Literature DB >> 24554578

On the quasi-steady aerodynamics of normal hovering flight part II: model implementation and evaluation.

Mostafa R A Nabawy1, William J Crowther.   

Abstract

This paper introduces a generic, transparent and compact model for the evaluation of the aerodynamic performance of insect-like flapping wings in hovering flight. The model is generic in that it can be applied to wings of arbitrary morphology and kinematics without the use of experimental data, is transparent in that the aerodynamic components of the model are linked directly to morphology and kinematics via physical relationships and is compact in the sense that it can be efficiently evaluated for use within a design optimization environment. An important aspect of the model is the method by which translational force coefficients for the aerodynamic model are obtained from first principles; however important insights are also provided for the morphological and kinematic treatments that improve the clarity and efficiency of the overall model. A thorough analysis of the leading-edge suction analogy model is provided and comparison of the aerodynamic model with results from application of the leading-edge suction analogy shows good agreement. The full model is evaluated against experimental data for revolving wings and good agreement is obtained for lift and drag up to 90° incidence. Comparison of the model output with data from computational fluid dynamics studies on a range of different insect species also shows good agreement with predicted weight support ratio and specific power. The validated model is used to evaluate the relative impact of different contributors to the induced power factor for the hoverfly and fruitfly. It is shown that the assumption of an ideal induced power factor (k = 1) for a normal hovering hoverfly leads to a 23% overestimation of the generated force owing to flapping.

Keywords:  flapping wings; hovering; optimum kinematics; quasi-steady aerodynamics

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24554578      PMCID: PMC3973364          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2013.1197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  19 in total

1.  Mechanical performance of aquatic rowing and flying.

Authors:  J A Walker; M W Westneat
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Spanwise flow and the attachment of the leading-edge vortex on insect wings.

Authors:  J M Birch; M H Dickinson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-16       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Unsteady two-dimensional theory of a flapping wing.

Authors:  F O Minotti
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2002-11-13

Review 4.  The aerodynamics of insect flight.

Authors:  Sanjay P Sane
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Short-amplitude high-frequency wing strokes determine the aerodynamics of honeybee flight.

Authors:  Douglas L Altshuler; William B Dickson; Jason T Vance; Stephen P Roberts; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A computational fluid dynamic study of hawkmoth hovering

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Aerodynamic characteristics of the wings and body of a dragonfly

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Unsteady forces and flows in low Reynolds number hovering flight: two-dimensional computations vs robotic wing experiments.

Authors:  Z Jane Wang; James M Birch; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  The aerodynamics of revolving wings II. Propeller force coefficients from mayfly to quail.

Authors:  James R Usherwood; Charles P Ellington
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion.

Authors:  Mao Sun; Jian Tang
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  The role of the leading edge vortex in lift augmentation of steadily revolving wings: a change in perspective.

Authors:  Mostafa R A Nabawy; William J Crowther
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  Dynamic experimental rigs for investigation of insect wing aerodynamics.

Authors:  Paul Broadley; Mostafa R A Nabawy; Mark K Quinn; William J Crowther
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.293

3.  A CFD-informed quasi-steady model of flapping wing aerodynamics.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Nakata; Hao Liu; Richard J Bomphrey
Journal:  J Fluid Mech       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.627

4.  Controlling free flight of a robotic fly using an onboard vision sensor inspired by insect ocelli.

Authors:  Sawyer B Fuller; Michael Karpelson; Andrea Censi; Kevin Y Ma; Robert J Wood
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Achieving bioinspired flapping wing hovering flight solutions on Mars via wing scaling.

Authors:  James E Bluman; Jeremy A Pohly; Madhu K Sridhar; Chang-Kwon Kang; David Brian Landrum; Farbod Fahimi; Hikaru Aono
Journal:  Bioinspir Biomim       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 2.956

Review 6.  Study of Mosquito Aerodynamics for Imitation as a Small Robot and Flight in a Low-Density Environment.

Authors:  Balbir Singh; Noorfaizal Yidris; Adi Azriff Basri; Raghuvir Pai; Kamarul Arifin Ahmad
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 2.891

7.  A Quasi-Steady Lifting Line Theory for Insect-Like Hovering Flight.

Authors:  Mostafa R A Nabawy; William J Crowthe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.