Literature DB >> 24559990

CENP-A arrays are more condensed than canonical arrays at low ionic strength.

Christian P Geiss1, Dimitra Keramisanou1, Nikolina Sekulic2, Margot P Scheffer1, Ben E Black2, Achilleas S Frangakis3.   

Abstract

The centromeric histone H3 variant centromeric protein A (CENP-A), whose sequence is the least conserved among all histone variants, is responsible for specifying the location of the centromere. Here, we present a comprehensive study of CENP-A nucleosome arrays by cryo-electron tomography. We see that CENP-A arrays have different biophysical properties than canonical ones under low ionic conditions, as they are more condensed with a 20% smaller average nearest-neighbor distance and a 30% higher nucleosome density. We find that CENP-A nucleosomes have a predominantly crossed DNA entry/exit site that is narrowed on average by 8°, and they have a propensity to stack face to face. We therefore propose that CENP-A induces geometric constraints at the nucleosome DNA entry/exit site to bring neighboring nucleosomes into close proximity. This specific property of CENP-A may be responsible for generating a fundamental process that contributes to increased chromatin fiber compaction that is propagated under physiological conditions to form centromeric chromatin.
Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24559990      PMCID: PMC3944588          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  36 in total

Review 1.  The centromere paradox: stable inheritance with rapidly evolving DNA.

Authors:  S Henikoff; K Ahmad; H S Malik
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-08-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Centromeres and kinetochores: from epigenetics to mitotic checkpoint signaling.

Authors:  Don W Cleveland; Yinghui Mao; Kevin F Sullivan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2003-02-21       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Reconstitution of nucleosome core particles from recombinant histones and DNA.

Authors:  Pamela N Dyer; Raji S Edayathumangalam; Cindy L White; Yunhe Bao; Srinivas Chakravarthy; Uma M Muthurajan; Karolin Luger
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.600

4.  Linker histone tails and N-tails of histone H3 are redundant: scanning force microscopy studies of reconstituted fibers.

Authors:  S H Leuba; C Bustamante; K van Holde; J Zlatanova
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  New DNA sequence rules for high affinity binding to histone octamer and sequence-directed nucleosome positioning.

Authors:  P T Lowary; J Widom
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1998-02-13       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Reversible oligonucleosome self-association: dependence on divalent cations and core histone tail domains.

Authors:  P M Schwarz; A Felthauser; T M Fletcher; J C Hansen
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1996-04-02       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Conserved organization of centromeric chromatin in flies and humans.

Authors:  Michael D Blower; Beth A Sullivan; Gary H Karpen
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 12.270

8.  Structural determinants for generating centromeric chromatin.

Authors:  Ben E Black; Daniel R Foltz; Srinivas Chakravarthy; Karolin Luger; Virgil L Woods; Don W Cleveland
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Story in a sample-the potential (and limitations) of cryo-electron microscopy applied to molecular machines.

Authors:  Joachim Frank
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.505

10.  Chromatin conformation and salt-induced compaction: three-dimensional structural information from cryoelectron microscopy.

Authors:  J Bednar; R A Horowitz; J Dubochet; C L Woodcock
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  The molecular basis for centromere identity and function.

Authors:  Kara L McKinley; Iain M Cheeseman
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  A cell-free CENP-A assembly system defines the chromatin requirements for centromere maintenance.

Authors:  Frederick G Westhorpe; Colin J Fuller; Aaron F Straight
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 10.539

3.  Structural transitions of centromeric chromatin regulate the cell cycle-dependent recruitment of CENP-N.

Authors:  Junnan Fang; Yuting Liu; Yun Wei; Wenqiang Deng; Zhouliang Yu; Li Huang; Yan Teng; Ting Yao; Qinglong You; Haihe Ruan; Ping Chen; Rui-Ming Xu; Guohong Li
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Epigenetic origin of evolutionary novel centromeres.

Authors:  Doron Tolomeo; Oronzo Capozzi; Roscoe R Stanyon; Nicoletta Archidiacono; Pietro D'Addabbo; Claudia R Catacchio; Stefania Purgato; Giovanni Perini; Werner Schempp; John Huddleston; Maika Malig; Evan E Eichler; Mariano Rocchi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  CENP-A and topoisomerase-II antagonistically affect chromosome length.

Authors:  A-M Ladouceur; Rajesh Ranjan; Lydia Smith; Tanner Fadero; Jennifer Heppert; Bob Goldstein; Amy Shaub Maddox; Paul S Maddox
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 10.539

6.  Internal modifications in the CENP-A nucleosome modulate centromeric dynamics.

Authors:  Minh Bui; Mary Pitman; Arthur Nuccio; Serene Roque; Paul Gregory Donlin-Asp; Aleksandra Nita-Lazar; Garegin A Papoian; Yamini Dalal
Journal:  Epigenetics Chromatin       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 4.954

7.  CENP-A nucleosome-a chromatin-embedded pedestal for the centromere: lessons learned from structural biology.

Authors:  Ahmad Ali-Ahmad; Nikolina Sekulić
Journal:  Essays Biochem       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 8.000

8.  Natural chromatin is heterogeneous and self-associates in vitro.

Authors:  Shujun Cai; Yajiao Song; Chen Chen; Jian Shi; Lu Gan
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 4.138

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.