Spermines are naturally abundant polyamines that partially condense nucleic acids and exhibit the proton-sponge effect in an acidic environment. However, spermines show a limited efficiency for transfecting nucleic acids because of their low molecular weight. Therefore, spermines need to be modified to be used as nonviral vectors for nucleic acids. Here, we synthesized linear bisspermine as well as a linear and dendritic tetraspermine with different molecular architectures. These oligospermines were self-assembled into polyplexes with siRNA. The structure-activity relationship of the oligospermines was evaluated in terms of their efficiency for delivering siRNA into a nonsmall cell lung carcinoma cell line. Oligospermines displayed minimal cytotoxicity but efficient siRNA condensation and showed better stability against polyanions than polyethylenimine. The morphology of the polyplexes was strongly affected by the oligospermine architecture. Linear tetraspermine/siRNA polyplexes showed the best gene-silencing efficiency among the oligospermines tested at both the mRNA and protein expression levels, indicating the most favorable structure for siRNA delivery.
Spermines are naturally abundant polyamines that partially condense nucleic acids and exhibit the proton-sponge effect in an acidic environment. However, spermines show a limited efficiency for transfecting nucleic acids because of their low molecular weight. Therefore, spermines need to be modified to be used as nonviral vectors for nucleic acids. Here, we synthesized linear bisspermine as well as a linear and dendritic tetraspermine with different molecular architectures. These oligospermines were self-assembled into polyplexes with siRNA. The structure-activity relationship of the oligospermines was evaluated in terms of their efficiency for delivering siRNA into a nonsmall cell lung carcinoma cell line. Oligospermines displayed minimal cytotoxicity but efficient siRNA condensation and showed better stability against polyanions than polyethylenimine. The morphology of the polyplexes was strongly affected by the oligospermine architecture. Linear tetraspermine/siRNA polyplexes showed the best gene-silencing efficiency among the oligospermines tested at both the mRNA and protein expression levels, indicating the most favorable structure for siRNA delivery.
RNA interference (RNAi)
is a post-transcriptional gene-silencing
mechanism (PTGS) that occurs naturally in the cell in a sequence-spn>ecific
manner to break down double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) and to regulate RNA
expn>ression.[1] RNAi-based therapn>eutics have
rapn>idly progressed from basic research to clinical trials. In 1998,
RNAi was discovered in n>an class="Species">Caenorhabditis elegans worms by Fire and Mello, for which they received the Nobel Prize
in Physiology and Medicine in 2006.[2] Small
interfering RNA (siRNA) is an intermediate in the RNAi process and
comprises double-stranded RNA of 21–25 nucleotides in length.
Synthetic siRNA can be used to achieve RNAi and to downregulate overexpressed
genes.[3,4] In 2001, siRNA was reported to induce RNAi
in mammalian cells.[5] At present, only a
few human clinical trials for siRNA therapeutics are ongoing; among
which, two therapeutics are targeting the lung (i.e., ALN-RSV01 and
ExcellairTM).[6]
The primary
challenge of siRNA therapeutics, however, is the hurdle
of intracellular delivery. siRNA cannot cross a biological membrane
because it is a hydrophilic, negatively charged macromolecule and
is highly prone to nuclease degradation.[4] Viral vectors achieve high transduction but are associated with
many safety problems at the clinical level such as immune responses
and carcinogensis.[7] Therefore, safe and
effective nonviral siRNA carriers are required for pulmonary delivery
of siRNA.[8]Cationic polymers interact
with negatively charged n>an class="Chemical">oligonucleoutides
via charge complexation to form polyelectrolyte complexes.[9,10] Endogenous spermines (SPE) are safe, naturally occurring, small,
linear tetraamines with two primary amines and two secondary amines.
Spermines aid in packaging cellular DNA into a compact state, which
is essential in cell growth processes in eukaryotic cells.[11−15] The polyamine structure is required for stable DNA binding. The
interaction between a single cationic amine and anionic phosphate
groups of nucleic acids is relatively week and is further weakened
by competition of salt binding under biological conditions.[14] Exogenous spermine poorly condenses and can
transfect nucleic acids into cells, which could be due to its low
molecular weight (∼200 Da).[16,17] In addition,
spermines yield limited endosomal escape despite their good proton-buffering
capacity.[17] It is hypothesized that the
maximum interaction of siRNA with cations consists of four carbon
bridges. However, the low molecular weight of spermine limits its
siRNA complexation ability.[18] Therefore,
it was necessary to modify the spermine units to increase their molecular
weight, which in turn may lead to increased buffering capacity and
enhanced endosomal escape and therefore enhanced transfection efficiency.[16,19] One way of modifying spermine is via polymerization of spermine
units. This suggests that polymerized spermines could be capable of
condensing siRNA and of disassembling at the target site.[20] Polyspermines have shown a high buffering capacity.[21] Many studies have described the linkage of spermines
through their amino groups by different cleavable linkers such as
disulfide bonds or esters.[16,21,22] When polyspermines are degraded to release spermine monomers, sometimes
fragments of the linker are still attached to spermine monomers, which
affects their transfection properties.[16,21] Very recently,
Du et al. compared three polymerized spermines and showed that linkage
structures play an important role in the activity of the polyspermine-based
nucleic acid carriers.[10]
Moreover,
sperminen>an class="Chemical">polymerization allows for multistep intracellular
degradation of a biocompatible polymeric platform.[20] Several groups have studied spermine-based carriers for
DNA,[16,23,24] siRNA,[16,25−28] and short RNA delivery,[29,30] some of which specifically
target lung cancer.[29−31] Spermines have been incorporated in many delivery
systems such as lipoplexes,[26,32] conjugates,[25] and nanoparticles[33] for siRNA delivery to enhance transfection efficiency. Vijayanathan
et al. synthesized a series of spermine homologues with different
methylene chain lengths separating the secondary amino groups of the
polyamines. The lower homologues, which contained shorter methylene
chains, were more efficacious in DNA condensation than the higher
analogues that contained longer methylene chains. These results showed
the importance of the regiochemical distribution of the positive charge
in the polyamines presented by the varying distance of methylene spacing,
which affected the polyamine’s ability to provoke structural
changes in the DNA and hence strongly affected the DNA condensation
and size of the DNA complexes.[34] Different
structures of spermine oligopolymers were studied, for example, when
spermine was used as surface groups of a dendron structure to target
humanbreast carcinoma cells (MDA-MB-231) and murine myoblast cells
(C2C12). Spermine-decorated dendrons were able to transfect DNA into
cells only in the presence of chloroquine, which enables endosomol
escape. Because blank spermine is completely protonated at physiological
pH, it is possible that these dendritic structures have only a limited
proton-sponge effect. It was concluded that dendritic spermine derivatives
act more similar to polylysine and not like proton-sponge polymers
such as polyamidoamine (PAMAM) or polyethylenimine (PEI).[17]
In this study, spermine units were polymerized
to synthesize different
chemical structures of oligospermines described as linear bisspermine,
linear tetraspermine, and dendritic tetraspermine. These cationic
polymers were used to condense siRNA molecules in the form of polyplexes.
