Literature DB >> 24561366

Evaluation of plate-related complications and efficacy in fibula free flap mandibular reconstruction.

Emanuele Zavattero1, Massimo Fasolis, Paolo Garzino-Demo, Sid Berrone, Guglielmo A Ramieri.   

Abstract

AIM: The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence of plate-related complications after vascularized bony reconstruction of the mandible, comparing the plate type used. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2004 and December 2012, a total of 41 free osteocutaneous fibula flaps have been used in an equal number of patients for reconstruction of the mandible, at the Division of Maxillofacial surgery, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin. Malignant pathology was the most common indication for segmental mandibulectomy.Patient outcomes were retrospectively evaluated with special attention to plate complications such as plate fracture, exposure, infection, and bony nonunion.The types of reconstruction plates used were mandible plates 2.0, locking plates 2.0, miniplates (<2.0), and locking 2.4 plates.
RESULTS: Mandible plates 2.0 were used in 14 patients, locking plates 2.0 in 12 patients, and locking 2.4 plates in 4 patients. The most commonly used plates were miniplates, which were used in 86 patients.A total of 5 plate complications occurred after 41 procedures in an equal number of patients.Two complications occurred in patients receiving 2.0 mandible plates (2/14). One complication occurred in patients receiving 2.0 locking plates (1/12). Two complications occurred in patients receiving miniplates (2/86).
CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, miniplates are not associated to a high rate of complications comparing to other plates. The advantage of these plates and the low rate of complications make them our first choice for mandibular reconstructions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24561366     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  6 in total

1.  Osseous Union after Mandible Reconstruction with Fibula Free Flap Using Manually Bent Plates vs. Patient-Specific Implants: A Retrospective Analysis of 89 Patients.

Authors:  Michael Knitschke; Sophia Sonnabend; Fritz Christian Roller; Jörn Pons-Kühnemann; Daniel Schmermund; Sameh Attia; Philipp Streckbein; Hans-Peter Howaldt; Sebastian Böttger
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Design of a customised bridging mandibular prosthesis for complex reconstruction: a pilot study.

Authors:  A Tarsitano; S Battaglia; A Sandi; C Marchetti
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.124

3.  Improving mandibular reconstruction by using topology optimization, patient specific design and additive manufacturing?-A biomechanical comparison against miniplates on human specimen.

Authors:  Jan J Lang; Mirjam Bastian; Peter Foehr; Michael Seebach; Jochen Weitz; Constantin von Deimling; Benedikt J Schwaiger; Carina M Micheler; Nikolas J Wilhelm; Christian U Grosse; Marco Kesting; Rainer Burgkart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Surgical site infections following oral cavity cancer resection and reconstruction is a risk factor for plate exposure.

Authors:  Christopher M Yao; Hedyeh Ziai; Gordon Tsang; Andrea Copeland; Dale Brown; Jonathan C Irish; Ralph W Gilbert; David P Goldstein; Patrick J Gullane; John R de Almeida
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-04-08

Review 5.  Complication of osteo reconstruction by utilizing free vascularized fibular bone graft.

Authors:  Qifeng Ou; Panfeng Wu; Zhengbing Zhou; Ding Pan; Ju-Yu Tang
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Retrospective analysis of complications in 190 mandibular resections and simultaneous reconstructions with free fibula flap, iliac crest flap or reconstruction plate: a comparative single centre study.

Authors:  Lucas M Ritschl; Thomas Mücke; Diandra Hart; Tobias Unterhuber; Victoria Kehl; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff; Andreas M Fichter
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.573

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.