measures of patient satisfaction in clinical practice. Health Services Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Assessment of medical care by elderly people: general satisfaction and physician quality.

Authors:  Y Lee; J D Kasper
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 7.  Skype: a tool for functional assessment in orthopaedic research.

Authors:  Daniel W Good; Darren F Lui; Michael Leonard; Seamus Morris; John P McElwain
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 6.184

8.  Patients respond similarly to paper and electronic versions of the WOMAC and SF-12 following total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jacquelyn D Marsh; Dianne M Bryant; Steven J Macdonald; Douglas D R Naudie
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Multicentre randomised control trial comparing real time teledermatology with conventional outpatient dermatological care: societal cost-benefit analysis.

Authors:  R Wootton; S E Bloomer; R Corbett; D J Eedy; N Hicks; H E Lotery; C Mathews; J Paisley; K Steele; M A Loane
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-06

10.  Patient satisfaction with emergency department triage nursing care: a multicenter study.

Authors:  J Raper; B A Davis; L Scott
Journal:  J Nurs Care Qual       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.597

View more
  17 in total

1.  Examination of the Patient-Focused Impact of Cancer Telegenetics Among a Rural Population: Comparison with Traditional In-Person Services.

Authors:  Nan M Solomons; Amanda E Lamb; Frances L Lucas; Eileen F McDonald; Susan Miesfeldt
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.536

2.  T-box transcription regulator Tbr2 is essential for the formation and maintenance of Opn4/melanopsin-expressing intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Chai-An Mao; Hongyan Li; Zhijing Zhang; Takae Kiyama; Satchidananda Panda; Samer Hattar; Christophe P Ribelayga; Stephen L Mills; Steven W Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Telehealth Visits After Shoulder Surgery: Higher Patient Satisfaction and Lower Costs.

Authors:  Evan A O'Donnell; Jillian E Haberli; Andres Muniz Martinez; Daniel Yagoda; Robert S Kaplan; Jon J P Warner
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2022-07-06

4.  An Overview of Telehealth in Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Eric N Windsor; Abhinav K Sharma; Ioannis Gkiatas; Ameer M Elbuluk; Peter K Sculco; Jonathan M Vigdorchik
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2021-02-21

5.  CORR Insights®: What is the Likelihood of Subsequent Arthroplasties after Primary TKA or THA? Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Rémy S Nizard
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  CORR Insights®: How Satisfied Are Patients and Surgeons with Telemedicine in Orthopaedic Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mansur Halai
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.755

7.  Who is More Likely to Use the Internet for Health Behavior Change? A Cross-Sectional Survey of Internet Use Among Smokers and Nonsmokers Who Are Orthopedic Trauma Patients.

Authors:  Sam McCrabb; Amanda L Baker; John Attia; Zsolt J Balogh; Natalie Lott; Kerrin Palazzi; Justine Naylor; Ian A Harris; Christopher Doran; Johnson George; Luke Wolfenden; Eliza Skelton; Billie Bonevski
Journal:  JMIR Ment Health       Date:  2017-05-30

8.  Cost-Effective Mobile-Based Healthcare System for Managing Total Joint Arthroplasty Follow-Up.

Authors:  Marina Bitsaki; George Koutras; Hansjoerg Heep; Christos Koutras
Journal:  Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2017-01-31

9.  Telehealth for Upper Extremity Conditions: Perceptions of the Patient and Provider.

Authors:  Brian M Katt; Casey Imbergamo; Daniel Fletcher; Daren Aita; Michael Nakashian; Moody Kwok; Pedro K Beredjiklian
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2020-09

10.  One-Stage Arthroplasty or Revision for Seronegative Infections in Hip and Knee.

Authors:  Hao-Yang Wang; Rui Zhang Md; Ze-Yu Luo; Duan Wang Md PhD; Fu-Xing Pei; Xin Tang; Zong-Ke Zhou
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 2.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.