Oligospermine/siRNA polyplexes were characterized and evaluated as
nonviral carriers for condensation, stability, and transfection of
siRNA and gene knockdown in H1299humannonsmall cell lung carcinoma
cells. The aim of this study was to identify a suitable oligospermine
architecture for siRNA delivery.
Experimental
Section
Materials
Linear bisspermine (n>an class="CellLine">MW 1299.40), linear tetraspermine
(MW 2581.82), and dendritic tetratspermine (MW 2625.87) were synthesized
as described below. Lipofectamine 2000 (LF), SYBR Gold dye, and (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium
bromide (MTT) were purchased from Life Technologies (Grand Island,
NY). Polyethylenimine (PEI, MW 5 kDa) was obtained from BASF (Lupasol,
Cologne, Germany). Dicer substrate double-stranded siRNA (DsiRNA)
targeting the firefly luciferase gene (FLUC siRNA, 25/27-mer), humanglyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (hGAPDH) gene, and nonspecific
control (siNegCon) DsiRNA as well as Alexa Fluor-488 labeled siRNA
were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT, Coralville,
IA). RPMI-1640 medium (1×) with 2.05 mM l-glutamine,
HyClone trypsin, penicillin/streptomycin, 4-(2(hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazine
ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), and SurePrep TrueTotal RNA purification
kits were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA). Dulbecco’s
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum
(FBS), d-(+)-glucose, sodium bicarbonate, sodium pyruvate,
2-mercaptoethanol, dimethyl sulfoxide Hybri-Max (DMSO, ≥99.7%),
ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA, 99.4–100.06%), trypan
blue (0.4%, sterile filtered), and luciferin solution were purchased
from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Hs_GAPDH_primers and Hs_β-actin-primers
were purchased from Qiagen (Valencia, CA). Brilliant III SYBR green
qRT-PCR master mix was purchased from Agilent (Santa Clara, CA), and
DNase I reaction buffer and DNase/RNase-free water were purchased
from Zymo Research (Irvine, CA).
Synthesis of Oligospermines
Three different polycatonic-based
oligospermines, namely, linear n>an class="Chemical">bisspermines, linear tetraspermines,
and dendritic tetraspermines (Figure 1), were
successfully synthesized as described previously.[35] Briefly, the process involved (1) the synthesis of MPBBSP
(monoprotected bis-boc spermine) monomer I, (2) the synthesis of the
reactive intermediates of the 2- and 4-arm linkers, and (3) the conjugation
of monomer I to the linkers to obtain the respective protected oligospermines.
Deprotection of the boc groups yielded oligospermines as salts of
trifluoroacetic acid that were used for biological characterization.
All compounds synthesized were characterized using NMR, MS/MALDI,
and HPLC to confirm their identity and purity.
Figure 1
Chemical structures of
(A) linear bisspermine, (B) linear tetraspermine,
and (C) dendritic tetraspermine.
Chemical structures of
(A) linear bisspermine, (B) linear tetraspermine,
and (C) dendritic tetraspermine.
Preparation of Oligospermines–siRNA Polyplexes
The ratio
between the polymer amine groups (N) and the siRNA phosphate groups
(P) in a polyplex is defined as the N/P ratio. The N/P ratio obtained
after complexation was calculated on the basis of the molecular weight,
the number of protonatable units of the oligospermines, and the number
of base pairs in the siRNA duplexes. Polymer stock solutions (1 mg/mL)
were diluted with a 5% glucose solution, and siRNA stock solutions
(100 μM) were diluted with RNase-free water. All solutions used
were filtered with 0.2 μm pore size syringe filters (Fisher
Scientific). The amount of oligospermines required to prepare polyplexes
with a specific amount of siRNA and at a specific N/P ratio was calculated
as followswhere m is
the mass of the polymer needed and n is the amount
of siRNA used per well. The total number of nucleotides in DsiRNA
is 52. N/P is the ratio between polymer amine groups and siRNA phosphate
groups.Equal volumes of pan class="Chemical">polymer and siRNA solutions were mixed
to obtain the appropriate N/pan class="Chemical">P ratio, vortexed for 30 s, and incubated
at room temperature for 20 min.
Size and Zeta (ζ)-Potential
Analysis
Sizes of
the polyplexes were evaluated by dynamic light-scattering (DLS) analysis.
Polyplexes were prepn>ared with 40 pmol of FLUC siRNA at N/n>an class="Chemical">P ratios
of 2 and 10, as described above, in a total volume of 350 μL.
Measurements were performed with a Zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern Instruments
Inc., Westborough, MA) in quadruplicate at 25 °C using disposable
cuvettes (low volume 70 μL, Brookhaven Instruments Corporation,
Holtsville, NY) for size measurements. Measurements were set up at
a 173° backscatter angle with 15 runs per measurement. For data
analysis, the viscosity (0.88 mPa s) and the refractive index (1.33)
of water at 25 °C were used. Results are given as Z average in nanometers ± standard deviation. Polyplexes were
then diluted to 700 μL with a 5% glucose solution before ζ-potential
measurements were performed in disposable capillary cells (Malvern
Instruments Inc.). Results are given in millivolts ± standard
deviation.
Size and Morphology: Transmission Electron
Microscopy (TEM)
and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)
For transmission electron
microscopy (TEM), polyplexes were prepared as described above at a
N/P ratio of 2 with 40 pmol of FLUC siRNA in a total volume of 20
μL. A dropn> of particle suspn>ension was dispn>ensed on a n>an class="Chemical">copper-coated
grid (200 mesh) and left to dry before imaging with a transmission
electron microscope (JEOL 2010 TEM). Several representative images
were taken for each sample at different magnifications. Atomic force
microscopy (AFM) was performed using a Pico LE atomic force microscope
(Molecular Imaging, Agilent Technologies). Polyplex suspensions were
freshly prepared as described above. A drop was incubated on a freshly
cleaved mica surface for 5 min and rinsed with deionized water to
remove excess liquid. Samples were allowed to dry at room temperature
and imaged in contact mode using a Si3Ni4 V-shaped
cantilever.
siRNA Condensation
Efficiency and Stability against Polyanions under Neutral and Acidic
Conditions: SYBR Gold Dye Binding Assays and Heparin Competition Assays
SYBR Gold assays were used to evaluate the capacity of the oligospermines
to condense siRNA at various N/n>an class="Chemical">P ratios (0–20). SYBR Gold dye
intercalates only with free and accessible siRNA and does not fluoresce
if the siRNA is condensed and protected by a polycation. In a FluoroNunc
96-well white polystyrene plate (Nunc, Thermo Fisher Scientific),
50 pmol of FLUC siRNA per well in 50 μL was complexed with the
appropriate amount of oligospermine in the same volume to obtain the
corresponding N/P ratios in a total volume of 100 μL of a 5%
glucose solution. PEI (5 kDa) was used for comparison. Formulations
were incubated at room temperature for 20 min. A 4× SYBR Gold
solution (30 μL) was added to each well, and plates were incubated
in the dark for 10 min. Fluorescence was measured at 495 and 537 nm
excitation and emission wavelengths, respectively, on a Synergy 2
multi-mode microplate reader (BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT). For
heparin assays, polyplexes were prepared at a N/P ratio of 2 as described
above. In addition, experiments were performed in the presence of
two different media to compare the stability of the polyplexes at
different pH and ionic strengths. The media used were a 5% glucose
solution (pH 7.4) and sodium acetate buffer (pH 4.5). For the heparin
assays, a master solution of heparin was prepared (0.1 IU/μL).
