Literature DB >> 24535759

Three-dimensional volumetric quantification of fat loss following cryolipolysis.

Lilit Garibyan1, William H Sipprell, H Ray Jalian, Fernanda H Sakamoto, Mathew Avram, R Rox Anderson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cryolipolysis is a noninvasive and well-tolerated treatment for reduction of localized subcutaneous fat. Although several studies demonstrate the safety and efficacy of this procedure, volumetric fat reduction from this treatment has not been quantified. This prospective study investigated the change in volume of fat after cryolipolysis treatment using three-dimensional (3D) photography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study of subjects treated with cryolipolysis on the flank (love handle) was performed at Massachusetts General Hospital. Volume measurements were performed with a Canfield Scientific Vectra three-dimensional camera and software to evaluate the amount of post procedure volume change. Clinical outcomes were assessed with caliper measurements, subject surveys, and blinded physician assessment of photographs.
RESULTS: Eleven subjects were enrolled in this study. Each subject underwent a single cycle of cryolipolysis to one flank. The untreated flank served as an internal control. The follow-up time after treatment was 2 months. The mean amount of calculated absolute fat volume loss using 3D photography from baseline to 2 months follow-up visit was 56.2 ± 25.6 from the treatment site and 16.6 ± 17.6 cc from the control (P < 0.0001). A mean absolute difference of 39.6 cc between the treated and untreated sides was calculated at 2 months post-treatment. Comparison of caliper measurements from baseline to 2 months post-treatment demonstrated significant reduction of the treated flank from 45.6 ± 5.8 mm at baseline to 38.6 ± 4.6 mm at 2 months post-treatment (P < 0.001). The untreated flank did not show significant reduction with caliper measurements demonstrating 45.3 ± 5.0 mm at baseline and 44.6 ± 5.1 mm at 2 months post-treatment (P = 0.360). No unexpected side effects or adverse events were reported. Post-treatment satisfaction surveys demonstrated 82% of subjects were satisfied with the results.
CONCLUSIONS: Cryolipolysis is a safe, well-tolerated, and effective noninvasive fat removal methodology that on average leads to 39.6 cc of fat loss of the treated flank at 2 months after a single treatment cycle.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cold induced fat loss; fat removal; imaging; noninvasive; volume of fat

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24535759      PMCID: PMC4123113          DOI: 10.1002/lsm.22207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Surg Med        ISSN: 0196-8092            Impact factor:   4.025


  12 in total

1.  Don't try this at home: liposuction in the kitchen by an unqualified practitioner leads to disastrous complications.

Authors:  Arthur E Desrosiers; Robert T Grant; Arnold S Breitbart
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Body contouring: the skinny on noninvasive fat removal.

Authors:  H Ray Jalian; Mathew M Avram
Journal:  Semin Cutan Med Surg       Date:  2012-06

3.  Clinical efficacy of noninvasive cryolipolysis and its effects on peripheral nerves.

Authors:  Sydney R Coleman; Kulveen Sachdeva; Barbara M Egbert; Jessica Preciado; John Allison
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 2.326

4.  Autologous fat grafting: long-term evidence of its efficacy in midfacial rejuvenation.

Authors:  Jason D Meier; Robert A Glasgold; Mark J Glasgold
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb

5.  The geometric model and fat reduction.

Authors:  Christopher B Zachary; Nazanin Saedi; John Allison
Journal:  J Drugs Dermatol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.114

6.  Popsicle panniculitis.

Authors:  E H Epstein; M E Oren
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1970-04-23       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Non-invasive cryolipolysis for body contouring in Chinese--a first commercial experience.

Authors:  Samantha Y Shek; Nicola P Y Chan; Henry H Chan
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 8.  Cryolipolysis for subcutaneous fat layer reduction.

Authors:  Mathew M Avram; Rosemary S Harry
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.025

9.  Benchmarking outcomes in plastic surgery: national complication rates for abdominoplasty and breast augmentation.

Authors:  Amy K Alderman; E Dale Collins; Rachel Streu; James C Grotting; Amy L Sulkin; Peter Neligan; Phillip C Haeck; Karol A Gutowski
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Safety, tolerance, and patient satisfaction with noninvasive cryolipolysis.

Authors:  Christine C Dierickx; Jean-Michel Mazer; Mila Sand; Sylvie Koenig; Valerie Arigon
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.398

View more
  14 in total

1.  Evaluation of safety and efficacy of noninvasive radiofrequency technology for submental rejuvenation.

Authors:  Ji-Hye Park; Jung-In Kim; Hee Jin Park; Won-Serk Kim
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  A German Prospective Study of the Safety and Efficacy of a Non-Invasive, High-intensity, Electromagnetic Abdomen and Buttock Contouring Device.

Authors:  Steffen Giesse
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2021-01-01

3.  Effects of cryolipolysis on lower abdomen fat thickness of healthy women and patient satisfaction: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mariana Falster; Jociane Schardong; Débora Piassarollo Dos Santos; Bruna Coimbra Machado; Alessandra Peres; Patrícia Viana da Rosa; Rodrigo Della Méa Plentz
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Cryolipolysis conformable-surface applicator for nonsurgical fat reduction in lateral thighs.

Authors:  W Grant Stevens; Eric P Bachelor
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.283

Review 5.  Cryolipolysis for noninvasive body contouring: clinical efficacy and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Nils Krueger; Sophia V Mai; Stefanie Luebberding; Neil S Sadick
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2014-06-26

6.  Cryolipolysis in aesthetic plastic surgery.

Authors:  Karan Chopra; Kashyap K Tadisina; W Grant Stevens
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2014-08-22

7.  Health technology assessment of non-invasive interventions for weight loss and body shape in Iran.

Authors:  Marzieh Nojomi; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Ashraf Velayati; Ahmad Naghibzadeh-Tahami; Haleh Dadgostar; Gholamhossein Ghorabi; Mohammad Moradi-Joo; Mohsen Yaghoubi
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2016-04-03

8.  Non-invasive fat reduction of the flanks using a new cryolipolysis applicator and overlapping, two-cycle treatments.

Authors:  Eric F Bernstein; Jason D Bloom; Lisa D Basilavecchio; Jessica M Plugis
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 4.025

9.  Multiple same day cryolipolysis treatments for the reduction of subcutaneous fat are safe and do not affect serum lipid levels or liver function tests.

Authors:  Kenneth B Klein; Eric P Bachelor; Edward V Becker; Leyda E Bowes
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 4.025

10.  Prospective Controlled Study of Buttock Fat Transfer Using Ultrasound and Photographic Measurements.

Authors:  Eric Swanson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-05-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.