F Mair1, P Whitten. 1. Department of Primary Care, Whelan Building, Quadrangle, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GB. f.s.mair@liv.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review research into patient satisfaction with teleconsultation, specifically clinical consultations between healthcare providers and patients involving real time interactive video. DESIGN: Systematic review of telemedicine satisfaction studies. Electronic databases searched include Medline, Embase, Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, Arts and Humanities Citation Index, and the TIE (Telemedicine Information Exchange) database. SUBJECTS: Studies conducted worldwide and published between 1966 and 1998. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quality of evidence about patient satisfaction. RESULTS: 32 studies were identified. Study methods used were simple survey instruments (26 studies), exact methods not specified (5), and qualitative methods (1). Study designs were randomised controlled trial (1 trial); random patient selection (2); case-control (1); and selection criteria not specified or participants represented consecutive referrals, convenience samples, or volunteers (28). Sample sizes were </=20 (10 trials), </=100 (14), >100 (7), and not specified (1). All studies reported good levels of patient satisfaction. Qualitative analysis revealed methodological problems with all the published work. Even so, important issues were highlighted that merit further investigation. There is a paucity of data examining patients' perceptions or the effects of this mode of healthcare delivery on the interaction between providers and clients. CONCLUSIONS: Methodological deficiencies (low sample sizes, context, and study designs) of the published research limit the generalisability of the findings. The studies suggest that teleconsultation is acceptable to patients in a variety of circumstances, but issues relating to patient satisfaction require further exploration from the perspective of both clients and providers.
OBJECTIVE: To review research into patient satisfaction with teleconsultation, specifically clinical consultations between healthcare providers and patients involving real time interactive video. DESIGN: Systematic review of telemedicine satisfaction studies. Electronic databases searched include Medline, Embase, Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, Arts and Humanities Citation Index, and the TIE (Telemedicine Information Exchange) database. SUBJECTS: Studies conducted worldwide and published between 1966 and 1998. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quality of evidence about patient satisfaction. RESULTS: 32 studies were identified. Study methods used were simple survey instruments (26 studies), exact methods not specified (5), and qualitative methods (1). Study designs were randomised controlled trial (1 trial); random patient selection (2); case-control (1); and selection criteria not specified or participants represented consecutive referrals, convenience samples, or volunteers (28). Sample sizes were </=20 (10 trials), </=100 (14), >100 (7), and not specified (1). All studies reported good levels of patient satisfaction. Qualitative analysis revealed methodological problems with all the published work. Even so, important issues were highlighted that merit further investigation. There is a paucity of data examining patients' perceptions or the effects of this mode of healthcare delivery on the interaction between providers and clients. CONCLUSIONS: Methodological deficiencies (low sample sizes, context, and study designs) of the published research limit the generalisability of the findings. The studies suggest that teleconsultation is acceptable to patients in a variety of circumstances, but issues relating to patient satisfaction require further exploration from the perspective of both clients and providers.
Authors: Troy W Ertelt; Ross D Crosby; Joanna M Marino; James E Mitchell; Kathy Lancaster; Scott J Crow Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2010-11-15 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Carl May; Robert Harrison; Tracy Finch; Anne MacFarlane; Frances Mair; Paul Wallace Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2003-08-04 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Stanley M Finkelstein; Kathleen MacMahon; Bruce R Lindgren; William N Robiner; Ruth Lindquist; Arin VanWormer; Marshall I Hertz Journal: J Telemed Telecare Date: 2011-11-08 Impact factor: 6.184
Authors: Michael F Chiang; Jeremy D Keenan; Yunling E Du; William Schiff; Gaetano Barile; Joan Li; Ditte J Hess; Rose Anne Johnson; John T Flynn; Justin Starren Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2005