Serial dilutions of heparin were then prepared (0–1 IU/well)
and added to the wells (10 μL/well). Subsequently, a 4×
SYBR Gold solution (30 μL/well) was added, and plates were incubated
for 10 min. After different incubation times with heparin (20 min
and 1, 2, and 3 h) at 25 °C, fluorescence was measured on a Synergy
2 multi-mode microplate reader (BioTek Instruments) at 495 and 537
nm excitation and emission wavelengths, respectively. Measurements
were performed in triplicate. The relative stability of the polyplexes
was determined by normalizing the fluorescence intensity of the intercalating
SYBR Gold dye to SYBR gold only (0%) and to SYBR gold with free siRNA
(100%). Results are shown as mean values ± standard deviation
and analyzed by GraphPad Prism 5.0 software (GraphPad Software, La
Jolla, CA).
Cell Culture
NCI-H1299/LUC cells
are derived from a
humannonsmall cell lung carcinoma cell line (ATCC) that was transfected
to stably express the reporter gene luciferase.[36] H1299/LUC represents an established model for gene knockdown
studies, as shown previously.[36,37] Cells were cultured
and grown in RPMI-1640 cell culture medium (Thermo Scientific Hyclone,
Pittsburgh, PA) supplemented with sodium pyruvate (1 mM), HEPES (10
mM), 10% fetal bovine serum (Thermo Scientific Hyclone), and 1% penicillin/streptomycin.
Cells were grown in 75 cm2 cell culture flasks (Thermo
Scientific) at 37 °C and 5% CO2 and subcultured until
approximately 90% confluence, with fresh culture medium changes occurring
every 2 to 3 days.
Cytotoxicity of Polyplexes: MTT Assay
H1299/LUC cells
were seeded in a 96-well plate (Thermo Scientific) with 10 000
cells per well in 100 μL of growth medium and incubated for
24 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in a HERAcell 150i CO2 incubator (Thermo Scientific). Oligospermines with varying
concentrations (2–1000 μg/mL) were added to the cells
in fresh media, and plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C and
5% CO2. A sterile-filtered MTT solution (5 mg/mL) was added
to the cells (10 μL/well), and plates were incubated for 4 h
at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Water-soluble MTT is enzymatically
converted to insoluble formazan particles by metabolically active
mitochondria.[38] Subsequently, the cell
culture media was removed, DMSO (200 μL/well) was added, and
platest were incubated at room temperature for 10 min to solubilize
the formazan particles. The optical absorbance was measured at 540
nm on a Synergy 2 multi-mode microplate reader (BioTek Instruments).
The percentage of cell viability and proliferation is measured as
the ratio between the absorbance of a sample and the untreated control
cells. Results are shown as the mean value ± standard deviation
of triplicate samples.
Quantification of Cellular Uptake by Flow
Cytomtery
H1299/LUC cells were seeded in 24-well plates (Corning
Incorpn>orated,
Corning, NY) at a density of 200 000 cells/well, and plates
were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C and 5% n>an class="Chemical">CO2. Polyplexes
were freshly prepared as described above with 40 pmol of Alexa Fluor
488-labeled siRNA at N/P ratios of 2 and 10. Negative controls included
untreated control cells. PEI (5 kDa) was used as a positive control
for comparison. Cells were transfected for 4 h with 100 μL of
cell culture medium and 100 μL of polyplexes, after which growth
medium was added to a total volume of 500 μL, and cells were
incubated for another 20 h. Trypan blue quenching was used to extinguish
the extracellular fluorescence caused by polyplex binding and to confirm
the internalization of siRNA in the cells. Trypan blue 0.4% (100 μL
per well), a dye that quenches the extracellular fluorescence,[39,40] was added to the samples for 5 min before trypsinizing the cells.
Results were compared to those obtained with cells that did not undergo
trypan blue staining. Cells were rinsed with 1× PBS supplemented
with 2 mM EDTA, treated with trypsin, and incubated at 37 °C
and 5% CO2 for 3 to 4 min to detach the cells. Fresh medium
(400 μL) was added to each well to deactivate the trypsin. Samples
were transferred to microcentrifuge tubes (Seal-Rite, USA Scientific,
Orlando, FL) and centrifuged at 400g for 5 min. Samples
were washed twice with 1× PBS supplemented with 2 mM EDTA. Fluorescence
was quantified by flow cytometry on an LSR II (BD Biosciences, San
Jose, CA) after staining with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
(DAPI) for dead cells. Cell fluorescence was measured with excitation
at 488 nm, and a 530/30 band-passfilter set was used to detect emission.
Cell gating and data analysis were performed using FACSDiva (BD Biosciences)
software. Measurements were performed in triplicate; for each measurement,
10 000 viable cells were gated and analyzed. Mean fluorescence
intensity (MFI) results are given as the mean value of three independent
measurements. Data analysis was performed by GraphPad Prism 5.0 software.
RNA Knockdown Measured by qRT-PCR
In 6-well plates (Corning Incorporated),
H1299/LUC cells were seeded at a density of 500 000 cells/well,
and plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C and 5% n>an class="Chemical">CO2. Polyplexes were prepared with 200 pmol of hGAPDH siRNA at a N/P
ratio of 2 in a total volume of 100 μL and were added to 1 mL
of cell culture medium per well. LF (0.5 μL/10 pmol of siRNA)
was used as a positive transfection control. Cells were transfected
with samples in fresh medium and incubated for 4 h. After 4 h of incubation,
medium was added to a total volume of 3 mL, and cells were allowed
to incubate for an additional 20 h. Subsequently, cells were washed
with 1× PBS and lysed with lysis buffer (SurePrep True Total
RNA Purification Kit (Fisher BioReagents, Fisher Scientific). Total
RNA was then isolated from cells according to the manufacturer’s
protocol with supplementary DNase I digestion, reverse transcribed
to cDNA, and cDNA was amplified in a one-step protocol using Brilliant
III SYBR green qRT-PCR master mix. Hs_GAPDH primers were used to quantify
the gene expression of hGAPDH. Hs_β-actin primers were employed
as a standard to evaluate the relative gene expression of the two
genes. Serial dilutions of total RNA from untreated cells were performed
to plot calibration curves for GAPDH and β-actin mRNA levels.
Measurements were performed on a Stratagene Mx 3005P (Agilent Technologies).
