Literature DB >> 22483675

The PET-boost randomised phase II dose-escalation trial in non-small cell lung cancer.

Wouter van Elmpt1, Dirk De Ruysscher, Anke van der Salm, Annemarie Lakeman, Judith van der Stoep, Daisy Emans, Eugène Damen, Michel Öllers, Jan-Jakob Sonke, José Belderbos.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The local site of relapse in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is primarily located in the high FDG uptake region of the primary tumour prior to treatment. A phase II PET-boost trial (NCT01024829) randomises patients between dose-escalation of the entire primary tumour (arm A) or to the high FDG uptake region inside the primary tumour (>50% SUV(max)) (arm B), whilst giving 66 Gy in 24 fractions to involved lymph nodes. We analysed the planning results of the first 20 patients for which both arms A and B were planned.
METHODS: Boost dose levels were escalated up to predefined normal tissue constraints with an equal mean lung dose in both arms. This also forces an equal mean PTV dose in both arms, hence testing pure dose-redistribution. Actual delivered treatment plans from the ongoing clinical trial were analysed. Patients were randomised between arms A and B if dose-escalation to the primary tumour in arm A of at least 72 Gy in 24 fractions could be safely planned.
RESULTS: 15/20 patients could be escalated to at least 72 Gy. Average prescribed fraction dose was 3.27±0.31 Gy [3.01-4.28 Gy] and 3.63±0.54 Gy [3.20-5.40 Gy] for arms A and B, respectively. Average mean total dose inside the PTV of the primary tumour was comparable: 77.3±7.9 Gy vs. 77.5±10.1 Gy. For the boost region dose levels of on average 86.9±14.9 Gy were reached. No significant dose differences between both arms were observed for the organs at risk. Most frequent observed dose-limiting constraints were the mediastinal structures (13/15 and 14/15 for arms A and B, respectively), and the brachial plexus (3/15 for both arms).
CONCLUSION: Dose-escalation using an integrated boost could be achieved to the primary tumour or high FDG uptake regions whilst keeping the pre-defined dose constraints.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22483675     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  60 in total

Review 1.  Individualized radiotherapy by combining high-end irradiation and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Stephanie E Combs; Fridtjof Nüsslin; Jan J Wilkens
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 2.  Imaging techniques for tumour delineation and heterogeneity quantification of lung cancer: overview of current possibilities.

Authors:  Wouter van Elmpt; Catharina M L Zegers; Marco Das; Dirk De Ruysscher
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  A teaching intervention in a contouring dummy run improved target volume delineation in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Reducing the interobserver variability in multicentre clinical studies.

Authors:  Tanja Schimek-Jasch; Esther G C Troost; Gerta Rücker; Vesna Prokic; Melanie Avlar; Viola Duncker-Rohr; Michael Mix; Christian Doll; Anca-Ligia Grosu; Ursula Nestle
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Differential hepatic avoidance radiation therapy: Proof of concept in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Stephen R Bowen; Jatinder Saini; Tobias R Chapman; Robert S Miyaoka; Paul E Kinahan; George A Sandison; Tony Wong; Hubert J Vesselle; Matthew J Nyflot; Smith Apisarnthanarax
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance imaging in precision radiation therapy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Hannah Bainbridge; Ahmed Salem; Rob H N Tijssen; Michael Dubec; Andreas Wetscherek; Corinne Van Es; Jose Belderbos; Corinne Faivre-Finn; Fiona McDonald
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2017-12

Review 6.  Anatomic, functional and molecular imaging in lung cancer precision radiation therapy: treatment response assessment and radiation therapy personalization.

Authors:  Michael MacManus; Sarah Everitt; Tanja Schimek-Jasch; X Allen Li; Ursula Nestle; Feng-Ming Spring Kong
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2017-12

7.  Repeatability of FDG PET/CT metrics assessed in free breathing and deep inspiration breath hold in lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Lotte Nygård; Marianne C Aznar; Barbara M Fischer; Gitte F Persson; Charlotte B Christensen; Flemming L Andersen; Mirjana Josipovic; Seppo W Langer; Andreas Kjær; Ivan R Vogelius; Søren M Bentzen
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-04-25

8.  Characterization of tumor heterogeneity using dynamic contrast enhanced CT and FDG-PET in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  P Veit-Haibach; D De Ruysscher; W van Elmpt; M Das; Martin Hüllner; H Sharifi; K Zegers; B Reymen; P Lambin; J E Wildberger; E G C Troost
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 9.  PET in the management of locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC.

Authors:  Willem Grootjans; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Esther G C Troost; Eric P Visser; Wim J G Oyen; Johan Bussink
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 10.  Magnetic resonance image guided brachytherapy.

Authors:  Kari Tanderup; Akila N Viswanathan; Christian Kirisits; Steven J Frank
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.