Literature DB >> 24550006

The TAF9 C-terminal conserved region domain is required for SAGA and TFIID promoter occupancy to promote transcriptional activation.

Malika Saint1, Sonal Sawhney, Ishani Sinha, Rana Pratap Singh, Rashmi Dahiya, Anushikha Thakur, Rahul Siddharthan, Krishnamurthy Natarajan.   

Abstract

A common function of the TFIID and SAGA complexes, which are recruited by transcriptional activators, is to deliver TBP to promoters to stimulate transcription. Neither the relative contributions of the five shared TBP-associated factor (TAF) subunits in TFIID and SAGA nor the requirement for different domains in shared TAFs for transcriptional activation is well understood. In this study, we uncovered the essential requirement for the highly conserved C-terminal region (CRD) of Taf9, a shared TAF, for transcriptional activation in yeast. Transcriptome profiling performed under Gcn4-activating conditions showed that the Taf9 CRD is required for induced expression of ∼9% of the yeast genome. The CRD was not essential for the Taf9-Taf6 interaction, TFIID or SAGA integrity, or Gcn4 interaction with SAGA in cell extracts. Microarray profiling of a SAGA mutant (spt20Δ) yielded a common set of genes induced by Spt20 and the Taf9 CRD. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays showed that, although the Taf9 CRD mutation did not impair Gcn4 occupancy, the occupancies of TFIID, SAGA, and the preinitiation complex were severely impaired at several promoters. These results suggest a crucial role for the Taf9 CRD in genome-wide transcription and highlight the importance of conserved domains, other than histone fold domains, as a common determinant for TFIID and SAGA functions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24550006      PMCID: PMC3993605          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01060-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  75 in total

1.  A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR.

Authors:  M W Pfaffl
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Transcriptional activation by Gcn4p involves independent interactions with the SWI/SNF complex and the SRB/mediator.

Authors:  K Natarajan; B M Jackson; H Zhou; F Winston; A G Hinnebusch
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 3.  Gcn4p, a master regulator of gene expression, is controlled at multiple levels by diverse signals of starvation and stress.

Authors:  Alan G Hinnebusch; Krishnamurthy Natarajan
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2002-02

4.  Use of a genetically introduced cross-linker to identify interaction sites of acidic activators within native transcription factor IID and SAGA.

Authors:  Joachim Klein; Mark Nolden; Steven L Sanders; Jay Kirchner; P Anthony Weil; Karsten Melcher
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-12-24       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Systematic analysis of essential yeast TAFs in genome-wide transcription and preinitiation complex assembly.

Authors:  Wu-Cheng Shen; Sukesh R Bhaumik; Helen C Causton; Itamar Simon; Xiaochun Zhu; Ezra G Jennings; Tseng-Hsing Wang; Richard A Young; Michael R Green
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  TFIID TAF6-TAF9 complex formation involves the HEAT repeat-containing C-terminal domain of TAF6 and is modulated by TAF5 protein.

Authors:  Elisabeth Scheer; Frédéric Delbac; Laszlo Tora; Dino Moras; Christophe Romier
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  A multiplicity of coactivators is required by Gcn4p at individual promoters in vivo.

Authors:  Mark J Swanson; Hongfang Qiu; Laarni Sumibcay; Anna Krueger; Soon-ja Kim; Krishnamurthy Natarajan; Sungpil Yoon; Alan G Hinnebusch
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  H3K4me3 interactions with TAF3 regulate preinitiation complex assembly and selective gene activation.

Authors:  Shannon M Lauberth; Takahiro Nakayama; Xiaolin Wu; Andrea L Ferris; Zhanyun Tang; Stephen H Hughes; Robert G Roeder
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Transcriptional regulatory networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Tong Ihn Lee; Nicola J Rinaldi; François Robert; Duncan T Odom; Ziv Bar-Joseph; Georg K Gerber; Nancy M Hannett; Christopher T Harbison; Craig M Thompson; Itamar Simon; Julia Zeitlinger; Ezra G Jennings; Heather L Murray; D Benjamin Gordon; Bing Ren; John J Wyrick; Jean-Bosco Tagne; Thomas L Volkert; Ernest Fraenkel; David K Gifford; Richard A Young
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-10-25       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Bayesian analysis of gene expression levels: statistical quantification of relative mRNA level across multiple strains or treatments.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Townsend; Daniel L Hartl
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2002-11-20       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  12 in total

1.  Chromatin remodeler Ino80C acts independently of H2A.Z to evict promoter nucleosomes and stimulate transcription of highly expressed genes in yeast.

Authors:  Hongfang Qiu; Emily Biernat; Chhabi K Govind; Yashpal Rawal; Răzvan V Chereji; David J Clark; Alan G Hinnebusch
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Reprogramming of translation in yeast cells impaired for ribosome recycling favors short, efficiently translated mRNAs.

Authors:  Swati Gaikwad; Fardin Ghobakhlou; David J Young; Jyothsna Visweswaraiah; Hongen Zhang; Alan G Hinnebusch
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Mediator binding to UASs is broadly uncoupled from transcription and cooperative with TFIID recruitment to promoters.

Authors:  Sebastian Grünberg; Steven Henikoff; Steven Hahn; Gabriel E Zentner
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Disome and Trisome Profiling Reveal Genome-wide Targets of Ribosome Quality Control.

Authors:  Sezen Meydan; Nicholas R Guydosh
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Distinct functions of three chromatin remodelers in activator binding and preinitiation complex assembly.

Authors:  Yashpal Rawal; Hongfang Qiu; Alan G Hinnebusch
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 6.020

6.  Reconfiguration of Transcriptional Control of Lysine Biosynthesis in Candida albicans Involves a Central Role for the Gcn4 Transcriptional Activator.

Authors:  Yumnam Priyadarshini; Krishnamurthy Natarajan
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 4.389

7.  Genome-wide cooperation by HAT Gcn5, remodeler SWI/SNF, and chaperone Ydj1 in promoter nucleosome eviction and transcriptional activation.

Authors:  Hongfang Qiu; Răzvan V Chereji; Cuihua Hu; Hope A Cole; Yashpal Rawal; David J Clark; Alan G Hinnebusch
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Relating protein functional diversity to cell type number identifies genes that determine dynamic aspects of chromatin organisation as potential contributors to organismal complexity.

Authors:  Daniela Lopes Cardoso; Colin Sharpe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Transcriptional changes in mesenteric and subcutaneous adipose tissue from Holstein cows in response to plane of dietary energy.

Authors:  S J Moisá; P Ji; J K Drackley; S L Rodriguez-Zas; J J Loor
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2017-12-04

10.  Identification of DNA-Repair-Related Five-Gene Signature to Predict Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Xueping Li; Lan Zhao; Longyang Jiang; Xinyue Song; Aoshuang Qi; Ting Chen; Mingyi Ju; Baohui Hu; Minjie Wei; Miao He; Lin Zhao
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.201

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.