Ct values were analyzed with MxPro software (Mx 3005P version). Results
are shown as mean values ± standard deviation of triplicate measurements
and were analyzed by GraphPad Prism 5.0 software.
Protein Knockdown
Measured in Reporter Gene Assays
H1299/LUC cells were seeded
at a density of 25 000 cells/well
in 24-well plates (Corning Incorpn>orated), and plates were incubated
at 37 °C and 5% n>an class="Chemical">CO2 for 24 h before transfection.
Cells were transfected with polyplexes with 40 pmol FLUC siRNA or
nonspecific control DsiRNA at a N/P ratio of 2 and were allowed to
incubate for 4 h. Commercially available LF 2000 was used as a positive
control. After 4 h of incubation, medium was added to a total volume
of 500 μL, and plates were incubated for an additional 44 h.
Cells were washed with 1× PBS and lysed with cell culture lysis
reagent (CCLR 1×, 100 μL/well, Promega, Fisher Scientific)
for 10 min. Cell lysates were then transferred to microcentrifuge
tubes and centrifuged at 15 000g for 5 min.
Luciferase expression was quantified by mechanical injection of 50
μL of luciferase assay buffer containing 10 mM luciferin into
each well containing 20 μL of cell lysate, and relative light
units (RLU) were measured using a Synergy 2 multi-mode microplate
reader (BioTek Instruments) as the mean value of gene expression relative
to untreated cells with full expression (100%) ± standard deviation
of triplicate measurements. Data was statistically analyzed using
GraphPad Prism 5.0 software.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis
of Oligospermines
Spermine monomers were
covalently coupled to yield three different n>an class="Chemical">polymers with different
amounts of spermine units and distinct geometrical structures. The
three polymers tested here are linear bisspermine, linear tetraspermine,
and dendritic tetraspermine. The nomenclature of the polymers is based
on the structure and number of spermine monomers. Oligospermine polymers
were characterized by NMR and purified by HPLC. Molecular weights
of the polymers were obtained by mass spectrometry for linear bisspermine
(MW 1299.40), linear tetraspermine (MW 2581.82), and dendritic tetraspermine
(MW 2625.87). The different architectures of the oligospermines were
chosen to obtain differences in the charge distribution over the different
structures. Our aim was to compare the siRNA polyplex formation of
linear and dendritic structures with different cationic charge densities.
At the neutral pH (7.4) of the intra- and extracellular environment,
it is expected that only the primary amines are protonated, whereas
only a small portion of the secondary amines are protonated.[11] The linear and dendritic tetraspermines both
bear eight protonable secondary amines compared to the linear bisspermine,
which carries only half of the amount of protonable amines. This suggests
that the tetraspermines have the ability to act as proton-sponge polymers
at the acidic pH of the endolysosomal compartment.[41] The structure of linear tetraspermine possesses multiple
spermine units in a linear arrangement, which enables cross-linking
of single oligospermine molecules. Cross-linked polymers have been
reported to interact better with negatively charged regions of nucleic
acids and can therefore yield enhanced transfection efficiencies.[42]
Dendritic structures are also very attractive
as gene and drug delivery systems because they can be flexible structures
with a multitude of end groups. The latter can be exploited to attach
ligands, which opens various opportunities for cell-specific targeting.
Because of their structure, dendrimers are believed to be more accessible
for electrostatic interaction with RNA.[43] In flexible dendrimers, the pan class="Chemical">amines located within the inner structure
are accessible for protonation, which results in an increased proton-sponge
effect[44] and consequently a better transfection
efficiency.[43]
To achieve
efficient transfection, polyplexes must be well-characterized and
reproducible. Many of the physicochemical propn>erties of polyplexes
determine if they can overcome intracellular and extracellular barriers.[45] Their size is an important factor for intracellular
uptake and transfection. Some repn>orts indicate that particles with
a size below 150 nm are required for uptake in lung cells by endocytosis.[46,47] However, other repn>orts describe n>an class="Chemical">spermine-based delivery systems
with a larger size that have a good transfection efficiency in vivo
and are suitable for lung cancer gene therapy.[29] The ability of oligospermines to condense siRNA and to
form polyplexes with defined structures was therefore evaluated here.
Polyplexes prepared with 40 pmol of FLUC siRNA at N/P ratios of 2,
5, and 10 were compared in terms of their hydrodynamic diameters and
zeta potentials. The change in the size and zeta potential of the
polyplexes as a function of the carrier/siRNA ratio was examined to
determine a suitable N/P ratio for further investigations. All three
oligospermines were able to condense siRNA into particles of sizes
from 198.7 to 423.1 nm in diameter (Table 1). All polyplexes at a N/P ratio of 5 were at least slightly larger
than those at a N/P ratio of 2, which is in line with an earlier report
that described N/P ratio-dependent trends in the sizes of siRNA polyplexes.[48] Interestingly, both linear oligospermines showed
an increase in size with increasing N/P ratios. Apparently, these
polymers wrapped around the siRNA efficiently at an N/P ratio as low
as 2 and then formed further layers of polymer on the surface of the
polyplex. Another indication that supports this hypothesis is the
increase of the zeta potential for the linear tetraspermine polyplexes
with increasing N/P ratio (Table 1). Although
linear bisspermine/siRNA polyplexes did not show a significant change
in the zeta potential when increasing the N/P ratio, the zeta potentials
of linear tetraspermine polyplexes increased from 1.5 to 10.6 to 12.7
mV for N/P ratios of 2, 5, and 10, respectively.
Table 1
Hydrodynamic Diameters and Zeta-Potential
Values of siRNA Polyplexes Made with Linear Bisspermine, Linear Tetraspermine,
and Dendritic Tetraspermine at N/P Ratios of 2, 5, and 10 at Room
Temperaturea
parameter
size (nm)
zeta-potential (mV)
polymer in polyplex/N/P ratio
linear
bisspermine
linear tetraspermine
dendritic tetraspermine
linear bisspermine
linear
tetraspermine
dendritic tetraspermine
N/P 2
253.4 ± 26.3
198.7 ± 22
311.5 ± 18.5
6.1 ± 0.6
1.5 ± 0.5
12 ± 0.8
N/P 5
289.2 ± 30
339.6 ± 13.8
351 ± 16.5
7.2 ± 0.2
10.6 ± 1.1
13.6 ± 1.1
N/P 10
423.1 ± 30.9
317.3 ± 22.5
225.4 ± 15.8
6.1 ± 0.5
12.7 ± 0.7
17.6 ± 1.8
A 5% glucose solution was used
as the suspension medium.
A 5% pan class="Chemical">glucose solution was used
as the suspension medium.
