PURPOSE: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use has been increasing among cancer patients. This study characterizes the use of CAM among patients with thoracic malignancies. METHODS: This cross sectional study was conducted at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center among adult patients diagnosed with thoracic malignancies. The primary outcome was a self-reported use of CAM, defined as the use of any type of CAM beyond routine vitamin/mineral supplementation alone. A logistic regression model was developed to explore predictors of CAM use. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients completed a standardized survey (59% response rate). Overall, 42% of respondents reported the use of at least one type of CAM. Users and non-users of CAM did not differ based upon demographics, diagnosis, staging, smoking status, quality of life, or perceived understanding of cancer diagnosis. In the multivariate analysis, patients who reported feeling fearful about their future were four times more likely to be CAM users when compared to those who did not specify this emotion (odds ratio=4.18; 95% CI=1.23-14.12; p=0.02). Commonly cited reasons for CAM use were to support one's self, boost immunity, and for improvements in emotional and/or spiritual well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of CAM use among cancer patients in this study was similar to the general US population. Feeling fearful about the future was associated with CAM use. Results suggest that patients may be turning to CAM as a therapeutic adjunct to actively cope with emotional distress surrounding the cancer experience.
PURPOSE: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use has been increasing among cancerpatients. This study characterizes the use of CAM among patients with thoracic malignancies. METHODS: This cross sectional study was conducted at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center among adult patients diagnosed with thoracic malignancies. The primary outcome was a self-reported use of CAM, defined as the use of any type of CAM beyond routine vitamin/mineral supplementation alone. A logistic regression model was developed to explore predictors of CAM use. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients completed a standardized survey (59% response rate). Overall, 42% of respondents reported the use of at least one type of CAM. Users and non-users of CAM did not differ based upon demographics, diagnosis, staging, smoking status, quality of life, or perceived understanding of cancer diagnosis. In the multivariate analysis, patients who reported feeling fearful about their future were four times more likely to be CAM users when compared to those who did not specify this emotion (odds ratio=4.18; 95% CI=1.23-14.12; p=0.02). Commonly cited reasons for CAM use were to support one's self, boost immunity, and for improvements in emotional and/or spiritual well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of CAM use among cancerpatients in this study was similar to the general US population. Feeling fearful about the future was associated with CAM use. Results suggest that patients may be turning to CAM as a therapeutic adjunct to actively cope with emotional distress surrounding the cancer experience.
Authors: Jun James Mao; Christina Shearer Palmer; Kaitlin Elizabeth Healy; Krupali Desai; Jay Amsterdam Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2010-10-06 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Jun J Mao; Steve C Palmer; Joseph B Straton; Peter F Cronholm; Shimrit Keddem; Kathryn Knott; Marjorie A Bowman; Frances K Barg Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2008-04-15 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Aminah Jatoi; Rui Qin; Daniel Satele; Shaker Dakhil; Pankaj Kumar; David B Johnson; Sachdev P Thomas; Philip J Stella; Jose Castillo; Min Li; Martin Fernandez-Zapico Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-04-02 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: John Baptist Asiimwe; Prakash B Nagendrappa; Esther C Atukunda; Mauda M Kamatenesi; Grace Nambozi; Casim U Tolo; Patrick E Ogwang; Ahmed M Sarki Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2021-05-17 Impact factor: 2.650
Authors: Alex Molassiotis; Anne Fraser; Melissa Culligan; Pippa Labuc; Degi L Csaba; Andreas Charalambous Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2020-10-26 Impact factor: 6.244