The dendritic tetraspermine, however, formed polypn>lexes with decreased
size at a N/P ratio of 10 (225.4 nm in diameter and 17.6 mV). This
behavior can be explained by its intertwining structure that results
in not all amines of the tetraspermine being available for electrostatic
interaction with siRNA at low N/P ratios. The comparably high zeta
potentials that these polyplexes bear also support the idea of positively
charged dendrimer arms that are unable to be neutralized by the interaction
with phosphates.[49] However, these relatively
high zeta potentials could possibly mediate cytotoxicity.[50] Zeta potentials of dendritic tetraspermines
polyplexes increased with increasing N/P ratios. Comparing polyplexes
of linear and dendritic tetraspermines, the zeta potential of the
linear tetraspermine polyplexes was lower than that of the dendritic
tetraspermine polyplexes at all of the tested N/P ratios (2, 5, and
10; Table 1). The surface charge of polyplexes
is a significant factor for the transfection efficiency of the polymer.
Other studies have shown the ability of spermine-based polymers to
neutralize the negative charge of nucleic acids to yield an overall
neutralized to slightly positive charge suitable for interaction with
the negatively charged cell membrane.[19] In our study, all oligospermines polyplexes were positively charged
(Table 1).Another prerequisite for successful
and reproducible transfection,
especially in vivo, is a narrow size distribution of the polyplexes.[49] The polydispersity, expressed as the polydispersity
index (PDI), was low for polyplexes formed with the linear n>an class="Chemical">bisspermine
(0.14 < PDI < 0.3) compared to those formulated with linear
tetraspermine (0.26 < PDI < 0.34) and dendritic tetraspermine
(0.22 < PDI < 0.36; Table SI 1).
The broader size distribution of the polyplexes obtained with the
tetraspermines can be interpreted as a result of coalescence of the
polyplexes caused by interaction between one longer polycationic polymer
with more than one siRNA molecule.[49] Many
physical and biological parameters, such as the molecular weight,
play an important role in determining the efficiency of a polymer
to condense and deliver siRNA.[51] Linear
tetraspermine (MW 2581.82) and dendritic tetraspermine (MW 2625.87)
naturally have a higher molecular weight compared to linear bisspermine
(MW 1299.40), which affects the ability of the polymers to interact
with siRNA and to form polyplexes. As reflected by the size and zeta-potential
data shown in Table 1, the structure of the
polymer also plays a very important role in the ability of an oligospermine
to interact electrostatically with siRNA.
On the basis of these
results, the linear tetraspermine/siRNA polypn>lexes
seemed to be the most favorable, with the smallest size at a N/P ratio
of 2 (198.7 ± 22 nm) and a slightly positive zeta potential (1.54
mV). These characteristics are caused by (1) a favorable number of
positively charged spermine units (four units) and (2) the linear
structure, which seems to be important for efficient interaction with
siRNA and yielding a low positive charge close to a neutral surface
charge that facilitates the crossing of the particle across the negatively
charged cell membrane barrier. Polyplexes at a N/P ratio of 2 with
hydrodynamic diameters of 253.4 ± 26.3 nm for linear bisspermine
polyplexes, 198.7 ± 22 nm for linear tetraspermine polyplexes,
and 311.5 ± 18.5 nm for dendritic tetraspermine polyplexes were
therefore selected for further experiments.
Size and Morphology: Transmission
Electron Microscopy (TEM)
and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)
The morphologies and sizes
of the different polyplexes at a N/P ratio of 2 were imaged by AFM
(Figure 2). The sizes of the polyplexes estimated
from the AFM images were 24–73 nm for linear n>an class="Chemical">bisspermine polyplexes,
101–348 nm for linear tetraspermine polyplexes, and 202–480
nm for polyplexes made with the dendritic tetraspermine. The differences
between the sizes obtained by DLS compared to the AFM images can be
explained by the different processes used to prepare the samples for
DLS and AFM. The hydrodynamic diameters were determined in a suspension
of the particles, whereas the particles were dried for AFM. It is
possible that the polyplexes coalesced during the drying step. Additionally,
the broad size distribution of the polyplexes shown by the imaging
technique and confirmed by the polydispersity measurements (PDI) can
explain why the Z average of the hydrodynamic diameters
does not reflect the sizes measured by AFM. Most importantly, the
AFM images showed different morphologies of oligospermine polyplexes
as a result of the different chemical architectures of the polymers
used. It is also possible that aggregation of particles occurred during
the drying step. Both of the linear oligospermines formed spherical
particles, whereas the dendritic tetraspermine complexes show a less
defined morphology. These observations strengthen the hypothesis that
linear oligospermines wrap around siRNA and condense it efficiently,
whereas not all arms of the dendritic tetraspermine are involved in
siRNA condensation, as shown in the fuzzy morphology of the polyplexes.
Figure 2
AFM images
of polyplexes at a N/P ratio of 2 with (A) linear bisspermine,
(B) linear tetraspermine, and (C) dendritic tetraspermine showing
different morphologies.
AFM images
of polyplexes at a N/P ratio of 2 with (A) linear bisspermine,
(B) linear tetraspermine, and (C) dendritic tetraspermine showing
different morphologies.TEM showed electron-dense areas in the polyplexes, which
could
be the siRNA, and the presence of very small particles (about 40 nm)
in all polyplex formulations besides larger particles of 440, 330,
and 189 nm for linear bisspermine, linear n>an class="Chemical">tetraspermine, and dendritic
tetraspermine polyplexes, respectively (Figure
SI 1). AFM confirmed such small polyplexes (about 40 nm). The
presence of small particles could explain the rather broad size distribution
of the formulations.
Spermines have shown a higher DNA condensation and stabilization
efficiency compn>ared to other naturally occurring polyamines such as
spermidine and putrescine.[52] Spermine-based
delivery systems condense DNA molecules by electrostatic interactions.[53] Therefore, SYBR Gold assays were employed to
compare the ability of different oligospermines to condense siRNA
at various N/P ratios.[54] In this assay,
free or unbound siRNA is accessible to the intercalating dye, SYBR
Gold, and is subsequently quantified on the basis of the fluorescence
emitted. Results were compared to low-molecular-weight PEI (5 kDa)
as a control. As expected, all of the polyplexes assayed were able
to condense siRNA more efficiently as the N/P ratio increased (Figure 3). At higher N/P ratios, the net positive charge
of the polyplexes was shown to increase, which is reflected by increasing
zeta potentials (Table 1). With the rise of
the zeta potential, the electrostatic interaction is enhanced, which
is followed by higher condensation. All oligospermines were able to
completely condense siRNA at N/P ratios of 2 and higher, whereas complete
condensation of siRNA was achieved only at N/P ratios of 5 and higher
for low-molecular-weight PEI. These results indicate that oligospermines
tend to bind siRNA with higher affinity than PEI at low N/P ratios.
Noticeably, linear bisspermine/siRNA polyplexes at a N/P ratio of
2 showed relatively low condensation of siRNA compared to the other
two oligospermines. This observation can be explained by the low molecular
weight and short chain length of bisspermine compared to the tetraspermines.
The fact that the condensation efficiency did not increase for the
bisspermine by increasing the N/P ratio additionally corroborates
the observation of almost constant zeta potentials. Polyplexes with
a N/P ratio of 2 were selected for further experiments based on their
small size and overall good siRNA condensation ability.
Figure 3
Condensation
efficiency of oligospermines polyplexes measured by
SYBR Gold intercalation of siRNA at increasing N/P ratios and compared
to polyethylenimine (PEI 5 kDa). Results are given as the average
of n = 3 ± SD.
Condensation
efficiency of oligosperminespolypn>lexes measured by
SYBR Gold intercalation of siRNA at increasing N/P ratios and compared
to polyethylenimine (PEI 5 kDa). Results are given as the average
of n = 3 ± SD.The stability of cationic polyplexes is important for determining
their efficiency as nonviral vectors. Their stability is influenced
by the presence of competing anions[55] in
the cell membrane[56] or in serum.[36] Heparin assays were therefore performed to confirm
the ability of n>an class="Chemical">oligospermines to protect the siRNA in the presence
of polyanions under physiologically relevant conditions. Different
pH conditions were chosen to mimic the neutral (7.4) or acidic (4.5)
environment of the cytoplasm and endolysosome, respectively. The stability
of all polyplexes decreased with increasing heparin concentration.
The amount of siRNA released from the polyplexes increased rapidly
as a function of heparin concentration. However, oligospermine polyplexes
maintained higher stability profiles than PEI (5 kDa) polyplexes against
heparin competition, especially at low concentrations of heparin (Figure 4). It is important to note that the release profile
from low-molecular-weight PEI complexes needs to be evaluated in the
context of its poor condensation at a N/P ratio of 2. As shown in
Figure 3, at a N/P ratio of 2, 75% of the siRNA
is not yet condensed by 5 kDa PEI. It is not surprising, therefore,
that the same amount of siRNA (75%) is found to be accessible for
intercalation even in the absence of heparin. The remaining 25% of
the siRNA is consequently very easily released from the complexes,
as shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4
Release profiles of siRNA
from oligospermines polyplexes (N/P ratio
of 2; 50 pmol siRNA/well) compared to polyethylenimine (PEI) as a
function of heparin concentration at pH (A) 7.4 and (B) 4.5. Results
are given as mean normalized fluorescence (n = 3)
± SD.
Release profiles of siRNA
from oligosperminespolypn>lexes (N/P ratio
of 2; 50 pmol siRNA/well) compared to polyethylenimine (PEI) as a
function of heparin concentration at pH (A) 7.4 and (B) 4.5. Results
are given as mean normalized fluorescence (n = 3)
± SD.At neutral pH, less than 75% of
the siRNA was released from the
oligospermine compn>lexes even at the highest heparin concentration
(Figure 4A). Because a balance between complexation
and decomplexation is necessary to release siRNA in the cytosol for
efficient incorporation to the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC),
the release profiles at lysosomal pH were tested also. At acidic pH,
many amines, especially in PEI, which are not protonated at pH 7.4,
were charged, leading to an increase of the complexation efficiency.
However, siRNA was easily released from PEI complexes at comparably
low heparin concentrations at acidic pH (Figure 4B). In comparison, oligospermine complexes displayed better stability
again. In the acidic environment, the tetraspermine complexes released
comparable amounts of siRNA as PEI at high heparin concentrations.
Only bisspermine lacked efficient decomplexation properties.To study the development of the polyplexes stability against heparin
over time, n>an class="Chemical">heparin stability assays were performed for each polyplex
after different incubation periods (20 min and 1, 2, and 3 h) with
heparin at both pH 7.4 and 4.5 (Supporting Information). At pH 7.4, all polyplexes showed a slight increase of siRNA release
over time. The strongest effects were observed for the linear spermine
polyplexes. These differences can be explained by the structural differences
of the oligospermines and their different interaction with siRNA.
Although it is hypothesized that the linear oligospermines wrap around
the siRNA and are efficiently neutralized, as reflected by rather
low zeta potentials, not all amines of the dendritic oligospermine
seem to be involved in the interaction with siRNA. It can therefore
be understood that an excess of heparin binds to positively charged
parts of the dendritic oligospermine before it displaces siRNA from
a complex. Prolonged incubation of high concentrations of heparin
with polyplexes made of linear spermines, however, results in more
quantitative competition with siRNA and thus release of the latter.
Polymer Cytotoxicity: MTT Assay
The formulation of
nonviral vectors composed of cationic polymers and anionic nucleic
acids is constrained by the compromise of high transfection efficiency,
which is oftentimes achieved only at the price of high n>an class="Disease">cytotoxicity.[57,58] Using cationic polymers with high molecular weight and charge density
can protect the resulting polyplex from destabilization by natural
cellular polyanions. The trade off, however, is that these positive
charges can interact with cell membranes, inhibit crucial biological
processes, and lead to cytotoxic effects.[50] MTT assays were therefore used to evaluate the cytotoxic effect
of the three cationic oligospermine polymers on H1299/LUC cells after
24 h of incubation with the polymers. Results are presented as the
percentage of cell viability compared to untreated control cells.
As expected, the cytotoxicity of oligospermines increased with increasing
polymer concentration. Moreover, increasing the cationic charge of
the polymer by increasing the number of spermine moieties also increased
the cytotoxicity. Linear tetraspermine and dendritic tetraspermine
showed a higher toxicity at higher concentrations when compared to
linear bisspermine. This trend is due to the presence of a higher
number of positively charged groups at neutral pH in the linear tetraspermine
(13 positively charged groups) and dendritic tetraspermine (14 positively
charged groups) compared to linear bisspermine (7 positively charged
groups). The dendritic tetrasperminepolymer was even more toxic than
the linear tetraspermine at high concentrations (0.5–1 mg/mL),
which may be due to its structure. On the basis of the obtained data
points, the nonlinear fit for the dendritic spermine was not optimal.
Nevertheless, the IC50 values reflect the trends of the
toxicity of the materials very well. In conclusion, all oligospermines
affected the cell viability significantly less than PEI (5 kDa, IC50 = 50.4 μg/mL) and commercially available LF 2000TM
(IC50 = 45.7 μg/mL). At the corresponding polymer
concentrations in the polyplexes used in the following experiments,
the cell viability was at least 83% after treatment with linear bisspermine,
88% with linear tetraspermine, and 77.3% with dendritic tetraspermine
(Figure 5). It is important to note that the
positive charge of the polymers is neutralized after polyplex formation
with siRNA, so the viability shown here after treatment with polymer
only is the assumption of a worst-case scenario.
Figure 5
Cytotoxicity profiles
of oligospermine polymers obtained by MTT
assays and compared to polyethylenimine (PEI) and lipofectamine (LF).
Percentage of viability of H1299/LUC cells is shown as a function
of increasing polymer concentration after 24 h of polymer incubation.
The table shows the IC50 concentrations of the polymers
in milligrams per milliliter.
Cytotoxicityprofiles
of oligospermine polymers obtained by MTT
assays and compared to polyethylenimine (PEI) and lipofectamine (LF).
Percentage of viability of H1299/LUC cells is shown as a function
of increasing polymer concentration after 24 h of polymer incubation.
The table shows the IC50 concentrations of the polymers
in milligrams per milliliter.
Quantification of Cellular Uptake by Flow Cytomtery
Cellular
uptake was quantified by flow cytometry and compared to
PEI (5 kDa) as a positive control and untreated cells as a negative
control. n>an class="Chemical">Polyplexes with 40 pmol of Alexa Fluor 488-labeled siRNA
at N/P ratios of 2 and 10 were compared. Additionally, 0.4% trypan
blue was used on the cells to quench the extracellular fluorescence
associated with polyplexes that bind to the surface but are not internalized.
The results were compared to trypan blue-untreated cells. Overall,
trypan blue-treated cells showed slightly lower mean fluorescence
intensities compared to cells that did not undergo quenching of bound
polyplexes. This indicates that a small fraction of the siRNA polyplexes
was attached to the cell membrane but was not taken up intracellularly.
Among the oligospermine polyplexes, the highest cellular uptake was
achieved by polyplexes made of linear tetraspermine/Alexa Fluor 488-siRNA
at a N/P ratio of 2 (no trypan blue treatment) (Figure 6). These results are surprising because linear tetraspermine
polyplexes were almost neutral at a N/P ratio of 2 (1.54 ± 0.5
mV), whereas dendritic tetraspermine polyplexes had a more cationic
zeta potential (12 ± 0.85 mV). However, these results can be
interpreted as each molecule of the linear tetraspermine being able
to interact with more siRNA molecules than the dendritic tetraspermine,
resulting in better charge neutralization and a lower zeta potential
but higher uptake of siRNA. In addition, the smaller size of linear
tetraspermine polyplexes (198 ± 22 nm) compared to the dendritic
tetraspermine polyplexes (311.5 ± 18.5) obtained by DLS could
potentially enhance the cellular uptake. For polymers such as PEI,
an increase of the zeta potential, which is obtained by increasing
the N/P ratio, is expected to mediate stronger siRNA delivery. This
trend was confirmed here. However, PEI polyplexes at high N/P ratios
are known to cause toxicity and off-target effects in transfected
cells.[59] Although the siRNA delivery by
oligospermine polyplexes was comparable to PEI at a N/P ratio of 2,
an increase of the N/P ratio to 10 did not increase their efficiency.
Linear tetraspermine polyplexes at a N/P ratio of 2 were found to
have the smallest hydrodynamic diameters, however. It is possible
that this parameter is favorable for uptake and crossing of the barrier
of the cell membrane. Additionally, the spherical morphology of the
linear oligospermine complexes compared to the fuzzy morphology of
the dendritic tetraspermine polyplexes could have beneficially affected
their internalization.
Figure 6
Flow cytometry measurements showing the uptake of polyplexes
made
of Alexa Fluor 488-labeled siRNA and linear bisspermine and linear
or dendritic tetraspermine compared to polyethylenimine (PEI). Mean
fluorescence intensities were quantified in H1299/LUC cells after
a 24 h incubation with polyplexes prepared at N/P ratios of 2 and
10. Trypan blue treatment was performed to quench the extracellular
binding of siRNA polyplexes to the cell. Cells treated with trypan
blue showed decreased mean fluorescence intensities.
Flow cytometry measurements showing the uptake of polyplexes
made
of Alexa Fluor 488-labeled siRNA and linear n>an class="Chemical">bisspermine and linear
or dendritic tetraspermine compared to polyethylenimine (PEI). Mean
fluorescence intensities were quantified in H1299/LUC cells after
a 24 h incubation with polyplexes prepared at N/P ratios of 2 and
10. Trypan blue treatment was performed to quench the extracellular
binding of siRNA polyplexes to the cell. Cells treated with trypan
blue showed decreased mean fluorescence intensities.
Real-time PCR
was performed to quantify
the knockdown of the mRNA level mediated by polypn>lexes made of GADPH
siRNA (200 pmol/well) and oligospermines at a N/P ratio of 2. All
oligospermines were used to form polyplexes with negative control
siRNA (siNC) as well. Linear bisspermine/siRNA polyplexes did not
show gene silencing. This can be attributed to the incomplete siRNA
release from the polyplex in the endolysosomal compartment, as shown
in Figure 4B. The most efficient oligospermine
candidate was the linear tetraspermine, which is in line with the
results of polyplexes size, zeta potentials, and flow cytometry. Linear
tetraspermine polyplexes were shown to downregulate the RNA expression
more effectively than dendritic tetraspermines (54.6 ± 17.3 vs
75.1 ± 1.5% residual GAPDH expression) (Figure 7). The dendritic structures showed less RNA knockdown compared
to the linear tetraspermine structure, which could be explained by
its less efficient uptake into the cells. Comparing the results of
the three oligospermine polyplex formulations, we conclude that the
difference in the architecture of the polymer strongly affected the
efficiency of siRNA delivery into H1299/LUC cells. The linear tetraspermine
structure is favored for successful siRNA delivery into lung cancer
cells.
Figure 7
Transfection efficiency in vitro (H1299/LUC cells) of oligospermines
polyplexes at a N/P ratio of 2 on the mRNA level measured by qRT-PCR
and compared to lipofectamine (LF). Hs_GAPDH primers were used to
quantify hGAPDH gene expression. Hs_β-actin primers were employed
as an internal standard to evaluate the relative gene expression of
the two genes and to normalize the changes in hGAPDH expression. Calibration
curves of hGAPDH and β-actin were plotted by serial dilution
of cDNA from untreated cells. Polyplexes made of GADPH siRNA and linear
tetraspermine showed the best knockdown compared to dendritic tetraspermine
(54.6 vs 75.1% residual GAPDH expression) and linear bisspermine polyplexes
(no knockdown).
Transfection efficiency in vitro (H1299/LUC cells) of n>an class="Chemical">oligospermines
polyplexes at a N/P ratio of 2 on the mRNA level measured by qRT-PCR
and compared to lipofectamine (LF). Hs_GAPDH primers were used to
quantify hGAPDH gene expression. Hs_β-actin primers were employed
as an internal standard to evaluate the relative gene expression of
the two genes and to normalize the changes in hGAPDH expression. Calibration
curves of hGAPDH and β-actin were plotted by serial dilution
of cDNA from untreated cells. Polyplexes made of GADPH siRNA and linear
tetraspermine showed the best knockdown compared to dendritic tetraspermine
(54.6 vs 75.1% residual GAPDH expression) and linear bisspermine polyplexes
(no knockdown).
Protein Knockdown Measured
in Reporter Gene Assays
At pH 4.5, the secondary amines are
protonated, leading to a strong
buffering capn>acity inside the endosomes and thus a further influx
of n>an class="Chemical">hydrochloric acid and water, leading eventually to endosomal rupture.
This event is believed to release endocytosed polyplexes and to support
their endosomal escape into the cytosol.[11] The silencing efficiency on luciferase protein expression in H1299/LUC
cells induced by oligospermines polyplexes at a N/P ratio of 2 was
evaluated after transfection with 40 pmol of anti-LUC siRNA after
48 h of incubation. The results were normalized to the relative expression
of untreated cells and compared to commercially available LF 2000.
LF has been used in many studies as a positive control for siRNA-mediated
knockdown efficiency.[60] As in the mRNA
knockdown experiments, negative control siRNA (siNC) was also used
with all oligospermines and LF. Linear tetraspermine/siRNA polyplexes
showed the best knockdown effect on luciferase expression compared
to the other two oligospermines (Figure 8),
which is in agreement with the qRT-PCR results. The dendritic tetraspermine
and LF showed higher nonspecific gene knockdown with the control siRNA
than the other polymers. This kind of off-target effect is normally
understood as a cytotoxic effect, which can be explained by the cytotoxicity
profiles shown in Figure 5. These results suggest
that the oligospermine architecture not only affected the interaction
of the protonated portions of the polymer with the phosphate groups
of siRNA but also these different siRNA complexation behaviors also
lead to different efficiencies of gene knockdown. Linear bisspermine
polyplexes were taken up by the cell but showed neither knockdown
at the mRNA nor the protein level. This is attributed to the lack
of amines in the short chain length and the low molecular weight of
the bisspermine structure, which does not condense siRNA as quantitatively
as the tetraspermines (Figure 3) and also does
not efficiently decomplex (Figure 4B). Our
results are in line with other reports in which Eliyahu et al. compared
two chemically modified spermine-based delivery systems for DNA delivery
in terms of the number of spermine moieties and the distribution of
charge density on the polymer backbone. In their study, a low- and
a high-sperminated polymer were examined. The low-sperminated polymer
showed 56% less spermine per weight and 28% less primary amines than
the high-sperminated polymer. The low-sperminated polymer was less
efficient in neutralizing the negative groups of the nucleic acids
and hence showed a lower transfection efficiency compared to the high-sperminated
polymer.[11] Another study of cationic spermine
conjugates with different polysaccharides showed efficient in vitro
transfection with high spermine content (2000 nmol/mg).[11] In vivo experiments showed that chemically modified
dextran–spermine polyplexes successfully transfected mice with
low toxicity and good tolerability when a combined intramuscular and
intranasal administration was performed.[42,61] However, for efficient transfection, a high positive zeta potential
of the polyplex and large DNA doses were necessary.[61] Dendritic structures have been described to be more accessible
for electrostatic interaction with RNA.[43] This is the case if the structurally inner amines are available
for protonation, which then also enhances the proton-sponge effect,[44] endosomal escape, and transfection efficiency.[43] However, our results showed that the amines
in the short dendritic structure are not all available for interaction
with siRNA. In comparison with short linear structures, short dendrimers
are more rigid. The protonated amines in the dendritic structure were
thus not neutralized, which increased the cytotoxicity of the polyplexes.
The polyplexes made with the dendritic structure did not show strong
uptake or gene knockdown efficiency, which may be due to the larger
sizes at a N/P ratio of 2 compared to the other two polymers or the
less spherical morphology. Therefore, the structural architecture
of dendritic tetraspermine was associated with increased cytotoxicity
and decreased transfection efficiency.
Figure 8
Silencing efficiency
of firefly luciferase expression in H1299/LUC
cells by oligospermine polyplexes with FLUC siRNA or nonspecific control
siRNA at a N/P ratio of 2 after 48 h of transfection compared to lipofectamine
(LF). The relative gene silencing was normalized to blank untreated
cells. Results are the mean value of triplicate measurements ±
SD.
Silencing efficiency
of firefly luciferase expression in H1299/LUC
cells by oligospermine polyplexes with FLUC siRNA or nonspecific control
siRNA at a N/P ratio of 2 after 48 h of transfection compared to lipofectamine
(LF). The relative gene silencing was normalized to blank untreated
cells. Results are the mean value of triplicate measurements ±
SD.
Conclusions
Here,
we have highlighted the importance of the structure–activity
relationship (SAR) of cationic oligospermines and its strong impact
on siRNA-delivery efficiency. The complexation and decomplexation
of siRNA and the carriers’ ability to escapn>e the degradation
in lysosomes are two main factors in determining the n>an class="Chemical">polymers’
transfection efficiency. The spatial availability of the positively
charged amines in the polymer plays an important role in its electrostatic
interaction with RNA and thus the shielding and protecting of siRNA.
Therefore, the oligospermine architecture was shown to affect the
transfection efficiency of polyplexes formed with siRNA. Consequently,
an optimization of the polymer used is necessary. This can be achieved
in many ways. Here, we investigated the effect of using different
numbers of spermine monomers. In addition, we examined the effect
of two different geometrical structures, namely, linear and dendritic
oligospermines. We found that tetramers of spermine are required to
provide the adequate positive charge for both uptake and the buffering
effect for endosomal escape. From the comparison of linear bisspermines
and linear tetraspermines, we found that increasing the number of
spermines and charge density within the polymer enhanced the transfection
efficiency with minimal toxicity. The linear structure is preferred
over the dendritic structure because the former seems to interact
more efficiently with siRNA, as not all amines of the latter are available
for siRNA condensation, leading to a more positive surface charge.
Showing more efficient charge neutralization, the linear tetraspermine
polyplexes are less cytotoxic and were shown to be more efficiently
transfected into lung carcinoma cells (H1299/LUC). Therefore, we conclude
that linear tetraspermines are very promising siRNA-delivery systems.
To enhance their intracellular uptake, coupling them with targeting
ligands is currently being investigated.
Authors: Tobias W M Keil; Daniel P Feldmann; Gabriella Costabile; Qian Zhong; Sandro da Rocha; Olivia M Merkel Journal: Eur J Pharm Biopharm Date: 2019-08-21 Impact factor: 5.571
Authors: Sara Movassaghian; Yuran Xie; Claudia Hildebrandt; Rayna Rosati; Ying Li; Na Hyung Kim; Denise S Conti; Sandro R P da Rocha; Zeng-Quan Yang; Olivia M Merkel Journal: Mol Pharm Date: 2016-06-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Daniel P Feldmann; Yuran Xie; Steven K Jones; Dongyue Yu; Anna Moszczynska; Olivia M Merkel Journal: Nanotechnology Date: 2017-05-10 Impact factor: 3.874
Authors: Daniel P Feldmann; Yilong Cheng; Rima Kandil; Yuran Xie; Mariam Mohammadi; Hartmann Harz; Akhil Sharma; David J Peeler; Anna Moszczynska; Heinrich Leonhardt; Suzie H Pun; Olivia M Merkel Journal: J Control Release Date: 2018-02-20 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: Yuran Xie; Na Hyung Kim; Venkatareddy Nadithe; Dana Schalk; Archana Thakur; Ayşe Kılıç; Lawrence G Lum; David J P Bassett; Olivia M Merkel Journal: J Control Release Date: 2016-03-19 Impact factor: 9.776